World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
51
Citations
10025
World Ranking
1029
National Ranking
479

Steven M. Wise publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven M. Wise sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 102 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Steven M. Wise D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven M. Wise sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Steven M. Wise is affiliated with the University of Tennessee at Knoxville in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields including Engineering, Materials Science, and Mathematics. Within these broader areas, their work focuses on subfields such as Materials Chemistry, Computational Mechanics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Numerical Analysis, and Applied Mathematics.

The scientist's research topics cover a wide range of subjects, including:

  • Solidification and crystal growth phenomena
  • Fluid Dynamics and Thin Films
  • Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
  • Differential Equations and Numerical Methods
  • Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
  • Block Copolymer Self-Assembly
  • Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory

Steven M. Wise has contributed to journal articles in several publication venues. The most frequent venues they have published in include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics
  • Journal of Scientific Computing
  • Mathematics of Computation
  • Communications in Computational Physics

Some notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Steven M. Wise include:

  • A positivity-preserving, energy stable and convergent numerical scheme for the Poisson-Nernst-Planck system (2021), Mathematics of Computation
  • A positivity-preserving, energy stable scheme for a ternary Cahn-Hilliard system with the singular interfacial parameters (2021), Journal of Computational Physics
  • Energy Stable Numerical Schemes for Ternary Cahn-Hilliard System (2020), Journal of Scientific Computing
  • An Energy Stable Finite Element Scheme for the Three-Component Cahn-Hilliard-Type Model for Macromolecular Microsphere Composite Hydrogels (2021), Journal of Scientific Computing
  • Numerical comparison of modified-energy stable SAV-type schemes and classical BDF methods on benchmark problems for the functionalized Cahn-Hilliard equation (2020), Journal of Computational Physics

The scientist has collaborated frequently with a number of co-authors, including:

  • Cheng Wang
  • Abner J. Salgado
  • Zhengru Zhang
  • Axel Voigt
  • Marco Salvalaglio

Steven M. Wise has also contributed to the publication of a book titled Classical Numerical Analysis, published by Cambridge University Press in 2022.

Best Publications

  • Nonlinear modelling of cancer: Bridging the gap between cells and tumours

    J. S. Lowengrub;H. B. Frieboes;H. B. Frieboes;F. Jin;F. Jin;Y. L. Chuang

  • Three-dimensional multispecies nonlinear tumor growth--I Model and numerical method.

    S. M. Wise;J. S. Lowengrub;H. B. Frieboes;H. B. Frieboes;Vittorio Cristini

  • An Energy-Stable and Convergent Finite-Difference Scheme for the Phase Field Crystal Equation

    S. M. Wise;C. Wang;J. S. Lowengrub

  • Second-order Convex Splitting Schemes for Gradient Flows with Ehrlich-Schwoebel Type Energy: Application to Thin Film Epitaxy

    Jie Shen;Cheng Wang;Xiaoming Wang;Steven M. Wise

  • Stable and efficient finite-difference nonlinear-multigrid schemes for the phase field crystal equation

    Z. Hu;S. M. Wise;C. Wang;J. S. Lowengrub

  • Nonlinear simulations of solid tumor growth using a mixture model: invasion and branching

    Vittorio Cristini;Xiangrong Li;John S. Lowengrub;Steven M. Wise

  • An Energy Stable and Convergent Finite-Difference Scheme for the Modified Phase Field Crystal Equation

    C. Wang;S. M. Wise

  • Nonlinear simulation of tumor necrosis, neo-vascularization and tissue invasion via an adaptive finite-element/level-set method.

    X. Zheng;S. M. Wise;Vittorio Cristini

  • Computer simulation of glioma growth and morphology.

    Hermann B. Frieboes;Hermann B. Frieboes;John S. Lowengrub;S. Wise;X. Zheng

  • Three-Dimensional Multispecies Nonlinear Tumor Growth–II: Tumor Invasion and Angiogenesis

    Hermann B. Frieboes;Fang Jin;Fang Jin;Yao-Li Chuang;Steven M. Wise

  • Solving the regularized, strongly anisotropic Cahn-Hilliard equation by an adaptive nonlinear multigrid method

    Steven M. Wise;Junseok Kim;John S. Lowengrub

  • A new phase-field model for strongly anisotropic systems

    Solmaz Torabi;John Lowengrub;Axel Voigt;Steven Wise

  • Unconditionally Stable Finite Difference, Nonlinear Multigrid Simulation of the Cahn-Hilliard-Hele-Shaw System of Equations

    S. M. Wise

  • Convergence Analysis of a Second Order Convex Splitting Scheme for the Modified Phase Field Crystal Equation

    Arvind Baskaran;John S. Lowengrub;C. Wang;Steven M. Wise

  • Unconditionally stable schemes for equations of thin film epitaxy

    Cheng Wang;Xiaoming Wang;Steven M. Wise

  • A Second-Order Energy Stable BDF Numerical Scheme for the Cahn-Hilliard Equation

    Yue Yan;Wenbin Chen;Cheng Wang;Steven M. Wise

  • Convergence analysis and error estimates for a second order accurate finite element method for the Cahn–Hilliard–Navier–Stokes system

    Amanda E. Diegel;Cheng Wang;Xiaoming Wang;Steven M. Wise

  • An $H^2$ convergence of a second-order convex-splitting, finite difference scheme for the three-dimensional Cahn–Hilliard equation

    Jing Guo;Cheng Wang;Steven M. Wise;Xingye Yue

  • Second order convex splitting schemes for periodic nonlocal Cahn-Hilliard and Allen-Cahn equations

    Zhen Guan;John S. Lowengrub;Cheng Wang;Steven M. Wise

  • Multiparameter Computational Modeling of Tumor Invasion

    Elaine L. Bearer;John S. Lowengrub;Hermann B. Frieboes;Yao Li Chuang

  • Positivity-preserving, energy stable numerical schemes for the Cahn-Hilliard equation with logarithmic potential

    Wenbin Chen;Cheng Wang;Xiaoming Wang;Xiaoming Wang;Xiaoming Wang;Steven M. Wise

  • INVITED ARTICLE: Nonlinear modelling of cancer: bridging the gap between cells and tumours

    John S. Lowengrub;H. B. Frieboes;Fengfei Jin;Y.-L. Chuang

Frequent Co-Authors

Cheng Wang
Cheng Wang University of Massachusetts Dartmouth
John Lowengrub
John Lowengrub University of California, Irvine
Xiaoming Wang
Xiaoming Wang Florida State University
Axel Voigt
Axel Voigt TU Dresden
Junseok Kim
Junseok Kim Korea University
Jie Shen
Jie Shen Eastern Institute of Technology, Ningbo
Katsuyo Thornton
Katsuyo Thornton University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Peter W. Voorhees
Peter W. Voorhees Northwestern University
Mauro Ferrari
Mauro Ferrari Houston Methodist
Bobby G. Sumpter
Bobby G. Sumpter Oak Ridge National Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Mathematics in the USA opens doors to a variety of interdisciplinary career paths. Many students combine their math foundation with fields like business, marketing, or data science to enhance their job prospects. For those interested in advancing their credentials, exploring the marketing masters can provide valuable skills in market analysis and strategic decision-making.

Business professionals often seek accelerated programs such as the best 1 year mba programs to quickly elevate their leadership abilities while leveraging analytical strengths gained from math studies. Many online options are flexible, with some allowing credits transfer to fast-track degree completion—making the online mba accepting transfer credits a popular choice for busy professionals.

For math graduates focused on technology and insights, pursuing a data analytics master's degree aligns well with market demands. This degree harnesses mathematical modeling and statistical techniques to solve complex problems in various industries, ensuring strong career growth in a data-driven economy.

Best Scientists Citing Steven M. Wise

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles