World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Sweden
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
72
Citations
25725
World Ranking
1652
National Ranking
4

John Hughes publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Hughes sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 211 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

John Hughes D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Hughes sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Computer Science in Sweden Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Sweden Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in Sweden Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Sweden Leader Award

Overview

John Hughes is affiliated with Chalmers University of Technology in Sweden. Their research primarily focuses on the domain of computer science with particular attention to software engineering and related subfields.

The main fields of study covered in their work include:

  • Computer Science

Their work spans several subfields within this broader area, including:

  • Information Systems
  • Software
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Signal Processing
  • Information Systems and Management

Research topics prominently featured in their publications encompass:

  • Software Engineering Research
  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
  • Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Web Application Security Vulnerabilities

John Hughes has contributed to recent scholarly publications, including:

  • "Exploring API behaviours through generated examples", 2024, Software Quality Journal
  • "Exploring API Behaviours Through Generated Examples", 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)

The researcher often collaborates with a consistent group of co-authors, which includes:

  • Leonidas Lampropoulos
  • Benjamin C. Pierce
  • Robbert Jongeling
  • Adnan Čaušević
  • Daniel Sundmark

John Hughes has regularly published in venues such as:

  • Software Quality Journal
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Best Publications

  • Report on the programming language Haskell: a non-strict, purely functional language version 1.2

    Paul Hudak;Simon Peyton Jones;Philip Wadler;Brian Boutel

  • Why functional programming matters

    J. Hughes

  • QuickCheck: a lightweight tool for random testing of Haskell programs

    Koen Claessen;John Hughes

  • QuickCheck: a lightweight tool for random testing of Haskell programs

    Unknown

  • Introduction to Computer Graphics

    James D. Foley;Richard L. Phillips;John F. Hughes;Andries van Dam

  • SKETCH: an interface for sketching 3D scenes

    Robert C. Zeleznik;Kenneth P. Herndon;John F. Hughes

  • As-rigid-as-possible shape manipulation

    Takeo Igarashi;Tomer Moscovich;John F. Hughes

  • Direct manipulation of free-form deformations

    William M. Hsu;John F. Hughes;Henry Kaufman

  • Computer graphics: principles and practice (2nd ed.)

    James D. Foley;Andries van Dam;Steven K. Feiner;John F. Hughes

  • Generalising monads to arrows

    John Hughes

  • Sculpting: an interactive volumetric modeling technique

    Tinsley A. Galyean;John F. Hughes

  • Real-time nonphotorealistic rendering

    Lee Markosian;Michael A. Kowalski;Daniel Goldstein;Samuel J. Trychin

  • Orientable textures for image-based pen-and-ink illustration

    Michael P. Salisbury;Michael T. Wong;John F. Hughes;David H. Salesin

  • A history of Haskell: being lazy with class

    Paul Hudak;John Hughes;Simon Peyton Jones;Philip Wadler

  • Proving the correctness of reactive systems using sized types

    John Hughes;Lars Pareto;Amr Sabry

  • WYSIWYG NPR: drawing strokes directly on 3D models

    Robert D. Kalnins;Lee Markosian;Barbara J. Meier;Michael A. Kowalski

  • Report on the Programming Language Haskell, A Non-strict, Purely Functional Language.

    Paul Hudak;Simon L. Peyton Jones;Philip Wadler;Brian Boutel

  • SmoothSketch: 3D free-form shapes from complex sketches

    Olga A. Karpenko;John F. Hughes

  • A suggestive interface for 3D drawing

    Takeo Igarashi;John F. Hughes

  • Multiperspective panoramas for cel animation

    Daniel N. Wood;Adam Finkelstein;John F. Hughes;Craig E. Thayer

  • Scheduled Fourier volume morphing

    John F. Hughes

Frequent Co-Authors

Koen Claessen
Koen Claessen Chalmers University of Technology
Takeo Igarashi
Takeo Igarashi University of Tokyo
Benjamin C. Pierce
Benjamin C. Pierce University of Pennsylvania
Simon Jones
Simon Jones Microsoft (United States)
Robert C. Zeleznik
Robert C. Zeleznik Brown University
James D. Foley
James D. Foley Georgia Institute of Technology
Steven Feiner
Steven Feiner Columbia University
Philip Wadler
Philip Wadler University of Edinburgh
Marie-Paule Cani
Marie-Paule Cani École Polytechnique

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Computer Science opens up a world of opportunities, especially with the rise of online education. Students who prefer flexibility can now access some of the best online degrees that combine high earning potential with quick completion times.

If you're fascinated by cutting-edge fields, consider specialized programs such as AI degree programs. These courses offer advanced knowledge in artificial intelligence and machine learning—desired skills for tomorrow’s tech landscape.

Unsure which area to focus on? Researching the best majors for the future helps identify which degrees align with growing job markets, ensuring strong career prospects after graduation.

For those seeking faster advancement, pursuing one of the easiest online masters can be a great next step. These programs provide additional credentials without putting your career on hold, making postgraduate education more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing John Hughes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles