World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
44
Citations
6833
World Ranking
7211
National Ranking
207

Elizabeth Scarr publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth Scarr sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 163 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Elizabeth Scarr D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth Scarr sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Elizabeth Scarr is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and neuroscience. These areas encompass both broad and specialized topics such as molecular biology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, genetics, psychiatry and mental health, and behavioral neuroscience.

Their work addresses key research topics including receptor mechanisms and signaling, neuroscience and neuropharmacology, genetic associations and epidemiology, schizophrenia research and treatment, ion channel regulation and function, neuropeptides and animal physiology, and stress responses and cortisol.

Elizabeth Scarr has coauthored publications with several frequent collaborators, including Brian Dean, Natalie Matosin, Janine Arloth, Anna S. Fröhlich, and Karolina Worf.

Publication venues where Elizabeth Scarr's work appears frequently include Psychiatry Research, Schizophrenia Research, The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and Acta Neuropathologica.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Elizabeth Scarr are:

  • Muscarinic M1 and M4 receptors: Hypothesis driven drug development for schizophrenia, 2020, Psychiatry Research
  • Associations of psychiatric disease and ageing with FKBP5 expression converge on superficial layer neurons of the neocortex, 2023, Acta Neuropathologica
  • Changes in cortical gene expression in the muscarinic M1 receptor knockout mouse: potential relevance to schizophrenia, Alzheimer's disease and cognition, 2021, Schizophrenia
  • Evidence that a working memory cognitive phenotype within schizophrenia has a unique underlying biology., 2022, Psychiatry Research
  • Common changes in rat cortical gene expression after chronic treatment with chlorpromazine and haloperidol may be related to their antipsychotic efficacy, 2022, Neuroscience Applied

Best Publications

  • Studies on [3H]CP-55940 binding in the human central nervous system: regional specific changes in density of cannabinoid-1 receptors associated with schizophrenia and cannabis use.

    Brian Dean;Suresh Sundram;R Bradbury;Elizabeth Scarr

  • Autophagy has a key role in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia.

    A Merenlender-Wagner;A Malishkevich;Z Shemer;M Udawela

  • Decreased muscarinic1 receptors in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of subjects with schizophrenia.

    Brian Dean;Mark McLeod;D Keriakous;J McKenzie

  • Changes in serotonin2A and GABA(A) receptors in schizophrenia: studies on the human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

    Brian Dean;Tabasum Hussain;Wendy Hayes;Elizabeth Scarr

  • Clozapine reverses schizophrenia-related behaviours in the metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 knockout mouse: association with N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor up-regulation.

    Laura Gray;Maarten van den Buuse;Elizabeth Scarr;Elizabeth Scarr;Brian Dean;Brian Dean

  • Decreased NR1, NR2A, and SAP102 transcript expression in the hippocampus in bipolar disorder

    Robert E. McCullumsmith;Lars V. Kristiansen;Monica Beneyto;Elizabeth Scarr

  • Biomarkers in schizophrenia: A focus on blood based diagnostics and theranostics.

    Chi-Yu Lai;Elizabeth Scarr;Madhara Udawela;Ian Everall

  • Biomarkers for psychiatry: The journey from fantasy to fact, a report of the 2013 CINP think tank

    Elizabeth Scarr;Mark J. Millan;Sabine Bahn;Alessandro Bertolino

  • The effect of estrogen on dopamine and serotonin receptor and transporter levels in the brain: An autoradiography study

    Carolina Chavez;Marianne Hollaus;Elizabeth Scarr;Elizabeth Scarr;Geoff Pavey

  • Decreased cortical muscarinic receptors define a subgroup of subjects with schizophrenia

    E Scarr;E Scarr;T F Cowie;S Kanellakis;S Sundram;S Sundram;S Sundram

  • Phospholipase C-β1 knockout mice exhibit endophenotypes modeling schizophrenia which are rescued by environmental enrichment and clozapine administration

    CE McOmish;E Burrows;M Howard;E Scarr;E Scarr

  • Decreased hippocampal NMDA, but not kainate or AMPA receptors in bipolar disorder.

    Elizabeth Scarr;Geoffrey Pavey;Suresh Sundram;Andrew J Mackinnon

  • Increased levels of SNAP-25 and synaptophysin in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in bipolar I disorder.

    Elizabeth Scarr;Elizabeth Scarr;Laura Gray;Laura Gray;Dahlia Keriakous;Philip J Robinson

  • Muscarinic receptors: do they have a role in the pathology and treatment of schizophrenia?

    Elizabeth Scarr;Elizabeth Scarr;Brian Dean

  • Regionally-specific changes in levels of tumour necrosis factor in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex obtained postmortem from subjects with major depressive disorder.

    Brian Dean;Nahed Tawadros;Nahed Tawadros;Elizabeth Scarr;Elizabeth Scarr;Andrew S. Gibbons;Andrew S. Gibbons

  • Cholinergic connectivity: it's implications for psychiatric disorders.

    Elizabeth Scarr;Andrew Stuart Gibbons;Jaclyn Neo;Madhara Udawela

  • Muscarinic receptors: their roles in disorders of the central nervous system and potential as therapeutic targets.

    Elizabeth Scarr

  • Altered Hippocampal Muscarinic M4, but Not M1, Receptor Expression from Subjects with Schizophrenia

    Elizabeth Scarr;Suresh Sundram;Dahlia Keriakous;Brian Dean

  • Decreased muscarinic receptor binding in the frontal cortex of bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder subjects

    A S Gibbons;E Scarr;E Scarr;Catriona Ann McLean;Suresh Sundram;Suresh Sundram

  • Different changes in cortical tumor necrosis factor-α-related pathways in schizophrenia and mood disorders

    B Dean;A S Gibbons;N Tawadros;L Brooks

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian Dean
Brian Dean Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health
Elizabeth A. Thomas
Elizabeth A. Thomas University of California, Irvine
Anthony J. Hannan
Anthony J. Hannan Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health
Christos Pantelis
Christos Pantelis University of Melbourne
Galila Agam
Galila Agam Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Genevieve Evin
Genevieve Evin University of Melbourne
Maarten van den Buuse
Maarten van den Buuse La Trobe University
James H. Meador-Woodruff
James H. Meador-Woodruff University of Alabama at Birmingham
Olivia M. Dean
Olivia M. Dean Deakin University
Robert E. McCullumsmith
Robert E. McCullumsmith University of Cincinnati

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can lead you to several exciting online education routes and professional opportunities. Many students kickstart their journey by pursuing online certificate programs that pay well and offer specialized knowledge. These programs are ideal for those looking to gain practical skills quickly and stand out in competitive job markets.

If you want flexible learning, you might appreciate the online courses that cover foundational topics in neuroscience and related fields. Such courses are often designed to be accessible and manageable alongside work or other commitments.

Graduate study is another popular pathway for those interested in clinical or research careers. You can access some of the most affordable online MSW programs for those wanting to blend neuroscience with social work. Alternatively, those interested in behavioral sciences and therapy may consider bcba programs online to become a Board Certified Behavior Analyst.

In summary, online learning offers diverse, flexible, and often affordable paths for advancing your neuroscience education and career.

Best Scientists Citing Elizabeth Scarr

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles