World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 44 7215 6647 54 51 156 6744

Haim Einat publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Haim Einat between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Haim Einat published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 5.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2019. 10 of the 170 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2019. 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 2 publications
1993 2025

170 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Haim Einat: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 2
1994 1
1995 1
1996 1
1997 2
1998 6
1999 3
2000 5
2001 6
2002 4
2003 3
2004 4
2005 3
2006 4
2007 12
2008 8
2009 5
2010 6
2011 4
2012 6
2013 3
2014 4
2015 6
2016 6
2017 4
2018 6
2019 13
2020 7
2021 8
2022 10
2023 7
2024 8
2025 2
Total 170
Download as CSV

Haim Einat publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Haim Einat sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 148–157 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 156 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459 156
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Haim Einat D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Haim Einat sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478 44
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Haim Einat is affiliated with Ben-Gurion University of the Negev in Israel. Their research spans the fields of Psychology and Neuroscience, with a substantial focus on subfields such as Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Physiology, and Social Psychology.

The primary research topics covered by Einat include:

  • Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Sleep and related disorders
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
  • Dietary Effects on Health
  • Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment

Einat's frequent publication venues showcase the scope of their work and include:

  • Neuroscience Applied
  • Scientific Reports
  • European Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Chronobiology International
  • Acta Neuropsychiatrica

Some of the recent papers associated with Haim Einat are:

  • "New Approaches to Modeling Bipolar Disorder," 2025, Psychopharmacology Bulletin
  • "The circadian syndrome predicts cardiovascular disease better than metabolic syndrome in Chinese adults," 2020, Journal of Internal Medicine
  • "Revisiting the validity of the mouse tail suspension test: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of prototypic antidepressants," 2020, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • "The Circadian Syndrome Is a Significant and Stronger Predictor for Cardiovascular Disease than the Metabolic Syndrome-The NHANES Survey during 2005-2016," 2022, Nutrients
  • "Differential effects of COVID-19 lockdowns on well-being: interaction between age, gender and chronotype," 2021, Journal of The Royal Society Interface

Frequent co-authors working with Einat include:

  • Noga Kronfeld-Schor
  • Anat Lan
  • Carmel Bilu
  • Yelena Stukalin
  • Paul Zimmet

Best Publications

  • The role of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase signaling pathway in mood modulation.

    Haim Einat;Peixiong Yuan;Todd D. Gould;Jianling Li

  • AR-A014418, a selective GSK-3 inhibitor, produces antidepressant-like effects in the forced swim test.

    Todd D. Gould;Haim Einat;Ratan Bhat;Husseini K. Manji

  • The Circadian Syndrome: is the Metabolic Syndrome and much more!

    P. Zimmet;K. G. M. M. Alberti;N. Stern;C. Bilu

  • Circadian rhythms and depression: Human psychopathology and animal models

    Noga Kronfeld-Schor;Haim Einat

  • Modulation of Synaptic Plasticity by Antimanic Agents: The Role of AMPA Glutamate Receptor Subunit 1 Synaptic Expression

    Jing Du;Neil A. Gray;Cynthia A. Falke;Wenxin Chen

  • Cellular plasticity cascades: genes-to-behavior pathways in animal models of bipolar disorder.

    Haim Einat;Husseini K. Manji

  • Increased anxiety-like behaviors and mitochondrial dysfunction in mice with targeted mutation of the Bcl-2 gene: further support for the involvement of mitochondrial function in anxiety disorders.

    Haim Einat;Peixiong Yuan;Husseini K. Manji

  • β-Catenin Overexpression in the Mouse Brain Phenocopies Lithium-Sensitive Behaviors

    Todd D Gould;Haim Einat;Haim Einat;Kelley C O'Donnell;Alyssa M Picchini;Alyssa M Picchini

  • Antidepressive-like effects of rapamycin in animal models: Implications for mTOR inhibition as a new target for treatment of affective disorders.

    C. Cleary;J.A.S. Linde;K.M. Hiscock;I. Hadas

  • Animal models of bipolar disorder and mood stabilizer efficacy: a critical need for improvement.

    Todd D. Gould;Haim Einat

  • Revisiting the validity of the mouse forced swim test: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of prototypic antidepressants.

    N.Z. Kara;Y. Stukalin;H. Einat;H. Einat

  • Sand rats see the light: short photoperiod induces a depression-like response in a diurnal rodent.

    Haim Einat;Noga Kronfeld-Schor;David Eilam

  • Longlasting consequences of chronic treatment with the dopamine agonist quinpirole for the undrugged behavior of rats.

    Haim Einat;Henry Szechtman

  • The Circadian Syndrome Predicts Cardiovascular Disease Better than Metabolic Syndrome in Chinese Adults

    Zumin Shi;Jaakko Tuomilehto;Noga Kronfeld-Schor;George Alberti

  • We are in the dark here: induction of depression- and anxiety-like behaviours in the diurnal fat sand rat, by short daylight or melatonin injections

    Tal Ashkenazy;Haim Einat;Noga Kronfeld-Schor

  • Modelling facets of mania--new directions related to the notion of endophenotypes.

    Haim Einat

  • Establishment of a battery of simple models for facets of bipolar disorder: a practical approach to achieve increased validity, better screening and possible insights into endophenotypes of disease.

    Haim Einat

  • Effects of dose and interdose interval on locomotor sensitization to the dopamine agonist quinpirole.

    Henry Szechtman;Hugh Dai;Shahzad Mustafa;Haim Einat

  • Effects of bright light treatment on depression- and anxiety-like behaviors of diurnal rodents maintained on a short daylight schedule.

    Tal Ashkenazy;Haim Einat;Noga Kronfeld-Schor

  • The antidepressant activity of inositol in the forced swim test involves 5-HT2 receptors

    H Einat;F Clenet;A Shaldubina;R.H Belmaker

  • It is darkness and not light: Depression-like behaviors of diurnal unstriped Nile grass rats maintained under a short photoperiod schedule.

    Tal Ashkenazy-Frolinger;Noga Kronfeld-Schor;Jesse Juetten;Haim Einat

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert H. Belmaker
Robert H. Belmaker Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Galila Agam
Galila Agam Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Husseini K. Manji
Husseini K. Manji National Institutes of Health
Henry Szechtman
Henry Szechtman McMaster University
Todd D. Gould
Todd D. Gould University of Maryland, Baltimore
Paul Zimmet
Paul Zimmet Monash University
Assam El-Osta
Assam El-Osta Monash University
Trevor W. Robbins
Trevor W. Robbins University of Cambridge
Keith H. Nuechterlein
Keith H. Nuechterlein University of California, Los Angeles
Jared W. Young
Jared W. Young University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Neuroscience in the USA opens doors to a variety of related fields and flexible career paths. Many students explore adjacent disciplines like social work, applied behavior analysis, and psychology to broaden their expertise or pursue specialized roles. For those interested in mental health and community services, msw online programs provide an accessible route to a Master of Social Work, often at a lower cost. If you are aiming for a faster graduation timeline, consider accelerated msw programs online to kickstart your career quickly.

A popular pathway for aspiring behavior analysts is through bcba masters programs online. These online degrees are designed for those seeking certification and expertise in behavioral therapy, making them ideal for complementary roles in neuroscience or education. Additionally, a fast track psychology degree can help you develop a robust foundation in human behavior and cognition, central themes in neuroscience.

Exploring these online degrees lets you balance academic goals with work or family commitments while moving forward on rewarding neuroscience-related career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Haim Einat

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles