World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
33
Citations
4895
World Ranking
7820
National Ranking
2615

James L. Hanula publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James L. Hanula sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 133 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

James L. Hanula D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James L. Hanula sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

James L. Hanula is affiliated with the US Forest Service in the United States and has contributed research primarily within the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Environmental Science. Their work spans several related subfields, including Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics; Nature and Landscape Conservation; Insect Science; Plant Science; and Genetics.

The scientific output of Hanula encompasses topics such as Plant and Animal Studies, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics, Plant Parasitism and Resistance, Insect and Pesticide Research, Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior, Fire Effects on Ecosystems, and Forest Insect Ecology and Management.

Hanula has been published in several academic venues, reflecting a focus on entomology and ecology-related studies. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Journal of Entomological Science
  • Forest Science
  • Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
  • Florida Entomologist

Recent research papers associated with Hanula, featuring various coauthors, include:

  • Effects of Chinese Privet on Bees and Their Vertical Distribution in Riparian Forests, 2020, Forest Science
  • Assessing the Efficiency of Pan Traps for Collecting Bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea), 2020, Journal of Entomological Science
  • Decadal Patterns of Forest and Pollinator Recovery Following the Eradication of an Invasive Shrub, 2022, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
  • Arthropod Abundance and Biomass in Response to Pinus taeda L. Trunk Height, 2020, Journal of Entomological Science
  • Argopistes tsekooni (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), a New Natural Enemy of Chinese Privet in North America: Identification, Establishment, and Host Range, 2025, Florida Entomologist

Frequent collaborators in Hanula's research projects include Scott Horn, Michael D. Ulyshen, Jacob R. Hudson, E. Richard Hoebeke, and Yanzhuo Zhang.

Best Publications

  • A Fungal Symbiont of the Redbay Ambrosia Beetle Causes a Lethal Wilt in Redbay and Other Lauraceae in the Southeastern United States

    S. W. Fraedrich;T. C. Harrington;R. J. Rabaglia;M. D. Ulyshen

  • Efficiency of Malaise traps and colored pan traps for collecting flower visiting insects from three forested ecosystems

    Joshua W. Campbell;Joshua W. Campbell;J. L. Hanula

  • Effects of prescribed fire and fire surrogates on floral visiting insects of the blue ridge province in North Carolina

    J.W. Campbell;J.L. Hanula;T.A. Waldrop

  • Conserving pollinators in North American forests: A review

    James L. Hanula;Michael D. Ulyshen;Scott Horn

  • Biology and host associations of redbay ambrosia beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae), exotic vector of laurel wilt killing redbay trees in the southeastern United States.

    James L. Hanula;Albert E. Mayfield;Stephen W. Fraedrich;Robert J. Rabaglia

  • On the vertical distribution of bees in a temperate deciduous forest

    Michael D. Ulyshen;Villu Soon;James L. Hanula

  • A Comparison of the Beetle (Coleoptera) Fauna Captured at Two Heights Above the Ground in a North American Temperate Deciduous Forest

    Michael D. Ulyshen;James L. Hanula

  • Have changing forests conditions contributed to pollinator decline in the southeastern United States

    James L. Hanula;Scott Horn;Joseph J. O’Brien

  • The Biology and Preliminary Host Range of Megacopta cribraria (Heteroptera: Plataspidae) and Its Impact on Kudzu Growth

    Yanzhuo Zhang;James L. Hanula;Scott Horn

  • Influence of long-term dormant-season burning and fire exclusion on ground-dwelling arthropod populations in longleaf pine flatwoods ecosystems

    James L Hanula;Dale D Wade

  • Manuka Oil and Phoebe Oil are Attractive Baits for Xyleborus glabratus (Coleoptera: Scolytinae), the Vector of Laurel Wilt

    James L. Hanula;Brian Sullivan

  • Chinese Privet (Ligustrum sinense) Removal and its Effect on Native Plant Communities of Riparian Forests

    James L. Hanula;Scott Horn;John W. Taylor

  • Habitat associations of saproxylic beetles in the southeastern United States: A comparison of forest types, tree species and wood postures.

    Michael D. Ulyshen;James L. Hanula

  • Source, distribution and abundance of macroarthropods on the bark of longleaf pine : potential prey of the red-cockaded woodpecker

    James L. Hanula;Kathleen Franzreb

  • Biology and Host Associations of Redbay Ambrosia Beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae), Exotic Vector of Laurel Wilt Killing Redbay Trees in the Southeastern United States

    Unknown

  • Identification and synthesis of female sex pheromone of Oriental beetle, Anomala orientalis (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae)

    Aijun Zhang;Henry T. Facundo;Paul S. Robbins;Charles E. Linn

  • Recovery plan for laurel wilt on redbay and other forest species caused by Raffaelea lauricola and disseminated by Xyleborus glabratus

    M. A. Hughes;J.A. Smith;R. C. Ploetz;P. E. Kendra

  • Removing an exotic shrub from riparian forests increases butterfly abundance and diversity

    James L. Hanula;Scott Horn

  • Removing an invasive shrub (Chinese privet) increases native bee diversity and abundance in riparian forests of the southeastern United States

    James L. Hanula;Scott Horn

  • Spatial and temporal patterns of beetles associated with coarse woody debris in managed bottomland hardwood forests.

    Michael D. Ulyshen;James L. Hanula;Scott Horn;John C. Kilgo

  • Association of wildfire with tree health and numbers of pine bark beetles, reproduction weevils and their associates in Florida

    James L. Hanula;James R. Meeker;Daniel R. Miller;Edward L. Barnard

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael D. Ulyshen
Michael D. Ulyshen US Forest Service
John C. Kilgo
John C. Kilgo US Forest Service
Christopher E. Moorman
Christopher E. Moorman North Carolina State University
Joseph J. O'Brien
Joseph J. O'Brien US Forest Service
Theodore G. Andreadis
Theodore G. Andreadis Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station
Mac A. Callaham
Mac A. Callaham US Forest Service
Paul F. Hendrix
Paul F. Hendrix University of Georgia
Thomas C. Harrington
Thomas C. Harrington Iowa State University
Lukasz L. Stelinski
Lukasz L. Stelinski University of Florida
Randy C. Ploetz
Randy C. Ploetz University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Ecology and Evolution often seek flexible education pathways and career opportunities in fields like nursing, healthcare, and science. Many choose to boost their credentials through online degrees that offer adaptability, accelerated programs, and cost-effective options.

Aspiring healthcare professionals can benefit from adn to np programs, which allow registered nurses to advance their education and qualify for nurse practitioner roles. For those without a nursing background, direct entry msn programs offer a direct route into advanced nursing practice.

Comparing institutions is also crucial for making informed decisions. Prospective students may explore differences between major online schools with guides like chamberlain vs capella rn to bsn program to choose the best fit based on program structure and support.

Those looking for affordability and career advancement options can consider bsn to msn programs online, which help registered nurses earn a Master’s in Nursing while continuing to work.

Best Scientists Citing James L. Hanula

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles