World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
35
Citations
4262
World Ranking
11814
National Ranking
4824

Edward B. Allen publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward B. Allen sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 95 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Edward B. Allen D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward B. Allen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Edward B. Allen is affiliated with Mississippi State University in the United States. Their research spans several interconnected fields within biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a specific focus on genetics. The scientist's work intersects diverse subfields including archaeology, oral surgery, urology, and history.

Their research topics explore areas such as forensic and genetic research, the relationship between race, genetics, and society, forensic anthropology and bioarchaeology studies, dental implant techniques and outcomes, cleft lip and palate research, periodontal regeneration and treatments, and travel writing and literature.

Edward B. Allen has contributed to several peer-reviewed publications in a variety of academic venues. Recent papers include:

  • "Identifying Human Remains from 20th Century Warfare: A State of the Field Essay" (2022), published in Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark
  • "Augmentation of Interdental Papilla at Implant/Tooth Sites with the Tunneling Technique and a Pedicle Graft: Technique and Case Report" (2022), published in The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry
  • "If Not Critical. By Eric Griffiths. Edited by Freya Johnston" (2021), published in Essays in Criticism
  • "Cover Image" (2022), published in International Journal of Osteoarchaeology

Throughout their research career, Edward B. Allen has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Shaoqing Wen, Yiran Xu, Lingxiang Wang, Norbert M. Salenbauch, and Jianxue Xiong.

Best Publications

  • Application of neural networks to software quality modeling of a very large telecommunications system

    T.M. Khoshgoftaar;E.B. Allen;J.P. Hudepohl;S.J. Aud

  • Early quality prediction: a case study in telecommunications

    T.M. Khoshgoftaar;E.B. Allen;K.S. Kalaichelvan;N. Goel

  • Classification-tree models of software-quality over multiple releases

    T.M. Khoshgoftaar;E.B. Allen;W.D. Jones;J.P. Hudepohl

  • EMERALD: software metrics and models on the desktop

    J.P. Hudepohl;S.J. Aud;T.M. Khoshgoftaar;E.B. Allen

  • Using regression trees to classify fault-prone software modules

    T.M. Khoshgoftaar;E.B. Allen;Jianyu Deng

  • An application of fuzzy clustering to software quality prediction

    X. Yuan;T.M. Khoshgoftaar;E.B. Allen;K. Ganesan

  • Measuring coupling and cohesion of software modules: an information-theory approach

    E.B. Allen;T.M. Khoshgoftaar;Y. Chen

  • LOGISTIC REGRESSION MODELING OF SOFTWARE QUALITY

    Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar;Edward B. Allen

  • Detection of software modules with high debug code churn in a very large legacy system

    T.M. Khoshgoftaar;E.B. Allen;N. Goel;A. Nandi

  • CASE-BASED SOFTWARE QUALITY PREDICTION

    K. Ganesan;Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar;Edward B. Allen

  • Measuring coupling and cohesion: an information-theory approach

    E.B. Allen;T.M. Khoshgoftaar

  • Classification of Fault-Prone Software Modules: Prior Probabilities,Costs, and Model Evaluation

    Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar;Edward B. Allen

  • Balancing Misclassification Rates in Classification-TreeModels of Software Quality

    Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar;Xiaojing Yuan;Edward B. Allen

  • Predicting fault-prone modules with case-based reasoning

    Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar;K. Ganesan;Edward B. Allen;Fletcher D. Ross

  • GP-based software quality prediction

    Matthew Evett;Taghi Khoshgoftar;Pei-der Chien;Edward Allen

  • Ordering Fault-Prone Software Modules

    Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar;Edward B. Allen

  • Predicting testability of program modules using a neural network

    T.M. Khoshgoftaar;E.B. Allen;Z. Xu

  • Using process history to predict software quality

    T.M. Khoshgoftaar;E.B. Allen;R. Halstead;G.P. Trio

  • A practical classification-rule for software-quality models

    T.M. Khoshgoftaar;E.B. Allen

  • DATA MINING FOR PREDICTORS OF SOFTWARE QUALITY

    Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar;Edward B. Allen;Wendell D. Jones;John P. Hudepohl

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey C. Carver
Jeffrey C. Carver University of Alabama
Nan Niu
Nan Niu University of North Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA can open doors to a variety of online degree options and related career fields. Many students now prefer flexible programs, such as a fast track computer science degree, which allows you to earn your credentials in less time and enter the workforce sooner.

If your interests span beyond computer science, you may also consider programs in environmental or engineering fields. An affordable path in this area is the cheapest online environmental science degree, ideal for those aiming for sustainability and environmental careers.

Engineering remains a popular career path, with options like an online degree for mechanical engineering preparing students for roles in product design, manufacturing, and more.

For those fascinated by the fundamentals of science and technology, an online bachelor's degree in physics can lead to opportunities in research, teaching, or further studies.

Each of these online degrees helps build a strong foundation for diverse and rewarding STEM careers.

Best Scientists Citing Edward B. Allen

Recently Published Articles