World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
67
Citations
16798
World Ranking
338
National Ranking
18

Mark A. J. Chaplain publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. J. Chaplain sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 287 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Mark A. J. Chaplain D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. J. Chaplain sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2003 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh

Best Publications

  • Growth of necrotic tumors in the presence and absence of inhibitors.

    H.M. Byrne;M.A.J. Chaplain

  • Mathematical modelling of dynamic adaptive tumour-induced angiogenesis: clinical implications and therapeutic targeting strategies.

    Steven R. McDougall;Alexander R.A. Anderson;Mark A.J. Chaplain

  • Mathematical modelling of tumour invasion and metastasis

    A. R. A. Anderson;M. A. J. Chaplain;E. L. Newman;R. J. C. Steele

  • Multiscale modelling and nonlinear simulation of vascular tumour growth.

    Paul Macklin;Steven McDougall;Alexander R. A. Anderson;Mark A. J. Chaplain

  • Mathematical modelling of cancer cell invasion of tissue: local and non-local models and the effect of adhesion.

    A. Gerisch;M.A.J. Chaplain

  • Mathematical Modeling of Tumor-Induced Angiogenesis

    M. A. J. Chaplain;S. R. McDougall;A. R. A. Anderson

  • MATHEMATICAL MODELLING OF CANCER CELL INVASION OF TISSUE: THE ROLE OF THE UROKINASE PLASMINOGEN ACTIVATION SYSTEM

    M. A. J. Chaplain;G. Lolas

  • Single-Cell-Based Models in Biology and Medicine

    Alexander R. A. Anderson;Mark A. J. Chaplain;Katarzyna A. Rejniak

  • Avascular growth, angiogenesis and vascular growth in solid tumours: The mathematical modelling of the stages of tumour development

    M. A. J. Chaplain

  • A new mathematical model for avascular tumour growth

    Jonathan A. Sherratt;Mark A.J. Chaplain

  • Mathematical modelling of cancer invasion of tissue: dynamic heterogeneity

    Mark A. J. Chaplain;G. Lolas

  • Spatio-temporal pattern formation on spherical surfaces: numerical simulation and application to solid tumour growth

    M.A.J. Chaplain;M. Ganesh;I.G. Graham

  • Modeling the Influence of the E-Cadherin-β-Catenin Pathway in Cancer Cell Invasion : A Multiscale Approach

    Ignacio Ramis-Conde;Ignacio Ramis-Conde;Dirk Drasdo;Dirk Drasdo;Alexander R. A. Anderson;Mark A. J. Chaplain

  • Quantifying the role of angiogenesis in malignant progression of gliomas: in silico modeling integrates imaging and histology

    Kristin R. Swanson;Russell C. Rockne;Jonathan Claridge;Mark A. Chaplain

  • A model mechanism for the chemotactic response of endothelial cells to tumour angiogenesis factor

    M. A. J. Chaplain;A. M. Stuart

  • Modelling the role of cell-cell adhesion in the growth and development of carcinomas

    H. M. Byrne;M. A. J. Chaplain

  • A mathematical model of breast cancer development, local treatment and recurrence

    Heiko Enderling;Mark A.J. Chaplain;Alexander R.A. Anderson;Jayant S. Vaidya

  • The effect of interstitial pressure on tumor growth: coupling with the blood and lymphatic vascular systems

    Min Wu;Hermann B. Frieboes;Steven Robert McDougall;Mark A. J. Chaplain

  • Free boundary value problems associated with the growth and development of multicellular spheroids

    H. M. Byrne;M. A. J. Chaplain

  • Growth of necrotic tumors in the presence and absence of inhibitors

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexander R. A. Anderson
Alexander R. A. Anderson Moffitt Cancer Center
Helen M. Byrne
Helen M. Byrne University of Oxford
John Lowengrub
John Lowengrub University of California, Irvine
Nicola Bellomo
Nicola Bellomo University of Granada
Giovanni Dosi
Giovanni Dosi Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies
Luigi Preziosi
Luigi Preziosi Polytechnic University of Turin
Guido Forni
Guido Forni University of Turin
Philip K. Maini
Philip K. Maini University of Oxford
Daniel L. Feltham
Daniel L. Feltham University of Reading
Suzanne M. Skevington
Suzanne M. Skevington University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Mathematics in the USA, expanding into related fields through online degrees can provide versatile career opportunities. Many choose to complement their math skills with business qualifications, such as an easiest mba program to get into, which can open doors to management and leadership roles with minimal entry barriers.

Similarly, those interested in flexible learning options might explore the easiest online mba programs to get into. These programs offer convenience without sacrificing quality, enabling students to balance studies with other commitments.

For advanced professionals aiming to deepen their expertise, pursuing a doctoral degree through the most affordable online dba programs combines rigorous research with practical insights, ideal for careers in academia or executive positions.

Additionally, those keen on finance can build upon their analytical background by enrolling in a cheap masters in finance. This degree is a strategic choice for entering high-demand sectors such as investment, banking, or financial analytics.

Best Scientists Citing Mark A. J. Chaplain

Recently Published Articles