World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
52
Citations
10866
World Ranking
5295
National Ranking
435

Philip W.J. Burnet publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip W.J. Burnet sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 122 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Philip W.J. Burnet D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip W.J. Burnet sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip W.J. Burnet is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple domains within medicine, neuroscience, and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. They have contributed substantially with 35 publications related to medicine, 26 in neuroscience, and 24 in biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology.

Their work covers several subfields, including molecular biology, physiology, biological psychiatry, behavioral neuroscience, and social psychology. Specific topics of focus in their research include gut microbiota and health, tryptophan and brain disorders, diet and metabolism studies, stress responses and cortisol, neuroendocrine regulation and behavior, gastrointestinal motility and disorders, and cannabis and cannabinoid research.

Recent papers by Philip W.J. Burnet include:

  • Microbial transmission in animal social networks and the social microbiome, 2020, Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • The Gut Microbiome and Schizophrenia: The Current State of the Field and Clinical Applications, 2020, Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • The role of the microbiome in the neurobiology of social behaviour, 2020, Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
  • Gut dysbiosis in severe mental illness and chronic fatigue: a novel trans-diagnostic construct? A systematic review and meta-analysis, 2021, Molecular Psychiatry
  • Nutrition and the ageing brain: Moving towards clinical applications, 2020, Ageing Research Reviews

Their research is frequently published in journals such as Frontiers in Psychiatry, Molecular Psychiatry, Scientific Reports, Frontiers in Microbiology, and Brain Behavior and Immunity.

Philip W.J. Burnet collaborates regularly with several researchers. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Belinda Lennox
  • Amedeo Minichino
  • Daniel C. Anthony
  • Daniel Radford-Smith
  • Fay Probert

Best Publications

  • Psychobiotics and the Manipulation of Bacteria-Gut-Brain Signals.

    Amar Sarkar;Soili M. Lehto;Siobhán Harty;Timothy G. Dinan

  • Prebiotic intake reduces the waking cortisol response and alters emotional bias in healthy volunteers

    Kristin Schmidt;Philip J. Cowen;Catherine J. Harmer;George Tzortzis

  • The relative importance of premortem acidosis and postmortem interval for human brain gene expression studies: selective mRNA vulnerability and comparison with their encoded proteins

    P.J. Harrison;P.R. Heath;S.L. Eastwood;P.W.J. Burnet

  • Prebiotic feeding elevates central brain derived neurotrophic factor, N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor subunits and d-serine

    Helene M. Savignac;Giulia Corona;Henrietta Mills;Li Chen

  • The distribution of 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptor mRNA in human brain

    P.W.J. Burnet;S.L. Eastwood;K. Lacey;P.J. Harrison

  • 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptor mRNAs and binding site densities are differentially altered in schizophrenia

    Philip W.J. Burnet;Sharon L. Eastwood;Paul J. Harrison

  • Altered synaptophysin expression as a marker of synaptic pathology in schizophrenia

    S.L. Eastwood;P.W.J. Burnet;P.J. Harrison

  • Decreased expression of mRNAs encoding non-NMDA glutamate receptors GluR1 and GluR2 in medial temporal lobe neurons in schizophrenia.

    Sharon L. Eastwood;Brendan McDonald;Philip W.J. Burnet;Jason P. Beckwith

  • Prebiotic administration normalizes lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced anxiety and cortical 5-HT2A receptor and IL1-β levels in male mice

    H M Savignac;Y Couch;M Stratford;D M Bannerman

  • The group II metabotropic glutamate receptor 3 (mGluR3, mGlu3, GRM3): expression, function and involvement in schizophrenia.

    P J Harrison;L Lyon;L J Sartorius;P W J Burnet

  • [3H]WAY-100635 for 5-HT1A receptor autoradiography in human brain: a comparison with [3H]8-OH-DPAT and demonstration of increased binding in the frontal cortex in schizophrenia.

    P.W.J Burnet;S.L Eastwood;P.J Harrison

  • d-Amino acid oxidase and serine racemase in human brain: normal distribution and altered expression in schizophrenia.

    Louise Verrall;Mary Walker;Nancy Rawlings;Isabel Benzel

  • The Microbiome in Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience.

    Amar Sarkar;Amar Sarkar;Siobhán Harty;Siobhán Harty;Soili M. Lehto;Soili M. Lehto;Andrew H. Moeller

  • The neurobiology of D -amino acid oxidase and its involvement in schizophrenia

    L Verrall;P W J Burnet;J F Betts;P J Harrison

  • RNA editing of the 5-HT(2C) receptor is reduced in schizophrenia

    M S Sodhi;P W J Burnet;Andrew Makoff;Robert Kerwin

  • Genetic variation of the 5-HT2A receptor and response to clozapine

    M.M. Nöthen;M. Rietschel;J. Erdmann;H. Oberländer

  • Expression of ZNF804A in Human Brain and Alterations in Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, and Major Depressive Disorder: A Novel Transcript Fetally Regulated by the Psychosis Risk Variant rs1344706

    Ran Tao;Helena Cousijn;Andrew E. Jaffe;Philip W. J. Burnet

  • GluR2 glutamate receptor subunit flip and flop isoforms are decreased in the hippocampal formation in schizophrenia : A reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) study

    Sharon L Eastwood;Philip W.J Burnet;Philip W.J Burnet;Paul J Harrison;Paul J Harrison

  • Characterization of glucagon-like peptide-1-(7–36)amide in the hypothalamus

    Bernhard Kreymann;Mohammed A. Ghatei;Philip Burnet;Gareth Williams

  • Gut dysbiosis in severe mental illness and chronic fatigue: a novel trans-diagnostic construct? A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Unknown

  • The effect of chronic imipramine administration on the densities of 5-HT1A and 5-HT2 receptors and the abundances of 5-HT receptor and transporter mRNA in the cortex, hippocampus and dorsal raphe of three strains of rat.

    Philip W.J. Burnet;David Michelson;Mark A. Smith;Philip W. Gold

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul J. Harrison
Paul J. Harrison University of Oxford
M. A. Ghatei
M. A. Ghatei Imperial College London
Philip J. Cowen
Philip J. Cowen University of Oxford
Daniel C. Anthony
Daniel C. Anthony University of Oxford
Catherine J. Harmer
Catherine J. Harmer University of Oxford
Trevor Sharp
Trevor Sharp University of Oxford
Robert Kerwin
Robert Kerwin King's College London
Andrea Cipriani
Andrea Cipriani University of Oxford
Robin I. M. Dunbar
Robin I. M. Dunbar University of Oxford
Philip W. Gold
Philip W. Gold National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience opens the door to a variety of fulfilling career paths, many of which intersect with psychology, counseling, and social work. For students interested in exploring human behavior and mental health alongside brain science, pursuing psychology degrees online can be an affordable and flexible option. These programs offer solid foundations in research, analysis, and critical thinking.

Those seeking roles in clinical or community settings may consider advancing their education through msw programs, which train professionals to serve individuals and families within a mental health context. Alternatively, if your goal is to become a licensed psychologist, a doctorate may be required—some of the cheapest psyd programs offer online learning and a practical approach for aspiring clinicians.

Another pathway includes counseling, where you can earn credentials through mft online degrees that focus on marriage and family therapy. With flexible online degree options available, students can tailor their academic journey to best fit their career aspirations in neuroscience and mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Philip W.J. Burnet

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles