World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
47
Citations
29493
World Ranking
6284
National Ranking
43

Galila Agam publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Galila Agam sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 229 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Galila Agam D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Galila Agam sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Galila Agam is affiliated with Ben-Gurion University of the Negev in Israel. Their research primarily falls within the broad field of Medicine, with significant contributions to subfields including Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Biological Psychiatry, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Genetics.

Their scholarly work covers a range of topics, notably:

  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Climate Change and Health Impacts

Galila Agam has coauthored numerous papers with recurring collaborators, including Odeya Damri, Serena Asslih, Nofar Shemesh, Sarya Natur, and S. Natour.

Their publications appear frequently in specific academic journals, such as:

  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Scientific Reports
  • Molecular Psychiatry

Selected recent publications by Galila Agam include:

  • Neuroinflammation as a Common Denominator of Complex Diseases (Cancer, Diabetes Type 2, and Neuropsychiatric Disorders), 2021, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Is There Justification to Treat Neurodegenerative Disorders by Repurposing Drugs? The Case of Alzheimer's Disease, Lithium, and Autophagy, 2020, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • The Effect of Global Warming on Complex Disorders (Mental Disorders, Primary Hypertension, and Type 2 Diabetes), 2022, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Mitochondrial function parameters as a tool for tailored drug treatment of an individual with psychosis: a proof of concept study, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Does treatment with autophagy-enhancers and/or ROS-scavengers alleviate behavioral and neurochemical consequences of low-dose rotenone-induced mild mitochondrial dysfunction in mice?, 2023, Molecular Psychiatry

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz;Sara Abdelfatah;Mahmoud Abdellatif

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Major depressive disorder.

    R H Belmaker;Galila Agam

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • A CSF and postmortem brain study of D-serine metabolic parameters in schizophrenia.

    Inna Bendikov;Carmit Nadri;Shirly Amar;Rogerio Panizzutti

  • Erratum to: Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition) (Autophagy, 12, 1, 1-222, 10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Individual differences in allocation of funds in the dictator game associated with length of the arginine vasopressin 1a receptor RS3 promoter region and correlation between RS3 length and hippocampal mRNA

    A Knafo;S Israel;A Darvasi;R Bachner-Melman

  • Low GSK-3beta immunoreactivity in postmortem frontal cortex of schizophrenic patients.

    Nitsan Kozlovsky;R.H. Belmaker;Galila Agam

  • Autophagy has a key role in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia.

    A Merenlender-Wagner;A Malishkevich;Z Shemer;M Udawela

  • Reduced frontal cortex inositol levels in postmortem brain of suicide victims and patients with bipolar disorder.

    Hady Shimon;Galila Agam;R. H. Belmaker;Thomas M. Hyde

  • Search for a common mechanism of mood stabilizers.

    Adrian J. Harwood;Galila Agam

  • The mechanism of lithium action: state of the art, ten years later.

    Alona Shaldubina;Galila Agam;Robert H. Belmaker

  • GSK-3 and the neurodevelopmental hypothesis of schizophrenia

    Nitsan Kozlovsky;R.H Belmaker;R.H Belmaker;Galila Agam

  • Low GSK-3 activity in frontal cortex of schizophrenic patients

    N. Kozlovsky;R.H. Belmaker;G. Agam

  • Valproate decreases inositol biosynthesis

    Galit Shaltiel;Alon Shamir;Joseph Shapiro;Daobin Ding

  • Antidepressive-like effects of rapamycin in animal models: Implications for mTOR inhibition as a new target for treatment of affective disorders.

    C. Cleary;J.A.S. Linde;K.M. Hiscock;I. Hadas

  • Dual Role of Autophagy in Diseases of the Central Nervous System.

    Tamara Bar-Yosef;Odeya Damri;Galila Agam

  • Inositol treatment raises CSF inositol levels.

    J. Levine;A. Rapaport;L. Lev;Y. Bersudsky

  • Reduced GSK-3β mRNA levels in postmortem dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of schizophrenic patients

    N. Kozlovsky;C. Shanon-Weickert;E. Tomaskovic-Crook;J. E. Kleinman

  • HOW DOES LITHIUM WORK ON MANIC DEPRESSION? Clinical and Psychological Correlates of the Inositol Theory

    R. H. Belmaker;Yuly Bersudsky;Galila Agam;Joseph Levine

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert H. Belmaker
Robert H. Belmaker Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Richard P. Ebstein
Richard P. Ebstein Southwestern University of Finance and Economics
Haim Einat
Haim Einat Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Brian Dean
Brian Dean Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health
Sergio Lavandero
Sergio Lavandero University of Chile
Evelina Gatti
Evelina Gatti Aix-Marseille University
Boris Zhivotovsky
Boris Zhivotovsky Karolinska Institute
Philippe Pierre
Philippe Pierre Aix-Marseille University
Beth Levine
Beth Levine The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Maurizio Molinari
Maurizio Molinari Universita della Svizzera Italiana

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in neuroscience, exploring related degrees and online education can help broaden your expertise and open up diverse career pathways. Many students pursue psychology or counseling programs to complement their neuroscience background, or to prepare for a variety of roles in mental health, research, and therapy.

Consider the flexibility of an lmft degree online to become a licensed marriage and family therapist with a neuroscience focus. Alternatively, future clinical psychologists often ask: how much does it cost to get a masters in psychology? Understanding tuition and financial aid options is crucial to making informed decisions.

A popular option for many students is an online psychology degree, which often provides foundational knowledge applicable to neuroscience careers. For those interested in social work and advocacy, msw programs online can lead to impactful roles in community health or policy.

Exploring these related programs can help you find a pathway that aligns with your interests, budget, and career goals in neuroscience or the broader behavioral health field.

Best Scientists Citing Galila Agam

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles