World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 43 7488 6904 61 59 120 5442

Josiane Budni publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Josiane Budni between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Josiane Budni published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 7.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2013. 13 of the 141 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2013. 2006: 2 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 4 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 7 publications
2006 2025

141 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Josiane Budni: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 2
2007 5
2008 3
2009 1
2010 4
2011 3
2012 8
2013 14
2014 8
2015 12
2016 8
2017 10
2018 11
2019 5
2020 5
2021 14
2022 8
2023 7
2024 6
2025 7
Total 141
Download as CSV

Josiane Budni publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Josiane Budni sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 118–127 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 120 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522 120
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Josiane Budni D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Josiane Budni sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467 43
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Josiane Budni is affiliated with the Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense in Brazil. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience and medicine, with an emphasis on subfields such as biological psychiatry, neurology, behavioral neuroscience, pharmacology, and physiology.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms
  • Stress responses and cortisol
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Cholinesterase and neurodegenerative diseases
  • Vitamin D research studies
  • Intensive care unit cognitive disorders

Josiane Budni has published extensively across various scientific journals, with frequent publication venues including:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Metabolic Brain Disease
  • Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Molecular Neurobiology

Some of their recent papers are:

  • "The role of CREB and BDNF in neurobiology and treatment of Alzheimer's disease," 2020, Life Sciences
  • "Inflammatory Cascade in Alzheimer's Disease Pathogenesis: A Review of Experimental Findings," 2021, Cells
  • "A single administration of ascorbic acid rapidly reverses depressive-like behavior and hippocampal synaptic dysfunction induced by corticosterone in mice," 2021, Chemico-Biological Interactions
  • "Ouabain induces memory impairment and alter the BDNF signaling pathway in an animal model of bipolar disorder," 2020, Journal of Affective Disorders
  • "The involvement of neuroinflammation in an animal model of dementia and depression," 2024, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry

They have collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Eduarda Behenck Medeiros
  • Gabriel Casagrande Zabot
  • Jade de Oliveira
  • Michelle Lima Garcez
  • Matheus Scarpatto Rodrigues

Best Publications

  • The involvement of BDNF, NGF and GDNF in aging and Alzheimer's disease.

    Josiane Budni;Tatiani Bellettini-Santos;Francielle Mina;Michelle Lima Garcez

  • The role of CREB and BDNF in neurobiology and treatment of Alzheimer's disease

    Meysam Amidfar;Jade de Oliveira;Ewa Kucharska;Josiane Budni

  • Ascorbic acid treatment, similarly to fluoxetine, reverses depressive-like behavior and brain oxidative damage induced by chronic unpredictable stress.

    Morgana Moretti;André Colla;Grasiela de Oliveira Balen;Danúbia Bonfanti dos Santos

  • Folic acid administration produces an antidepressant-like effect in mice: evidence for the involvement of the serotonergic and noradrenergic systems.

    Patrícia S. Brocardo;Josiane Budni;Manuella P. Kaster;Adair R.S. Santos

  • Nrf2 participates in depressive disorders through an anti-inflammatory mechanism

    María Dolores Martín-de-Saavedra;Josiane Budni;Mauricio P. Cunha;Vanessa Gómez-Rangel

  • Guanosine protects human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells against mitochondrial oxidative stress by inducing heme oxigenase-1 via PI3K/Akt/GSK-3β pathway.

    Tharine Dal-Cim;Simone Molz;Javier Egea;Esther Parada

  • Neuroprotective effect of guanosine against glutamate-induced cell death in rat hippocampal slices is mediated by the phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase/Akt/ glycogen synthase kinase 3β pathway activation and inducible nitric oxide synthase inhibition.

    Simone Molz;Tharine Dal-Cim;Josiane Budni;M.D. Martín-de-Saavedra

  • Folic acid prevents depressive-like behavior and hippocampal antioxidant imbalance induced by restraint stress in mice

    Josiane Budni;Andréa Dias Zomkowski;Daiane Engel;Danúbia Bonfanti Santos

  • Minocycline reduces inflammatory parameters in the brain structures and serum and reverses memory impairment caused by the administration of amyloid β (1-42) in mice.

    Michelle Lima Garcez;Francielle Mina;Tatiani Bellettini-Santos;Franciellen Gonçalves Carneiro

  • Protective effects of ascorbic acid on behavior and oxidative status of restraint-stressed mice.

    Morgana Moretti;Josiane Budni;Danubia Bonfanti dos Santos;Alessandra Antunes

  • The Anti-Inflammatory Role of Minocycline in Alzheimer´s Disease.

    J. Budni;M. L. Garcez;J. De Medeiros;E. Cassaro

  • Guanosine produces an antidepressant-like effect through the modulation of NMDA receptors, nitric oxide–cGMP and PI3K/mTOR pathways

    Luis E.B. Bettio;Mauricio P. Cunha;Josiane Budni;Francis L. Pazini

  • Antidepressant-like action of the ethanolic extract from Tabebuia avellanedae in mice: evidence for the involvement of the monoaminergic system.

    Andiara E. Freitas;Josiane Budni;Kelly R. Lobato;Ricardo W. Binfaré

  • Omega-3 prevents behavior response and brain oxidative damage in the ketamine model of schizophrenia.

    A.I. Zugno;H.L. Chipindo;A.M. Volpato;J. Budni

  • Sodium butyrate functions as an antidepressant and improves cognition with enhanced neurotrophic expression in models of maternal deprivation and chronic mild stress.

    Samira Silva Valvassori;Roger Bitencourt Varela;Camila Orlandi Arent;Gustavo Colombo Dal-Pont

  • Contributions of animal models to the study of mood disorders

    Samira S. Valvassori;Josiane Budni;Roger B. Varela;Joao L De Quevedo

  • Inflammatory Cascade in Alzheimer's Disease Pathogenesis: A Review of Experimental Findings.

    Jade de Oliveira;Ewa Kucharska;Michelle Lima Garcez;Matheus Scarpatto Rodrigues

  • Antidepressant-like effect of ascorbic acid is associated with the modulation of mammalian target of rapamycin pathway

    Morgana Moretti;Josiane Budni;Andiara Espíndola Freitas;Priscila Batista Rosa

  • α-Tocopherol administration produces an antidepressant-like effect in predictive animal models of depression

    Kelly R. Lobato;Chandra C. Cardoso;Ricardo W. Binfaré;Josiane Budni

  • Fluoxetine modulates hippocampal cell signaling pathways implicated in neuroplasticity in olfactory bulbectomized mice.

    Andiara E. Freitas;Daniele G. Machado;Josiane Budni;Vivian B. Neis

  • Involvement of nitric oxide–cGMP pathway in the antidepressant-like effect of ascorbic acid in the tail suspension test

    Morgana Moretti;Andiara Espindola de Freitas;Josiane Budni;Sinara Castellen Pereira Fernandes

  • Antidepressant-like effect of folic acid: Involvement of NMDA receptors and l-arginine-nitric oxide-cyclic guanosine monophosphate pathway

    Patrícia de Souza Brocardo;Josiane Budni;Kelly Ribas Lobato;Manuella Pinto Kaster

Frequent Co-Authors

João Quevedo
João Quevedo The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Ana Lúcia S. Rodrigues
Ana Lúcia S. Rodrigues Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
Samira S. Valvassori
Samira S. Valvassori Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense
Adair R.S. Santos
Adair R.S. Santos Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
Tatiana Barichello
Tatiana Barichello The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Fabricia Petronilho
Fabricia Petronilho Sewanee: The University of the South
Gislaine Z. Réus
Gislaine Z. Réus Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense
Felipe Dal-Pizzol
Felipe Dal-Pizzol Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense
Flávio Kapczinski
Flávio Kapczinski McMaster University
Antonio Cuadrado
Antonio Cuadrado Autonomous University of Madrid

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Neuroscience opens doors to many related fields, especially with the flexibility of online learning. Many students consider accelerated online degrees to quickly enter the workforce or advance their education while balancing other responsibilities. These programs often let you graduate faster, saving both time and money.

When choosing your study path, it’s important to consider which fields offer strong earning potential. If you’re asking, what bachelors degree should I get to maximize my future income, research shows that some degrees lead to especially high-paying careers, particularly in science and technology.

For those seeking a solid return on their investment, exploring the easiest college majors with high pay can be a smart move. These majors can offer both a manageable learning experience and strong salary prospects after graduation.

Affordability is another key factor. Numerous online colleges that accept fafsa make it possible to minimize student debt while pursuing a neuroscience-related degree. This combination of flexibility, earning potential, and affordability helps students build rewarding careers.

Best Scientists Citing Josiane Budni

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles