World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 41 7722 7204 4140 3761 78 12800

Brooke C. Feeney publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Brooke C. Feeney between 1964 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Brooke C. Feeney published across 62 years, from 1964 to 2025, averaging 1.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2015. 7 of the 93 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1964 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2015. 1964: 1 publication 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 6 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 4 publications
1964 2025

93 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Brooke C. Feeney: publications per year, 1964 to 2025
Year Publications
1964 1
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 1
1995 1
1996 1
1997 1
1998 1
1999 1
2000 2
2001 2
2002 0
2003 3
2004 6
2005 0
2006 3
2007 3
2008 3
2009 1
2010 6
2011 0
2012 4
2013 2
2014 4
2015 8
2016 4
2017 4
2018 5
2019 3
2020 3
2021 3
2022 6
2023 4
2024 3
2025 4
Total 93
Download as CSV

Brooke C. Feeney publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brooke C. Feeney sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 78 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461 78
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Brooke C. Feeney D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brooke C. Feeney sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 41
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Brooke C. Feeney is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States and specializes in psychology, with a focus on social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, sociology and political science, clinical psychology, and demography. Their research explores various aspects of human behavior, relationships, and aging.

The scholar's work primarily addresses topics such as attachment and relationship dynamics, evolutionary psychology and human behavior, family dynamics and relationships, intergenerational family dynamics and caregiving, family support in illness, aging and gerontology research, and human-animal interaction studies.

Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • Behavioral Sciences
  • Psychophysiology
  • Journal of Sleep Research

Some of the recent papers authored or coauthored by Brooke C. Feeney are:

  • "Individual and relational differences in desire for touch in romantic relationships," 2021, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
  • "Growing into retirement: Longitudinal evidence for the importance of partner support for self-expansion," 2020, Psychology and Aging
  • "Mechanisms Linking Attachment Orientation to Sleep Quality in Married Couples," 2022, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • "A narrative review of research linking non-sexual social touch to sleep quality," 2024, Journal of Sleep Research
  • "Affectionate Touch Promotes Shared Positive Activities," 2022, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

The researcher collaborates frequently with others in the field, including these coauthors:

  • Yuxi Xie
  • Jennifer M. Tomlinson
  • Joan K. Monin
  • Brett K. Jakubiak
  • Julian D. Fuentes

Brooke C. Feeney's body of work encompasses 40 publications primarily categorized under psychology with significant contributions to social psychology and related subfields. Their research emphasizes relational dynamics, caregiving roles, and aging processes, reflecting an interdisciplinary approach within social and clinical psychological contexts.

Best Publications

  • A safe haven: an attachment theory perspective on support seeking and caregiving in intimate relationships.

    Nancy L. Collins;Brooke C. Feeney

  • A New Look at Social Support: A Theoretical Perspective on Thriving Through Relationships

    Brooke C. Feeney;Nancy L. Collins

  • Working models of attachment shape perceptions of social support: evidence from experimental and observational studies.

    Nancy L. Collins;Brooke C. Feeney

  • Predictors of caregiving in adult intimate relationships: An attachment theoretical perspective.

    Brooke C. Feeney;Nancy L. Collins

  • A Secure Base: Responsive Support of Goal Strivings and Exploration in Adult Intimate Relationships.

    Brooke C. Feeney

  • This Paper is Embargoed until 29 August

    Brooke C. Feeney;Nancy L. Collins

  • Relationship Influences on Exploration in Adulthood: The Characteristics and Function of a Secure Base

    Brooke C. Feeney;Roxanne L. Thrush

  • Motivations for Caregiving in Adult Intimate Relationships: Influences on Caregiving Behavior and Relationship Functioning

    Brooke C. Feeney;Nancy L. Collins

  • Projection of responsiveness to needs and the construction of satisfying communal relationships.

    Edward P. Lemay Jr.;Margaret S. Clark;Brooke C. Feeney

  • Effects of adult attachment and presence of romantic partners on physiological responses to stress.

    Brooke C. Feeney;Lee A. Kirkpatrick

  • Working Models of Attachment: New Developments and Emerging Themes.

    Nancy L. Collins;Anamarie C. Guichard;Maire B. Ford;Brooke C. Feeney

  • The dependency paradox in close relationships: accepting dependence promotes independence.

    Brooke C. Feeney

  • Affectionate Touch to Promote Relational, Psychological, and Physical Well-Being in Adulthood A Theoretical Model and Review of the Research

    Brittany K. Jakubiak;Brooke C. Feeney

  • An Attachment Theory Perspective on Closeness and Intimacy

    Nancy L. Collins;Brooke C. Feeney

  • Responding to Need in Intimate Relationships: Normative Processes and Individual Differences.

    Nancy L. Collins;AnaMarie C. Guichard;Máire B. Ford;Brooke C. Feeney

  • Feeling supported and feeling satisfied: How one partner's attachment style predicts the other partner's relationship experiences

    Heidi S. Kane;Lisa M. Jaremka;AnaMarie C. Guichard;Máire B. Ford

  • Feedback Seeking in Children and Adolescents: Associations with Self-Perceptions, Attachment Representations, and Depression.

    Jude Cassidy;Yair Ziv;Tara G. Mehta;Brooke C. Feeney

  • Interpersonal Safe Haven and Secure Base Caregiving Processes in Adulthood.

    Brooke C. Feeney;Nancy L. Collins

  • The generalization of attachment representations to new social situations: predicting behavior during initial interactions with strangers.

    Brooke C. Feeney;Jude Cassidy;Fatima Ramos-Marcuse

  • Responding to need in intimate relationships: Social support and caregiving processes in couples.

    Nancy L. Collins;Máire B. Ford;AnaMarie C. Guichard;Heidi S. Kane

Frequent Co-Authors

Nancy L. Collins
Nancy L. Collins University of California, Santa Barbara
Lee A. Kirkpatrick
Lee A. Kirkpatrick William & Mary
Richard Schulz
Richard Schulz University of Pittsburgh
Jude Cassidy
Jude Cassidy University of Maryland, College Park
Edward P. Lemay
Edward P. Lemay University of Maryland, College Park
Kira S. Birditt
Kira S. Birditt University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Margaret S. Clark
Margaret S. Clark Yale University
John G. Holmes
John G. Holmes University of Waterloo
Sandra L. Murray
Sandra L. Murray University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Rebecca A. Ferrer
Rebecca A. Ferrer National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology studies often intersects with related fields, such as Social Work, which offers diverse online degree options and flexible career pathways. Many students consider pairing psychology knowledge with specialized social work credentials to work in clinical, educational, or community settings.

Prospective students can pursue respected programs like the top social work degrees in Utah, as well as the top social work programs in Virginia. These programs offer both academic rigor and career-focused training, preparing graduates for roles in counseling, case management, and social advocacy.

For those seeking further options, the top social work degrees in West Virginia provide accessible pathways to enter or advance in the helping professions. If you are considering advanced qualifications, exploring the easiest online social work doctorate programs in the US can help accelerate your professional growth and open doors to leadership or academic positions.

Choosing an online degree in Psychology or Social Work offers convenience and flexibility, allowing you to balance your studies with work or other commitments while preparing for impactful careers.

Best Scientists Citing Brooke C. Feeney

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles