World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Leanne M. Williams

Leanne M. Williams

Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Best Female Scientists

D-Index
116
Citations
38745
World Ranking
686
National Ranking
417

Psychology

D-Index
117
Citations
40420
World Ranking
300
National Ranking
188

Neuroscience

D-Index
118
Citations
40758
World Ranking
414
National Ranking
245

Leanne M. Williams publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leanne M. Williams sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 503 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Leanne M. Williams D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leanne M. Williams sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 117 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award

Overview

Leanne M. Williams is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research spans several intersecting fields of study, primarily Neuroscience, Psychology, and Medicine. Within these broad domains, their work focuses heavily on subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Pharmacology, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

The scientist's main research topics include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Mental Health Research Topics, Treatment of Major Depression, and aspects of Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, and Cognitive Processes. Their studies also encompass Neural and Behavioral Psychology and investigations related to Tryptophan and brain disorders, as well as Stress Responses and Cortisol.

Williams has contributed to multiple recent papers, including:

  • Mapping Neural Circuit Biotypes to Symptoms and Behavioral Dimensions of Depression and Anxiety (2021, Biological Psychiatry)
  • Personalized brain circuit scores identify clinically distinct biotypes in depression and anxiety (2024, Nature Medicine)
  • The impact of COVID-19 on mental health: The interactive roles of brain biotypes and human connection (2020, Brain Behavior & Immunity - Health)
  • New and emerging approaches to treat psychiatric disorders (2023, Nature Medicine)
  • Reduced functional connectivity of default mode network subsystems in depression: Meta-analytic evidence and relationship with trait rumination (2021, NeuroImage Clinical)

The frequent venues where Williams has published include:

  • Biological Psychiatry
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research
  • Translational Psychiatry
  • Journal of Affective Disorders

Williams often collaborates with several coauthors, including Laura M. Hack, Xue Zhang, Jun Ma, Leonardo Tozzi, and Mayuresh S. Korgaonkar. These collaborations have contributed significantly to advancing research in mental health and neuroscience.

Best Publications

  • A direct brainstem–amygdala–cortical ‘alarm’ system for subliminal signals of fear

    Belinda J. Liddell;Kerri J. Brown;Andrew H. Kemp;Matthew J. Barton

  • Causal interactions between fronto-parietal central executive and default-mode networks in humans

    Ashley C. Chen;Desmond J. Oathes;Catie Chang;Travis Bradley

  • Resting-State Functional MRI: Everything That Nonexperts Have Always Wanted to Know.

    H. Lv;Z. Wang;E. Tong;L.M. Williams

  • Interactions between BDNF Val66Met polymorphism and early life stress predict brain and arousal pathways to syndromal depression and anxiety

    J. M. Gatt;Charles Nemeroff;C. Dobson-Stone;C. Dobson-Stone;C. Dobson-Stone;R. H. Paul

  • Precision psychiatry: a neural circuit taxonomy for depression and anxiety

    Leanne M Williams

  • Synchronous Gamma activity: a review and contribution to an integrative neuroscience model of schizophrenia

    Kwang-Hyuk Lee;Leanne M. Williams;Michael Breakspear;Evian Gordon

  • Early Life Stress and Morphometry of the Adult Anterior Cingulate Cortex and Caudate Nuclei

    Ronald A. Cohen;Stuart Grieve;Karin F. Hoth;Robert H. Paul

  • Small‐world properties of nonlinear brain activity in schizophrenia

    Mikail Rubinov;Stuart A. Knock;Cornelis J. Stam;Sifis Micheloyannis

  • The new field of ‘precision psychiatry’

    Brisa S. Fernandes;Brisa S. Fernandes;Brisa S. Fernandes;Leanne M. Williams;Leanne M. Williams;Johann Steiner;Marion Leboyer

  • Brain maturation in adolescence: concurrent changes in neuroanatomy and neurophysiology.

    Thomas J. Whitford;Christopher J. Rennie;Christopher J. Rennie;Stuart M. Grieve;C. Richard Clark

  • Cognitive Aging, Executive Function, and Fractional Anisotropy: A Diffusion Tensor MR Imaging Study

    S.M. Grieve;L.M. Williams;R.H. Paul;C.R. Clark

  • Trauma modulates amygdala and medial prefrontal responses to consciously attended fear

    Leanne M. Williams;Andrew H. Kemp;Andrew H. Kemp;Andrew H. Kemp;Kim Felmingham;Kim Felmingham;Matthew J. Barton

  • Face to face: visual scanpath evidence for abnormal processing of facial expressions in social phobia.

    Kaye Horley;Kaye Horley;Leanne M Williams;Leanne M Williams;Craig Gonsalvez;Evian Gordon;Evian Gordon

  • Widespread reductions in gray matter volume in depression.

    Stuart M. Grieve;Mayuresh S. Korgaonkar;Stephen H. Koslow;Evian Gordon

  • The Mellow Years?: Neural Basis of Improving Emotional Stability over Age

    Leanne M Williams;Kerri J Brown;Donna Palmer;Belinda J Liddell

  • Differential neural responses to overt and covert presentations of facial expressions of fear and disgust

    Mary L. Phillips;Leanne M. Williams;Maike Heining;Catherine M. Herba

  • Dysregulation of Arousal and Amygdala-Prefrontal Systems in Paranoid Schizophrenia

    Leanne M. Williams;Pritha Das;Anthony W.F. Harris;Belinda B. Liddell

  • Amygdala and ventral anterior cingulate activation predicts treatment response to cognitive behaviour therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder.

    RA Bryant;KL Felmingham;A Kemp;P Das

  • Abnormal structural networks characterize major depressive disorder: a connectome analysis.

    Mayuresh S. Korgaonkar;Alex Fornito;Leanne M. Williams;Stuart M. Grieve

  • Arousal dissociates amygdala and hippocampal fear responses: evidence from simultaneous fMRI and skin conductance recording.

    Leanne M. Williams;Mary L. Phillips;Michael J. Brammer;David Skerrett

Frequent Co-Authors

Evian Gordon
Evian Gordon University of Sydney
Anthony Harris
Anthony Harris University of Sydney
Mayuresh S. Korgaonkar
Mayuresh S. Korgaonkar University of Sydney
Stuart M. Grieve
Stuart M. Grieve University of Sydney
Richard A. Bryant
Richard A. Bryant University of New South Wales
Peter R. Schofield
Peter R. Schofield Neuroscience Research Australia
Andrew H. Kemp
Andrew H. Kemp Swansea University
C. Richard Clark
C. Richard Clark Flinders University
Kim L Felmingham
Kim L Felmingham University of Melbourne
Carol Dobson-Stone
Carol Dobson-Stone University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens up a diverse range of career opportunities in fields such as counseling, clinical research, education, and organizational psychology. There are various programs across the United States that cater to different interests, specializations, and career goals.

For those seeking inspiration on where to begin, the most popular psychology degree programs in Delaware highlight how different institutions offer unique online and in-person learning experiences. Similarly, the most popular psychology degree programs in Fort Worth showcase flexible pathways designed to meet the needs of working adults.

If you are focused on academic excellence, explore the top-ranked psychology degree programs in Kent for insights into nationally recognized departments. Alternatively, the popular psychology programs in Las Vegas emphasize programs that link classroom learning with real-world clinical and community placements.

No matter where you study, an online psychology degree can be a flexible, accessible stepping stone into dynamic and rewarding career pathways across the field of psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Leanne M. Williams

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles