World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 65 2753 5 215 39908

Mick Power publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mick Power between 1984 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mick Power published across 42 years, from 1984 to 2025, averaging 5.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2012. 6 of the 243 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2012. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 2 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 2 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 0 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 6 publications
1984 2025

243 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mick Power: publications per year, 1984 to 2025
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 2
1986 3
1987 2
1988 5
1989 2
1990 4
1991 4
1992 6
1993 0
1994 4
1995 6
1996 5
1997 5
1998 7
1999 5
2000 5
2001 3
2002 5
2003 2
2004 5
2005 12
2006 6
2007 11
2008 11
2009 6
2010 18
2011 3
2012 20
2013 11
2014 16
2015 14
2016 4
2017 7
2018 8
2019 1
2020 2
2021 1
2022 0
2023 5
2024 0
2025 6
Total 243
Download as CSV

Mick Power publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mick Power sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 211–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 215 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313 215
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Mick Power D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mick Power sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290 65
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Cognition
  • Social psychology
  • Psychiatry

His primary areas of study are Clinical psychology, Psychometrics, Quality of life, Test validity and Psychiatry. His Clinical psychology study incorporates themes from Differential item functioning, Cronbach's alpha and Well-being. As a part of the same scientific study, he usually deals with the Psychometrics, concentrating on Psychological testing and frequently concerns with Explained variation, Intraclass correlation, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and Classical test theory.

Mick Power has researched Quality of life in several fields, including Gerontology and Medical education. His study looks at the relationship between Gerontology and topics such as Whoqol bref, which overlap with Position paper, Context and Applied psychology. His Test validity study combines topics in areas such as Construct validity, Criterion validity and Social psychology.

His most cited work include:

  • Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life Assessment (3772 citations)
  • The world health organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL) - position paper from the world health organization (3641 citations)
  • The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. (2179 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Mick Power mostly deals with Clinical psychology, Cognition, Developmental psychology, Psychometrics and Psychiatry. His research in Clinical psychology intersects with topics in Psychotherapist, Cronbach's alpha, Depression and Anxiety. His Self-concept study in the realm of Developmental psychology connects with subjects such as Trait.

His studies in Psychometrics integrate themes in fields like Mental health, Test validity, Rasch model and Scale. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Social support and Quality of life. His studies in Quality of life integrate themes in fields like Test, Public health and Medical education.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Clinical psychology (32.62%)
  • Cognition (21.99%)
  • Developmental psychology (19.15%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2020)?

  • Gerontology (12.77%)
  • Social psychology (11.35%)
  • Clinical psychology (32.62%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Mick Power mainly investigates Gerontology, Social psychology, Clinical psychology, Cognition and Quality of life. The concepts of his Gerontology study are interwoven with issues in Test, Health related quality of life and Clinical research. His Social psychology research integrates issues from Item response theory and Exploratory factor analysis.

His work deals with themes such as Psychotherapist, Happiness and Emotion classification, which intersect with Clinical psychology. His Cognition research includes elements of Emotional disorder, Cognitive psychology and Developmental psychology. His study deals with a combination of Quality of life and Business.

Between 2012 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • Assessing the quality of life of health-referred children and adolescents with short stature: development and psychometric testing of the QoLISSY instrument. (35 citations)
  • The role of emotion in PTSD: two preliminary studies. (32 citations)
  • The assessment of the readiness of five countries to implement child maltreatment prevention programs on a large scale (30 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Cognition
  • Psychotherapist
  • Major depressive disorder

His primary scientific interests are in Clinical psychology, Scale, Sadness, Emotion classification and Happiness. His research integrates issues of Psychological resilience, Moderation, Health psychology, Chronic pain and Empirical research in his study of Clinical psychology. His Scale study typically links adjacent topics like Medical education.

His Sadness study incorporates themes from Psychological trauma, Psychometrics, Dysfunctional family and Disgust. The study incorporates disciplines such as Psychiatry, Anger and Anxiety in addition to Emotion classification.

Best Publications

  • Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life Assessment

    A. Harper;M. Power

  • The world health organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL) - position paper from the world health organization

    W. Kuyken;J. Orley;M. Power;H. Herrman

  • The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties.

    M.J. Power;W. Kuyken;J. Orley;H. Herman

  • Cognition and Emotion : From Order to Disorder

    Michael J. Power;Tim Dalgleish

  • KIDSCREEN-52 quality-of-life measure for children and adolescents.

    Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer;Angela Gosch;Luis Rajmil;Michael Erhart

  • The KIDSCREEN-27 quality of life measure for children and adolescents: psychometric results from a cross-cultural survey in 13 European countries.

    Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer;Pascal Auquier;Michael Erhart;Angela Gosch

  • Development of the WHOQOL-Old module

    Mick Power;Kathryn Quinn;Silke Schmidt

  • Reliability, construct and criterion validity of the KIDSCREEN-10 score: A short measure for children and adolescents' well-being and health-related quality of life

    Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer;Michael Erhart;Luis Rajmil;Michael Herdman

  • The EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index: psychometric results of a cross-cultural field study.

    Silke Schmidt;Holger Mühlan;Mick Power

  • The KIDSCREEN-52 Quality of Life Measure for Children and Adolescents: Psychometric Results from a Cross-Cultural Survey in 13 European Countries

    Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer;Angela Gosch;Luis Rajmil;Michael Erhart

  • The World Health Organization WHOQOL-100: tests of the universality of Quality of Life in 15 different cultural groups worldwide.

    M. Power;M. Bullinger;A. Harper

  • Handbook of Cognition and Emotion: Dalgleish/Cognition and Emotion

    Tim Dalgleish;Mick J. Power

  • Quality of life in children and adolescents: a European public health perspective.

    Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer;Angela Gosch;Thomas Abel;Pascal Auquier

  • The attitudes to ageing questionnaire (AAQ): development and psychometric properties

    K. Laidlaw;M. J. Power;S. Schmidt

  • Impact of Major Depression and Subsyndromal Symptoms on Quality of Life and Attitudes Toward Aging in an International Sample of Older Adults

    Eduardo Chachamovich;Marcelo Fleck;Kenneth Laidlaw;Mick Power

  • The development of a measure of social support: the Significant Others (SOS) Scale.

    M. J. Power;L. A. Champion;S. J. Aris

  • The European DISABKIDS project: development of seven condition-specific modules to measure health related quality of life in children and adolescents

    Rolanda M Baars;Clare I Atherton;Hendrik M Koopman;Monika Bullinger

  • Testing the structural and cross-cultural validity of the KIDSCREEN-27 quality of life questionnaire

    Stephane Robitail;Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer;Marie-Claude Simeoni;Luis Rajmil

  • The Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (DAS): A comparison of forms A and B and proposals for a new subscaled version

    M.J. Power;R. Katz;P. McGuffin;C.F. Duggan

  • The EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index: comparative psychometric properties to its parent WHOQOL-BREF.

    Neusa Sica da Rocha;Mick J. Power;Donald M. Bushnell;Marcelo P. Fleck;Marcelo P. Fleck

  • Childhood trauma, dissociation and self-harming behaviour: a pilot study.

    Gail Low;David Jones;Andrew MaCleod;Mick Power

Frequent Co-Authors

Monika Bullinger
Monika Bullinger Universität Hamburg
Marcelo Pio de Almeida Fleck
Marcelo Pio de Almeida Fleck Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
Tim Dalgleish
Tim Dalgleish University of Cambridge
Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer
Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Silke Schmidt
Silke Schmidt University of Greifswald
Luis Rajmil
Luis Rajmil Government of Catalonia
Pascal Auquier
Pascal Auquier Aix-Marseille University
Marta Miret
Marta Miret Autonomous University of Madrid
Chris R. Brewin
Chris R. Brewin University College London
Willem Kuyken
Willem Kuyken University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of psychology opens up diverse career opportunities beyond traditional roles. Many students choose to pursue online degrees in counseling, which provide a flexible pathway to work in schools, healthcare, mental health clinics, and private practice.

When exploring counseling as a career, it’s important to consider accredited programs that meet state and national licensure requirements. For those seeking quality education in Ohio, the Cincinnati counseling degree programs and best college counseling programs in Cleveland offer strong foundations and clinical experiences.

Outside Ohio, top programs can be found nationwide. Students may want to explore the best counseling program rankings in Georgia or the top counseling degree programs in Iowa when considering out-of-state or online options.

These degrees are stepping stones to careers in mental health, school counseling, rehabilitation, and beyond. With growing demand for mental health professionals, earning a degree from a reputable program can help you build a rewarding and impactful career.

Best Scientists Citing Mick Power

Recently Published Articles