World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 72 2024 1835 1178 1043 208 27184

Robert Crosnoe publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Robert Crosnoe between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Robert Crosnoe published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 6.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2011. 7 of the 243 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2011. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 22 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 5 publications
1991 2025

243 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Robert Crosnoe: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 1
2000 3
2001 3
2002 10
2003 2
2004 12
2005 4
2006 6
2007 8
2008 12
2009 6
2010 12
2011 22
2012 12
2013 3
2014 9
2015 15
2016 19
2017 12
2018 17
2019 12
2020 11
2021 9
2022 9
2023 6
2024 2
2025 5
Total 243
Download as CSV

Robert Crosnoe publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Crosnoe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–210 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 208 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328 208
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Robert Crosnoe D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Crosnoe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183 72
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Robert Crosnoe is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research primarily spans the social sciences, with a particular focus on education, sociology, psychology, and demography. Crosnoe's work addresses various subfields including education, sociology and political science, experimental and cognitive psychology, safety research, and demography.

Their scholarly output encompasses numerous topics, notably early childhood education and development, family dynamics and relationships, youth development and social support, education achievement and giftedness, grit, self-efficacy and motivation, health disparities and outcomes, as well as gender, labor, and family dynamics.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Crosnoe include:

  • "Maternal education and early childhood education across affluent English-speaking countries," 2021, International Journal of Behavioral Development
  • "Teacher Mindsets Help Explain Where a Growth-Mindset Intervention Does and Doesn't Work," 2021, Psychological Science
  • "How can we inspire nations of learners? An investigation of growth mindset and challenge-seeking in two countries," 2020, American Psychologist
  • "Genetic associations with mathematics tracking and persistence in secondary school," 2020, npj Science of Learning
  • "School-based extracurricular activity involvement and high school dropout among at-risk students: Consistency matters," 2020, Applied Developmental Science

Frequent coauthors working alongside Crosnoe include:

  • David S. Yeager
  • Shannon Cavanagh
  • Jenny Buontempo
  • Chandra Muller
  • Tama Leventhal

Crosnoe's work is regularly published in venues such as:

  • Journal of Research on Adolescence
  • Journal of Health and Social Behavior
  • Demography
  • UNC Libraries
  • Psychological Science

The academic also has contributions in book publications, including:

  • The Starting Line, published by University of Texas Press in 2020
  • The Journey into Adulthood in Uncertain Times, forthcoming from Russell Sage Foundation in 2025

Best Publications

  • The Emergence and Development of Life Course Theory

    Glen H. Elder;Monica Kirkpatrick Johnson;Robert Crosnoe

  • Social Relationships and Health Behavior Across the Life Course

    Debra J Umberson;Robert Crosnoe;Corinne Reczek

  • A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement.

    David S. Yeager;Paul Hanselman;Gregory M. Walton;Jared S. Murray

  • Intergenerational Bonding in School: The Behavioral and Contextual Correlates of Student-Teacher Relationships.

    Robert Crosnoe;Monica Kirkpatrick Johnson;Glen H. Elder

  • Identifying risk for obesity in early childhood.

    Philip R. Nader;Philip R. Nader;Marion O'Brien;Renate Houts;Robert Bradley

  • Students' Attachment and Academic Engagement: The Role of Race and Ethnicity.

    Monica Kirkpatrick Johnson;Robert Crosnoe;Glen H. Elder

  • Social Capital and the Interplay of Families and Schools

    Robert Crosnoe

  • Friendships in Childhood and Adolescence: The Life Course and New Directions*

    Robert Crosnoe

  • Protective Functions of Family Relationships and School Factors on the Deviant Behavior of Adolescent Boys and Girls: Reducing the Impact of Risky Friendships.

    Robert Crosnoe;Kristan Glasgow Erickson;Sanford M. Dornbusch

  • Family Dynamics, Supportive Relationships, and Educational Resilience During Adolescence

    Robert Crosnoe;Glen H. Elder

  • Examining the Black–White Achievement Gap Among Low-Income Children Using the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development

    Margaret Burchinal;Kathleen McCartney;Laurence Steinberg;Robert Crosnoe

  • Low-Income Students and the Socioeconomic Composition of Public High Schools.

    Robert Crosnoe

  • School Size and the Interpersonal Side of Education: An Examination of Race/Ethnicity and Organizational Context*

    Robert Crosnoe;Monica Kirkpatrick Johnson;Glen H. Elder

  • ADOLESCENT FRIENDSHIPS AS ACADEMIC RESOURCES: THE INTERSECTION OF FRIENDSHIP, RACE, AND SCHOOL DISADVANTAGE

    Robert Crosnoe;Shannon Cavanagh;Glen H. Elder

  • K-12 Educational Outcomes of Immigrant Youth

    Robert Crosnoe;Ruth N. López Turley

  • Family Socioeconomic Status and Consistent Environmental Stimulation in Early Childhood

    Robert Crosnoe;Tama Leventhal;R. J. Wirth;Kim M. Pierce

  • Research on Adolescence in the Twenty-First Century

    Robert Crosnoe;Monica Kirkpatrick Johnson

  • Insights on Adolescence from A Life Course Perspective.

    Monica Kirkpatrick Johnson;Robert Crosnoe;Glen H. Elder

  • Fitting In, Standing Out: Navigating the Social Challenges of High School to Get an Education

    Robert Crosnoe

  • Economic disadvantage, family dynamics, and adolescent enrollment in higher education.

    Robert Crosnoe;Rashmita S. Mistry;Glen H. Elder

  • Double Disadvantage or Signs of Resilience? The Elementary School Contexts of Children From Mexican Immigrant Families

    Robert Crosnoe

Frequent Co-Authors

Arya Ansari
Arya Ansari The Ohio State University
Chandra Muller
Chandra Muller The University of Texas at Austin
Aprile D. Benner
Aprile D. Benner The University of Texas at Austin
Glen H. Elder
Glen H. Elder University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Tama Leventhal
Tama Leventhal Tufts University
Monica Kirkpatrick Johnson
Monica Kirkpatrick Johnson Washington State University
Kenneth A. Frank
Kenneth A. Frank Michigan State University
Barbara Schneider
Barbara Schneider Michigan State University
Jay Belsky
Jay Belsky University of California, Davis
Renate Houts
Renate Houts Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens diverse opportunities for online degrees and professional pathways. Many students pursue specializations like Marriage and Family Therapy (MFT), which are in high demand across the country. Understanding the specific licensure and educational requirements is essential for aspiring therapists, and these requirements can vary significantly by location.

For example, those interested in working as an MFT in Texas can review the mft requirements in Dallas to learn about state education standards and licensure processes. If you're considering Colorado, read more about the Denver mft education requirements to understand the unique aspects of practice in that region.

Aspiring professionals in Michigan can find detailed guidance on how to become a marriage and family therapist in Detroit. Similarly, those focusing on North Carolina should explore the Durham mft certification requirements for up-to-date information on certification routes.

Exploring these pathways and requirements can help you make informed decisions about your career and choose the right accredited program to achieve your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Robert Crosnoe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles