What is she best known for?
The fields of study she is best known for:
- Law
- Developmental psychology
- Social psychology
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Developmental psychology, Spanking, Child rearing, Corporal punishment and Child abuse.
Her research on Developmental psychology focuses in particular on Parenting styles.
Her research on Spanking frequently connects to adjacent areas such as Child discipline.
Her work is dedicated to discovering how Corporal punishment, Punishment are connected with Religious differences and Protestantism and other disciplines.
Her Child abuse study results in a more complete grasp of Suicide prevention.
Her Clinical psychology research includes elements of Cognitive skill, Family income and Early childhood.
Her most cited work include:
- Corporal punishment by parents and associated child behaviors and experiences: A meta-analytic and theoretical review. (1526 citations)
- Income is not enough: incorporating material hardship into models of income associations with parenting and child development. (582 citations)
- Mothers' emotional expressivity and children's behavior problems and social competence: mediation through children's regulation. (364 citations)
What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?
Her primary scientific interests are in Developmental psychology, Corporal punishment, Spanking, Criminology and Social psychology.
Many of her studies on Developmental psychology involve topics that are commonly interrelated, such as Clinical psychology.
Her Corporal punishment research includes themes of Punishment, Government, Physical punishment and School discipline.
The Spanking study which covers Child abuse that intersects with Child discipline.
Her biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Law, Human rights and Social exclusion.
Her research in Early childhood focuses on subjects like Child development, which are connected to Cognitive development.
She most often published in these fields:
- Developmental psychology (43.20%)
- Corporal punishment (20.80%)
- Spanking (20.00%)
What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2018-2021)?
- Foster care (8.80%)
- Developmental psychology (43.20%)
- Public relations (3.20%)
In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:
Her scientific interests lie mostly in Foster care, Developmental psychology, Public relations, Best interests and Physical punishment.
Elizabeth T. Gershoff has included themes like Neglect and State in her Foster care study.
Her Developmental psychology study which covers Psychological resilience that intersects with Structural equation modeling.
The concepts of her Public relations study are interwoven with issues in Empirical evidence, Subjectivity and Intervention.
Elizabeth T. Gershoff studied Best interests and Impact evaluation that intersect with Referral, Program evaluation and Logic model.
Elizabeth T. Gershoff interconnects PsycINFO, Criminology and Cognitive development in the investigation of issues within Physical punishment.
Between 2018 and 2021, her most popular works were:
- Thresholds of Resilience and Within- and Cross-Domain Academic Achievement among Children in Poverty. (10 citations)
- What Do Parents Want From Preschool? Perspectives of Low-Income Latino/a Immigrant Families. (5 citations)
- Foster Care and Best Interests of the Child: Integrating Research, Policy, and Practice (3 citations)
In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Law
- Developmental psychology
- Social psychology
Elizabeth T. Gershoff spends much of her time researching Developmental psychology, Academic achievement, Public relations, Best interests and Foster care.
She specializes in Developmental psychology, namely Developmentally Appropriate Practice.
Her work deals with themes such as Mental health, Propensity score matching, School discipline and Corporal punishment, which intersect with Academic achievement.
Elizabeth T. Gershoff integrates Public relations and Research policy in her research.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
