World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
57
Citations
15278
World Ranking
3987
National Ranking
426

Suzanne M. Skevington publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Suzanne M. Skevington sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 130 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Suzanne M. Skevington D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Suzanne M. Skevington sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Suzanne M. Skevington is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with significant contributions to the subfields of General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Oncology, and Nephrology.

The topics central to Skevington's work include Health, psychology, and well-being; Cancer survivorship and care; Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life; Dialysis and Renal Disease Management; Health disparities and outcomes; Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues; and Art Therapy and Mental Health.

Frequent coauthors in their research collaborations include Currie Moore, Lesley-Anne Carter, Sandip Mitra, Alison Wearden, and Maria Panagioti.

Skevington has published multiple papers in several scientific journals. The most recent notable publications are:

  • Enhancing the multi-dimensional assessment of quality of life: introducing the WHOQOL-Combi, 2020, Quality of Life Research
  • Is Culture Important to the Relationship Between Quality of Life and Resilience? Global Implications for Preparing Communities for Environmental and Health Disasters, 2020, Frontiers in Psychology
  • Community asset participation and social medicine increases qualities of life, 2020, Social Science & Medicine
  • Peer support to maintain psychological wellbeing in people with advanced cancer: findings from a feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial, 2020, BMC Palliative Care
  • Quality of life improved for patients after starting dialysis but is impaired, initially, for their partners: a multi-centre, longitudinal study, 2020, BMC Nephrology

The publishing venues where Skevington frequently contributes include:

  • Quality of Life Research
  • BMC Nephrology
  • Social Science & Medicine
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • BMC Palliative Care

Best Publications

  • The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group.

    Suzanne M. Skevington;M. Lotfy;K. A. O'Connell

  • A cross-cultural study of spirituality, religion and personal beliefs as components of quality of life.

    Suzanne Skevington

  • On subjective well-being and quality of life

    Laura Camfield;Suzanne M. Skevington

  • Investigating the relationship between pain and discomfort and quality of life, using the WHOQOL.

    Suzanne M Skevington

  • The effects of exercise interventions on quality of life in clinical and healthy populations; a meta-analysis.

    Fiona Bridget Gillison;Suzanne M. Skevington;Ayana Sato;Martyn Standage

  • Advancing cross-cultural research on quality of life: Observations drawn from the WHOQOL development

    Suzanne M. Skevington

  • Developing methods for assessing quality of life in different cultural settings. The history of the WHOQOL instruments.

    Suzanne M. Skevington;Norman Sartorius;Marianne Amir

  • Expecting a good quality of life in health: assessing people with diverse diseases and conditions using the WHOQOL-BREF.

    Suzanne M. Skevington;Farah M. McCrate

  • WHOQOL-HIV for quality of life assessment among people living with HIV and AIDS: results from the field test

    K. A. O'Connell;Shekhar Saxena;S. M. Skevington

  • Putting the Q into quality of life; the identification of subjective constructions of health-related quality of life using Q methodology.

    Paul H.D Stenner;Deborah Cooper;Suzanne M Skevington

  • Preliminary development of the World Health Organsiation's Quality of Life HIV instrument (WHOQOL-HIV): analysis of the pilot version.

    K O'Connell;S Skevington;S Saxena

  • Exploring the experience of introjected regulation for exercise across gender in adolescence

    Fiona Gillison;Mike Osborn;Martyn Standage;Suzanne Skevington

  • An international quality of life instrument to assess wellbeing in adults who are HIV-positive: a short form of the WHOQOL-HIV (31 items).

    Kathryn Ann O’Connell;Suzanne M. Skevington

  • How is subjective well-being related to quality of life? Do we need two concepts and both measures?

    S.M. Skevington;J.R. Böhnke

  • Measuring quality of life in britain: Introducing the WHOQOL-100

    Suzanne M Skevington

  • Changes in quality of life and psychological need satisfaction following the transition to secondary school

    Fiona Gillison;Martyn Standage;Suzanne Skevington

  • Can people with mild to moderate dementia provide reliable answers about their quality of life

    Richard Trigg;Roy W. Jones;Suzanne M. Skevington

  • Changes in the quality of life of patients receiving antidepressant medication in primary care: Validation of the WHOQOL–100

    Unknown

  • Validation of the WHOQOL-100: pain management improves quality of life for chronic pain patients.

    Suzanne M. Skevington;Marlene S. Carse;Amanda C. De C. Williams

  • The relevance of spirituality, religion and personal beliefs to health-related quality of life: Themes from focus groups in Britain

    Kathryn A. O'Connell;Suzanne M. Skevington

  • Initial steps to developing the World Health Organisation’s Quality of Life Instrument (WHOQOL) module for international assessment of HIV/AIDS

    Suzanne M Skevington

Frequent Co-Authors

Fiona Gillison
Fiona Gillison University of Bath
Martyn Standage
Martyn Standage University of Bath
Peter Bower
Peter Bower University of Manchester
Maria Panagioti
Maria Panagioti University of Manchester
Mirko Uljarević
Mirko Uljarević University of Melbourne
Alison Wearden
Alison Wearden University of Manchester
Anna Kokkevi
Anna Kokkevi National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Peter A. Coventry
Peter A. Coventry University of York
Richard Emsley
Richard Emsley King's College London
Jeremy R. Parr
Jeremy R. Parr Newcastle University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology or therapy opens up several online degree options and diverse professional pathways. Many students pursue online programs for added flexibility while preparing for important licensure requirements and regional regulations.

For example, becoming a licensed therapist in Corpus Christi requires a graduate degree, supervised clinical experience, and passing a national exam. Similarly, Dallas licensed therapist requirements include specialized coursework and practical training to ensure professionals meet state standards.

Requirements can vary in other regions. For instance, Denver licensed therapist requirements specify unique steps and documentation, while Detroit licensed therapist education requirements focus heavily on accredited education pathways and background checks.

If you’re interested in counseling, clinical psychology, or therapy, reviewing the specific requirements by location—and considering online degree options aligned with those criteria—can help you chart a direct, efficient path toward your chosen career.

Best Scientists Citing Suzanne M. Skevington

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles