World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
72
Citations
20562
World Ranking
244
National Ranking
137

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
72
Citations
19369
World Ranking
912
National Ranking
318

John Lowengrub publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Lowengrub sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 238 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

John Lowengrub D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Lowengrub sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1995 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

John Lowengrub is affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine, with a significant focus on modeling and simulation as well as cellular biology.

Their work is published extensively in well-known scientific venues, including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • PLoS Computational Biology
  • Journal of Computational Physics
  • Journal of Mathematical Biology

Lowengrub's main fields of study encompass biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach. They have contributed notably to various subfields, such as:

  • Modeling and Simulation
  • Cell Biology
  • Computational Mechanics
  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Molecular Biology

The scientist's research research topics cover a diverse range of subjects including:

  • Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
  • Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Theoretical and Computational Physics
  • Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
  • Fluid Dynamics and Thin Films
  • Solidification and crystal growth phenomena

Some of their recent published papers are:

  • The Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS), 2022, Medical Image Analysis
  • A multiscale model of virus pandemic: Heterogeneous interactive entities in a globally connected world, 2020, CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies)
  • An in vitro vascularized micro-tumor model of human colorectal cancer recapitulates in vivo responses to standard-of-care therapy, 2021, Lab on a Chip
  • Mathematical modeling of cancer immunotherapy for personalized clinical translation, 2022, Nature Computational Science
  • A diffuse domain method for two-phase flows with large density ratio in complex geometries, 2020, Journal of Fluid Mechanics

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Shuwang Li
  • Meng Zhao
  • Pedro H. A. Anjos
  • Zirui Zhang
  • Ivan Ezhov

John Lowengrub has been recognized as a Fellow by the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2019 and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation in 1995.

Best Publications

  • Quasi–incompressible Cahn–Hilliard fluids and topological transitions

    J. Lowengrub;L. Truskinovsky

  • The Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS)

    Patrick Bilic;Patrick Ferdinand Christ;Eugene Vorontsov;Grzegorz Chlebus

  • Removing the stiffness from interfacial flows with surface tension

    Thomas Y. Hou;John S. Lowengrub;Michael J. Shelley

  • Nonlinear modelling of cancer: Bridging the gap between cells and tumours

    J. S. Lowengrub;H. B. Frieboes;H. B. Frieboes;F. Jin;F. Jin;Y. L. Chuang

  • Three-dimensional multispecies nonlinear tumor growth--I Model and numerical method.

    S. M. Wise;J. S. Lowengrub;H. B. Frieboes;H. B. Frieboes;Vittorio Cristini

  • An Energy-Stable and Convergent Finite-Difference Scheme for the Phase Field Crystal Equation

    S. M. Wise;C. Wang;J. S. Lowengrub

  • Multiscale modelling and nonlinear simulation of vascular tumour growth.

    Paul Macklin;Steven McDougall;Alexander R. A. Anderson;Mark A. J. Chaplain

  • Nonlinear simulation of tumor growth.

    Vittorio Cristini;John Lowengrub;Qing Nie

  • Conservative multigrid methods for Cahn-Hilliard fluids

    Junseok Kim;Kyungkeun Kang;John Lowengrub

  • Stable and efficient finite-difference nonlinear-multigrid schemes for the phase field crystal equation

    Z. Hu;S. M. Wise;C. Wang;J. S. Lowengrub

  • Nonlinear simulations of solid tumor growth using a mixture model: invasion and branching

    Vittorio Cristini;Xiangrong Li;John S. Lowengrub;Steven M. Wise

  • Multiscale Modeling of Cancer: An Integrated Experimental and Mathematical Modeling Approach

    Vittorio Cristini;John S. Lowengrub

  • A surfactant-conserving volume-of-fluid method for interfacial flows with insoluble surfactant

    Ashley J. James;John Lowengrub

  • Boundary integral methods for multicomponent fluids and multiphase materials

    T. Y. Hou;J. S. Lowengrub;M. J. Shelley

  • Computer simulation of glioma growth and morphology.

    Hermann B. Frieboes;Hermann B. Frieboes;John S. Lowengrub;S. Wise;X. Zheng

  • Three-Dimensional Multispecies Nonlinear Tumor Growth–II: Tumor Invasion and Angiogenesis

    Hermann B. Frieboes;Fang Jin;Fang Jin;Yao-Li Chuang;Steven M. Wise

  • SOLVING PDES IN COMPLEX GEOMETRIES: A DIFFUSE DOMAIN APPROACH.

    X. Li;J. Lowengrub;A. Ratz;A. Voigt

  • A diffuse-interface method for two-phase flows with soluble surfactants

    Knut Erik Teigen;Peng Song;John Lowengrub;Axel Voigt

  • A level-set method for interfacial flows with surfactant

    Jian-Jun Xu;Zhilin Li;John Lowengrub;Hongkai Zhao

  • The effect of interstitial pressure on tumor growth: coupling with the blood and lymphatic vascular systems

    Min Wu;Hermann B. Frieboes;Steven Robert McDougall;Mark A. J. Chaplain

  • INVITED ARTICLE: Nonlinear modelling of cancer: bridging the gap between cells and tumours

    John S. Lowengrub;H. B. Frieboes;Fengfei Jin;Y.-L. Chuang

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven M. Wise
Steven M. Wise University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Junseok Kim
Junseok Kim Korea University
Axel Voigt
Axel Voigt TU Dresden
Thomas Y. Hou
Thomas Y. Hou California Institute of Technology
Mark A. J. Chaplain
Mark A. J. Chaplain University of St Andrews
Cheng Wang
Cheng Wang University of Massachusetts Dartmouth
Michael Shelley
Michael Shelley Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
Vivek B. Shenoy
Vivek B. Shenoy University of Pennsylvania
Nicola Bellomo
Nicola Bellomo University of Granada
Christopher W. Macosko
Christopher W. Macosko University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For mathematics graduates looking to expand their skill set, pursuing related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Many professionals consider affordable options such as the cheapest online masters in finance to gain expertise in financial modeling and quantitative analysis.

If you're aiming to boost leadership skills alongside mathematical knowledge, exploring the shortest online mba programs can offer a streamlined path to management roles without lengthy time commitments.

Marketing also presents an exciting avenue where mathematical and analytical skills are valuable. Consider programs like a masters in marketing to specialize in data-driven market strategies and consumer insights.

For those wanting to accelerate their career progression, the one year mba is an excellent option that balances depth and speed, helping students quickly transition to leadership roles in analytics, finance, or consulting.

Best Scientists Citing John Lowengrub

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles