World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
6334
World Ranking
10209
National Ranking
511

Christof Ebert publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christof Ebert sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 216 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Christof Ebert D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christof Ebert sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Christof Ebert is affiliated with the University of Stuttgart in Germany. Their research work primarily focuses on computer science, with a substantial concentration in software engineering and related fields.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Computer Science

Subfields of study encompass:

  • Information Systems
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Software
  • Management Information Systems

Key research topics covered by Christof Ebert include:

  • Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
  • Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
  • Big Data and Business Intelligence
  • Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Digitalization, Law, and Regulation

Frequent publication venues for Christof Ebert's work are:

  • IEEE Software
  • Computer
  • ATZelectronics worldwide
  • ATZelektronik
  • SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series

Selected recent papers authored by Christof Ebert include:

  • "Generative AI for Software Practitioners," 2023, IEEE Software
  • "Green IT and Green Software," 2021, IEEE Software
  • "Digital Transformation - A Primer for Practitioners," 2020, IEEE Software
  • "Quantum Computing," 2021, IEEE Software
  • "Collaboration Tools for Developers," 2022, IEEE Software

Christof Ebert has collaborated frequently with several co-authors including:

  • İpek Özkaya
  • Michael Weyrich
  • Aurora Vizcaíno
  • Jeffrey C. Carver
  • Miroslaw Staron

In addition to articles, Christof Ebert has contributed to book publications. One documented book is titled Verteiltes Arbeiten kompakt, published by IT kompakt in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Reference Architectures for the Internet of Things

    Unknown

  • Surviving Global Software Development

    Unknown

  • DevOps

    Unknown

  • Collaboration Tools for Global Software Engineering

    F. Lanubile;C. Ebert;R. Prikladnicki;A. Vizcaino

  • Machine Learning

    Unknown

  • Scaling Agile

    Christof Ebert;Maria Paasivaara

  • Requirements engineering tools: Capabilities, survey and assessment

    Juan M. Carrillo De Gea;JoaquíN NicoláS;José L. FernáNdez AlemáN;Ambrosio Toval

  • Cyclomatic Complexity

    Unknown

  • Collaborative Software Development Platforms for Crowdsourcing

    Xin Peng;Muhammad Ali Babar;Christof Ebert

  • Requirements Engineering Tools

    J. M. Carrillo de Gea;J. Nicolas;J. L. F. Aleman;A. Toval

  • Microservices

    Unknown

  • Software measurement - establish, extract, evaluate, execute

    Unknown

  • Machine-to-Machine Communication

    Unknown

  • Lean Software Development

    Christof Ebert;Pekka Abrahamsson;Nilay Oza

  • The Top Risks of Requirements Engineering

    Unknown

  • Green IT and Green Software

    Roberto Verdecchia;Patricia Lago;Christof Ebert;Carol de Vries

  • Requirements Engineering for the Digital Transformation: Industry Panel

    Unknown

  • Software Measurement: Establish - Extract - Evaluate - Execute

    Unknown

  • Software product management - An industry evaluation

    Christof Ebert;Sjaak Brinkkemper

  • Classification techniques for metric-based software development

    Unknown

  • Tools to Support Global Software Development Processes: A Survey

    Javier Portillo-Rodriguez;Aurora Vizcaino;Christof Ebert;Mario Piattini

  • Software Verification and Validation Technologies and Tools

    Moises Rodriguez;Mario Piattini;Christof Ebert

  • Digital Transformation?A Primer for Practitioners

    Georgios Doukidis;Diomidis Spinellis;Christof Ebert

  • Group Awareness in Global Software Engineering

    F. Lanubile;F. Calefato;C. Ebert

  • Rule-based fuzzy classification for software quality control

    Christof Ebert

  • Validation of Autonomous Systems

    Christof Ebert;Michael Weyrich

  • Guest editors' introduction: RE'03: practical requirements engineering solutions

    R. Wieringa;C. Ebert

  • Test Automation

    M. Polo;P. Reales;M. Piattini;C. Ebert

  • Enterprise Architecture

    Ricardo Perez-Castillo;Francisco Ruiz;Mario Piattini;Christof Ebert

  • Process Management Tools

    F Garcia;A Vizcaino;C Ebert

  • Requirements Engineering Tools: An Evaluation

    Juan M. Carrillo de Gea;Christof Ebert;Mohamed Hosni;Aurora Vizcaino

  • Reengineering Technologies

    R. Perez-Castillo;I. G-R de Guzman;M. Piattini;C. Ebert

  • Technologies to Support Collaboration across Time Zones

    R. Prikladnicki;S. Marczak;E. Carmel;C. Ebert

  • Data Science: Technologies for Better Software

    Christof Ebert;Jens Heidrich;Silverio Martinez-Fernandez;Adam Trendowicz

  • Measurement of Software Size: Advances Made by the COSMIC Community

    Charles Symons;Alain Abran;Christof Ebert;Frank Vogelezang

Frequent Co-Authors

Mario Piattini
Mario Piattini University of Castilla-La Mancha
Paula Fraga-Lamas
Paula Fraga-Lamas University of A Coruña
Diomidis Spinellis
Diomidis Spinellis Athens University of Economics and Business
Tiago M. Fernández-Caramés
Tiago M. Fernández-Caramés University of A Coruña
Rafael Prikladnicki
Rafael Prikladnicki Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science can lead to many rewarding and flexible career options. With the rise of virtual learning, students now have easier access to accredited programs tailored to different goals and budgets. For those looking to get started without breaking the bank, you can find affordable online bachelor degree programs that offer a solid foundation in tech fields.

Engineering is another popular route closely connected to computer science. If you’re interested in broadening your tech expertise, an online bachelor's in engineering can open doors to cutting-edge careers in fields such as software development, networking, and artificial intelligence.

For those aiming for leadership positions or management roles within the tech industry, there are flexible executive education options like the executive online MBA. This pathway combines business skills with technological know-how—helping professionals move up the career ladder.

Alternatively, tech-minded individuals interested in data, research, and information systems might consider a master’s in library science. By exploring the cheapest mlis degree online, you can build skills in managing digital information—a role increasingly valued in today’s data-driven world.

Best Scientists Citing Christof Ebert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles