World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
45
Citations
12458
World Ranking
6559
National Ranking
3560

Omri Gillath publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Omri Gillath sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 142 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Omri Gillath D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Omri Gillath sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Omri Gillath is affiliated with the University of Kansas in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the broad field of Psychology, with significant contributions in Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, and Applied Psychology.

Their work frequently focuses on topics related to Attachment and Relationship Dynamics, Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior, Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology, Cognitive Abilities and Testing, and Family Dynamics and Relationships.

Several recent papers highlight key areas of their research. These include:

  • Attachment and trust in artificial intelligence, 2020, published in Computers in Human Behavior
  • Attachment Security Priming: A Meta-Analysis, 2022, published in Personality and Social Psychology Review

Omri Gillath has collaborated frequently with co-authors such as R. Chris Fraley, Pascal R. Deboeck, Ting Ai, Gery C. Karantzas, and Keely A. Dugan. These partnerships have contributed to expanding knowledge in areas related to attachment theory, personality development, and social behavior.

Their work appears regularly in publication venues including the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, PsycTESTS Dataset, Journal of Personality, and Journal of Applied Social Psychology.

Some additional notable papers involving close collaborators include:

  • Do life events lead to enduring changes in adult attachment styles? A naturalistic longitudinal investigation., 2020, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • Life events sometimes alter the trajectory of personality development: Effect sizes for 25 life events estimated using a large, frequently assessed sample, 2023, Journal of Personality
  • Changes in global and relationship-specific attachment working models, 2022, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

Best Publications

  • Attachment, caregiving, and altruism: boosting attachment security increases compassion and helping.

    Mario Mikulincer;Phillip R. Shaver;Omri Gillath;Rachel A. Nitzberg

  • Activation of the attachment system in adulthood: Threat-related primes increase the accessibility of mental representations of attachment figures.

    Mario Mikulincer;Omri Gillath;Phillip R. Shaver

  • Attachment theory and reactions to others' needs:' evidence that activation of the sense of attachment security promotes empathic responses.

    Mario Mikulincer;Omri Gillath;Vered Halevy;Neta Avihou

  • The multidimensional driving style inventory—scale construct and validation

    Orit Taubman-Ben-Ari;Mario Mikulincer;Omri Gillath

  • When sex is more than just sex: attachment orientations, sexual experience, and relationship quality.

    Gurit E. Birnbaum;Harry T. Reis;Mario Mikulincer;Omri Gillath

  • Contemplative/emotion training reduces negative emotional behavior and promotes prosocial responses.

    Margaret E Kemeny;Carol Foltz;James F Cavanagh;Margaret Cullen

  • Attachment-style differences in the ability to suppress negative thoughts: exploring the neural correlates.

    Omri Gillath;Silvia A. Bunge;Phillip R. Shaver;Carter Wendelken

  • The affective component of the secure base schema: affective priming with representations of attachment security.

    Mario Mikulincer;Gilad Hirschberger;Orit Nachmias;Omri Gillath

  • Attachment and trust in artificial intelligence

    Omri Gillath;Ting Ai;Michael S. Branicky;Shawn Keshmiri

  • Attachment, authenticity, and honesty: dispositional and experimentally induced security can reduce self- and other-deception.

    Omri Gillath;Amanda K. Sesko;Phillip R. Shaver;David S. Chun

  • Attachment, caregiving, and volunteering: Placing volunteerism in an attachment‐theoretical framework

    Omri Gillath;a Phillip R. Shaver;a Mario Mikulincer;b Rachel E. Nitzberg

  • Development and validation of a state adult attachment measure (SAAM)

    Omri Gillath;Joshua Hart;Erik E. Noftle;Gary D. Stockdale

  • An attachment-theoretical approach to compassion and altruism

    Omri Gillath;Phillip R. Shaver;Mario Mikulincer

  • Attachment Theory and Concern for Others'Welfare: Evidence That Activation of the Sense of Secure Base Promotes Endorsement of Self-Transcendence Values

    Mario Mikulincer;Omri Gillath;Yael Sapir-Lavid;Erez Yaakobi

  • Genetic Correlates of Adult Attachment Style

    Omri Gillath;Phillip R. Shaver;Jong-Min Baek;David S. Chun

  • Adult Attachment: A Concise Introduction to Theory and Research

    Omri Gillath;Gery C. Karantzas;R. Chris Fraley

  • Avoiding Interference: Adult Attachment and Emotional Processing Biases

    Robin S. Edelstein;Omri Gillath

  • Moving Toward a Secure Attachment Style: Can Repeated Security Priming Help?

    Omri Gillath;Emre Selcuk;Phillip R. Shaver

  • Automatic Activation of Attachment-Related Goals:

    Omri Gillath;Mario Mikulincer;Grainne M. Fitzsimons;Phillip R. Shaver

  • What Can Virtual Reality Teach Us About Prosocial Tendencies in Real and Virtual Environments

    Omri Gillath;Cade McCall;Phillip R. Shaver;Jim Blascovich

Frequent Co-Authors

Phillip R. Shaver
Phillip R. Shaver University of California, Davis
Mario Mikulincer
Mario Mikulincer Reichman University
Gurit E. Birnbaum
Gurit E. Birnbaum Reichman University
R. Chris Fraley
R. Chris Fraley University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Fons J. R. van de Vijver
Fons J. R. van de Vijver Tilburg University
Christian S. Crandall
Christian S. Crandall University of Kansas
Mark J. Landau
Mark J. Landau University of Kansas
Jamie L. Goldenberg
Jamie L. Goldenberg University of South Florida
Ronald Fischer
Ronald Fischer Victoria University of Wellington
Michael S. Vitevitch
Michael S. Vitevitch University of Kansas

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA opens up diverse professional opportunities, especially when paired with related online degrees. Students interested in understanding human behavior can also benefit from studying Sociology, which offers complementary insights. To compare fields, see sociology vs psychology for a detailed explanation.

Careers in mental health, counseling, research, and education are popular pathways for psychology graduates. If you're curious about broader options, learn more about what to do with a psychology degree, including roles in HR, social work, and business. Many professionals also explore jobs for sociologists, which can range from research analysis to community services and beyond.

Taking social science courses in college can further enhance your critical thinking, research, and communication skills, benefiting any social science career. As demand grows for online education, these degrees offer flexibility and relevance for today’s job market.

Best Scientists Citing Omri Gillath

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles