World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
54
Citations
16247
World Ranking
4469
National Ranking
2090

Elaine J. Weyuker publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elaine J. Weyuker sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 185 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Elaine J. Weyuker D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elaine J. Weyuker sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2010 - ACM Presidential Award In honor of her tireless efforts in the development and growth of ACM-W. Dr. Weyuker took over as Chair of ACM-W at a critical point in its survival. Under her expert guidance, she built a network of enthusiastic volunteers to help propel ACM-W forward, in the process creating many new ideas for activities, awards, and scholarships to cultivate and celebrate women seeking careers in computing. Over the last two years, as first Chair of the new ACM-W Council, she has reshaped ACM-W from a grassroots network to a professional community within ACM that contributes to strategic discussions at the highest levels of the organization.
  • 2002 - Member of the National Academy of Engineering For contributions to software testing, reliability, and measurement, and for the development of mathematical foundations for software testing.
  • 1997 - ACM Fellow For contributions to software engineering, specifically software testing and metrics, and the theory of computation.

Overview

Elaine J. Weyuker is affiliated with the University of Central Florida in the United States. Their research spans main fields of Computer Science and Mathematics, with particular focus on subfields including Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research, Software, Computational Theory and Mathematics, and Theoretical Computer Science.

Their work covers various research topics, prominently including Data Quality and Management, Software Engineering Research, Software Reliability and Analysis Research, Software Engineering Techniques and Practices, Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms, History and Theory of Mathematics, and Analytic Number Theory Research.

Elaine J. Weyuker's recent publications include the following papers:

  • Impact of "An Applicable Family of Data Flow Testing Criteria", 2025, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
  • Impact of "Evaluating Software Complexity Measures", 2025, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
  • Martin Davis: An Overview of his Work in Logic, Computer Science, and Philosophy, 2025, Philosophia Mathematica

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Elaine J. Weyuker include:

  • Liesbeth De Mol
  • Yuri V Matiyasevich
  • Eugenio G. Omodeo
  • Alberto Policriti
  • Wilfried Sieg

The primary publication venues where Elaine J. Weyuker has contributed are:

  • IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
  • Philosophia Mathematica

Elaine J. Weyuker has received several awards recognizing contributions to software engineering and related fields. These include the ACM Presidential Award in 2010, awarded for efforts in development and growth of ACM-W, the Member of the National Academy of Engineering designation in 2002 for contributions to software testing, reliability, and measurement, and the ACM Fellow distinction in 1997 for contributions to software engineering, specifically software testing and metrics, and the theory of computation.

Best Publications

  • Selecting Software Test Data Using Data Flow Information

    S. Rapps;E.J. Weyuker

  • Evaluating Software Complexity Measures

    E.J. Weyuker

  • Predicting the location and number of faults in large software systems

    T.J. Ostrand;E.J. Weyuker;R.M. Bell

  • Computability, Complexity, and Languages: Fundamentals of Theoretical Computer Science

    Martin D. Davis;Ron Sigal;Elaine J. Weyuker

  • On Testing Non-Testable Programs

    Elaine J. Weyuker

  • An applicable family of data flow testing criteria

    P.G. Frankl;E.J. Weyuker

  • Analyzing partition testing strategies

    E.J. Weyuker;B. Jeng

  • Testing component-based software: a cautionary tale

    E.J. Weyuker

  • Experience with performance testing of software systems: issues, an approach, and case study

    E.J. Weyuker;F.I. Vokolos

  • Where the bugs are

    Thomas J. Ostrand;Elaine J. Weyuker;Robert M. Bell

  • The distribution of faults in a large industrial software system

    Thomas J. Ostrand;Elaine J. Weyuker

  • Automatically generating test data from a Boolean specification

    E. Weyuker;T. Goradia;A. Singh

  • Theories of Program Testing and the Application of Revealing Subdomains

    E.J. Weyuker;T.J. Ostrand

  • Data flow analysis techniques for test data selection

    Sandra Rapps;Elaine J. Weyuker

  • A formal analysis of the fault-detecting ability of testing methods

    P.G. Frankl;E.J. Weyuker

  • Axiomatizing software test data adequacy

    E. J. Weyuker

  • Computability, complexity, and languages

    Martin Davies;Ron Segal;Elaine Weyuker

  • Monitoring Smoothly Degrading Systems for Increased Dependability

    Alberto Avritzer;Elaine J. Weyuker

  • Do too many cooks spoil the broth? Using the number of developers to enhance defect prediction models

    Elaine J. Weyuker;Thomas J. Ostrand;Robert M. Bell

  • The evaluation of program-based software test data adequacy criteria

    E. J. Weyuker

Frequent Co-Authors

David S. Rosenblum
David S. Rosenblum George Mason University
Murray Woodside
Murray Woodside Carleton University
Sandro Morasca
Sandro Morasca University of Insubria
Lionel C. Briand
Lionel C. Briand University of Ottawa
Victor R. Basili
Victor R. Basili University of Maryland, College Park
Barbara Kitchenham
Barbara Kitchenham Keele University
Marvin V. Zelkowitz
Marvin V. Zelkowitz University of Maryland, College Park
Shari Lawrence Pfleeger
Shari Lawrence Pfleeger Dartmouth College
Mary Jane Irwin
Mary Jane Irwin Pennsylvania State University
Kin K. Leung
Kin K. Leung Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degrees and dynamic career options. Many students continue their studies with flexible programs that support both personal and professional growth.

For those seeking strong management skills, the cheapest mba online programs can provide a valuable business edge, often at a lower cost than traditional degrees. Similarly, fast-track options like a 1 year masters program let you build advanced expertise and re-enter the workforce quickly.

If your goal is to maximize earning potential with minimal time investment, you’ll find many easy degrees that pay well. These options can help kick-start rewarding careers in tech and other high-demand fields. With artificial intelligence reshaping industries, pursuing the best online ai degrees can lead to cutting-edge roles and innovative opportunities.

Together, these degrees create flexible pathways for ambitious students to tailor their education and career within the evolving world of technology.

Best Scientists Citing Elaine J. Weyuker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles