World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
53
Citations
8977
World Ranking
5145
National Ranking
32

Gal Yadid publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gal Yadid sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 174 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Gal Yadid D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gal Yadid sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gal Yadid is affiliated with Bar-Ilan University in Israel and conducts research primarily in the fields of Neuroscience, Medicine, and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their work spans several subfields, including Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Clinical Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, and Developmental Neuroscience.

Their research focuses on diverse topics related to brain function, behavior, and molecular mechanisms. Main areas of interest include:

  • Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Neurogenesis and Neuroplasticity Mechanisms
  • Nerve Injury and Regeneration
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Hormonal and Reproductive Studies

Gal Yadid has published in several scientific journals with notable frequency in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences, alongside Psychiatry Research, Translational Psychiatry, Molecular Psychiatry, and General and Comparative Endocrinology.

Some recent research papers by Gal Yadid or closely associated with their group include:

  • Who becomes addicted and to what? Psychosocial predictors of substance and behavioral addictive disorders, 2020, Psychiatry Research
  • RNA editing of the 5-HT2C receptor in the central nucleus of the amygdala is involved in resilience behavior, 2021, Translational Psychiatry
  • Reduction of DNMT3a and RORA in the nucleus accumbens plays a causal role in post-traumatic stress disorder-like behavior: reversal by combinatorial epigenetic therapy, 2021, Molecular Psychiatry
  • Discovering the Lost Reward: Critical Locations for Endocannabinoid Modulation of the Cortico-Striatal Loop That Are Implicated in Major Depression, 2021, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Sex differences in testosterone reactivity and sensitivity in a non-model gerbil, 2020, General and Comparative Endocrinology

The scientist has collaborated extensively with several co-authors, including Gal Warhaftig, Tzofnat Bareli, Hilla Pe'er-Nissan, Iris Gispan, and Hadas Levi Ahdoot, with repeated co-authorship occurrences indicating ongoing research partnerships.

Best Publications

  • The Flinders Sensitive Line rat: a selectively bred putative animal model of depression.

    David H. Overstreet;Elliot Friedman;Aleksander A. Mathé;Gal Yadid

  • Heterogeneous neurochemical responses to different stressors: a test of Selye’s doctrine of nonspecificity

    Karel Pacak;Miklos Palkovits;Gal Yadid;Richard Kvetnansky

  • In Vivo Neuroimaging of Exosomes Using Gold Nanoparticles

    Oshra Betzer;Nisim Perets;Ariel Angel;Menachem Motiei

  • The effect of nanoparticle size on the ability to cross the blood–brain barrier: an in vivo study

    Oshra Betzer;Malka Shilo;Renana Opochinsky;Eran Barnoy

  • Elucidation of the neurobiology of depression: insights from a novel genetic animal model.

    Gal Yadid;Rachel Nakash;Ilana Deri;Grin Tamar

  • Association between depressive behavior and absence of serotonin–dopamine interaction in the nucleus accumbens

    Abraham Zangen;Rachel Nakash;David H. Overstreet;Gal Yadid

  • High Serotonin and 5‐Hydroxyindoleacetic Acid Levels in Limbic Brain Regions in a Rat Model of Depression; Normalization by Chronic Antidepressant Treatment

    Abraham Zangen;David H. Overstreet;Gal Yadid

  • Effects of Various Stressors on In Vivo Norepinephrine Release in the Hypothalamic Paraventricular Nucleus and on the Pituitary-Adrenocortical Axis

    Karel Pacák;Miklos Palkovits;Richard Kvetňansky;Gal Yadid

  • Dynamics of the dopaminergic system as a key component to the understanding of depression.

    Gal Yadid;Alexander Friedman

  • Protective effect of MK801 in experimental brain injury.

    Y. Shapira;G. Yadid;S. Cotev;A. Niska

  • Brain Phospholipase A2 Is Activated After Experimental Closed Head Injury in the Rat

    E. Shohami;Y. Shapira;G. Yadid;N. Reisfeld

  • Electrical stimulation of the lateral habenula produces enduring inhibitory effect on cocaine seeking behavior.

    Alexander Friedman;Elad Lax;Yahav Dikshtein;Lital Abraham

  • Limbic dopaminergic adaptation to a stressful stimulus in a rat model of depression.

    Gal Yadid;David H. Overstreet;Abraham Zangen

  • Role of DNA Methylation in the Nucleus Accumbens in Incubation of Cocaine Craving

    Renaud Massart;Royi Barnea;Yahav Dikshtein;Matthew Suderman

  • Increased catecholamine levels in specific brain regions of a rat model of depression: normalization by chronic antidepressant treatment.

    Abraham Zangen;David H. Overstreet;Gal Yadid

  • Beta-endorphin and drug-induced reward and reinforcement.

    Ilana Roth-Deri;Tamar Green-Sadan;Gal Yadid

  • The serotonin-dopamine interaction is critical for fast-onset action of antidepressant treatment: in vivo studies in an animal model of depression.

    Eliyahu Dremencov;Iris Gispan-Herman;Merav Rosenstein;Avivit Mendelman

  • Mesenchymal stem cells increase hippocampal neurogenesis and counteract depressive-like behavior.

    M Tfilin;E Sudai;A Merenlender;I Gispan

  • Electrical stimulation of the lateral habenula produces an inhibitory effect on sucrose self-administration

    Alexander Friedman;Elad Lax;Yahav Dikshtein;Lital Abraham

  • Hyperfunctionality of serotonin-2C receptor-mediated inhibition of accumbal dopamine release in an animal model of depression is reversed by antidepressant treatment.

    Eliyahu Dremencov;Michael E. Newman;Noa Kinor;Gitit Blatman-Jan

  • Endogenous serotonin stimulates striatal dopamine release in conscious rats.

    Gal Yadid;K. Pacak;I. J. Kopin;D. S. Goldstein

  • Programmed acute electrical stimulation of ventral tegmental area alleviates depressive-like behavior.

    Alexander Friedman;Michael Frankel;Yakov Flaumenhaft;Avia Merenlender

Frequent Co-Authors

David H. Overstreet
David H. Overstreet University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Abraham Weizman
Abraham Weizman Tel Aviv University
Abraham Zangen
Abraham Zangen Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Aron Weller
Aron Weller Bar-Ilan University
Irwin J. Kopin
Irwin J. Kopin National Institutes of Health
David S. Goldstein
David S. Goldstein National Institutes of Health
Karel Pacak
Karel Pacak National Institutes of Health
Moshe Szyf
Moshe Szyf McGill University
Chaya Brodie
Chaya Brodie Henry Ford Health System
Benjamin Sredni
Benjamin Sredni Bar-Ilan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Gal Yadid

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles