World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Tiago M. Fernández-Caramés

Tiago M. Fernández-Caramés

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 42 8299 8063 116 114 110 8657

Tiago M. Fernández-Caramés publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tiago M. Fernández-Caramés between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tiago M. Fernández-Caramés published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 6.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2024. 31 of the 135 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2024. 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 4 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 1 publication 2011: 3 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 20 publications 2025: 11 publications
2006 2025

135 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tiago M. Fernández-Caramés: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 1
2007 1
2008 4
2009 1
2010 1
2011 3
2012 4
2013 2
2014 0
2015 2
2016 4
2017 12
2018 16
2019 13
2020 18
2021 8
2022 6
2023 8
2024 20
2025 11
Total 135
Download as CSV

Tiago M. Fernández-Caramés publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tiago M. Fernández-Caramés sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 102–111 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 110 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420 110
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Tiago M. Fernández-Caramés D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tiago M. Fernández-Caramés sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821 42
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Tiago M. Fernández-Caramés is affiliated with the University of A Coruña in Spain. Their research primarily spans the fields of Computer Science and Engineering, with a focus on subfields such as Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Human-Computer Interaction, and Electrical and Electronic Engineering.

Their contributions cover a range of topics related to IoT and Edge/Fog Computing, Blockchain Technology Applications and Security, Augmented Reality Applications, Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts, Digital Transformation in Industry, Bluetooth and Wireless Communication Technologies, and IoT Networks and Protocols.

Among their recent papers are:

  • Towards Post-Quantum Blockchain: A Review on Blockchain Cryptography Resistant to Quantum Computing Attacks (2020, IEEE Access)
  • Green IoT and Edge AI as Key Technological Enablers for a Sustainable Digital Transition towards a Smart Circular Economy: An Industry 5.0 Use Case (2021, Sensors)
  • Next Generation Auto-Identification and Traceability Technologies for Industry 5.0: A Methodology and Practical Use Case for the Shipbuilding Industry (2021, IEEE Access)
  • Design, Implementation, and Empirical Validation of an IoT Smart Irrigation System for Fog Computing Applications Based on LoRa and LoRaWAN Sensor Nodes (2020, Sensors)
  • Creating Collaborative Augmented Reality Experiences for Industry 4.0 Training and Assistance Applications: Performance Evaluation in the Shipyard of the Future (2020, Applied Sciences)

Frequent publication venues for Fernández-Caramés include:

  • IEEE Access
  • Sensors
  • Applied Sciences
  • Kalpa publications in computing
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

They have collaborated extensively with multiple co-authors, notably Paula Fraga-Lamas, Iván Froiz-Míguez, Óscar Blanco-Novoa, Sérgio Ivan Lopes, and Aida Vidal-Balea.

In addition to journal articles, Fernández-Caramés has contributed to book publications, including a title published by IntechOpen titled "Blockchain Potential in AI" (2021).

Best Publications

  • A Review on the Use of Blockchain for the Internet of Things

    Tiago M. Fernandez-Carames;Paula Fraga-Lamas

  • Towards Post-Quantum Blockchain: A Review on Blockchain Cryptography Resistant to Quantum Computing Attacks

    Tiago M. Fernandez-Carames;Paula Fraga-Lamas

  • A Review on Industrial Augmented Reality Systems for the Industry 4.0 Shipyard

    Paula Fraga-Lamas;Tiago M. Fernandez-Carames;Oscar Blanco-Novoa;Miguel A. Vilar-Montesinos

  • A Review on Blockchain Technologies for an Advanced and Cyber-Resilient Automotive Industry

    Paula Fraga-Lamas;Tiago M. Fernandez-Carames

  • Green IoT and Edge AI as Key Technological Enablers for a Sustainable Digital Transition towards a Smart Circular Economy: An Industry 5.0 Use Case

    Paula Fraga-Lamas;Sérgio Ivan Lopes;Tiago M. Fernández-Caramés

  • Towards The Internet of Smart Clothing: A Review on IoT Wearables and Garments for Creating Intelligent Connected E-Textiles

    Tiago M. Fernández-Caramés;Paula Fraga-Lamas

  • A Review on the Application of Blockchain to the Next Generation of Cybersecure Industry 4.0 Smart Factories

    Tiago M. Fernández-Caramés;Paula Fraga-Lamas

  • Towards an Autonomous Industry 4.0 Warehouse: A UAV and Blockchain-Based System for Inventory and Traceability Applications in Big Data-Driven Supply Chain Management.

    Tiago M Fernández-Caramés;Oscar Blanco-Novoa;Iván Froiz-Míguez;Paula Fraga-Lamas

  • Towards the Internet of Smart Trains: A Review on Industrial IoT-Connected Railways

    Paula Fraga-Lamas;Tiago M. Fernández-Caramés;Luis Castedo

  • A Review on Internet of Things for Defense and Public Safety.

    Paula Fraga-Lamas;Tiago M. Fernández-Caramés;Manuel Suárez-Albela;Luis Castedo

  • From Pre-Quantum to Post-Quantum IoT Security: A Survey on Quantum-Resistant Cryptosystems for the Internet of Things

    Tiago M. Fernandez-Carames

  • Design, Implementation and Practical Evaluation of an IoT Home Automation System for Fog Computing Applications Based on MQTT and ZigBee-WiFi Sensor Nodes.

    Iván Froiz-Míguez;Tiago M. Fernández-Caramés;Paula Fraga-Lamas;Luis Castedo

  • A Practical Evaluation of Commercial Industrial Augmented Reality Systems in an Industry 4.0 Shipyard

    Oscar Blanco-Novoa;Tiago M. Fernandez-Carames;Paula Fraga-Lamas;Miguel A. Vilar-Montesinos

  • A Review on Human-Centered IoT-Connected Smart Labels for the Industry 4.0

    Tiago M. Fernandez-Carames;Paula Fraga-Lamas

  • Real-time personal protective equipment monitoring system

    Santiago Barro-Torres;Tiago M. FernáNdez-CaraméS;HéCtor J. PéRez-Iglesias;Carlos J. Escudero

  • Towards Next Generation Teaching, Learning, and Context-Aware Applications for Higher Education: A Review on Blockchain, IoT, Fog and Edge Computing Enabled Smart Campuses and Universities

    Tiago M. Fernández-Caramés;Paula Fraga-Lamas

  • A Fog Computing and Cloudlet Based Augmented Reality System for the Industry 4.0 Shipyard

    Tiago M. Fernández-Caramés;Paula Fraga-Lamas;Manuel Suárez-Albela;Miguel Vilar-Montesinos

  • Enabling the Internet of Mobile Crowdsourcing Health Things: A Mobile Fog Computing, Blockchain and IoT Based Continuous Glucose Monitoring System for Diabetes Mellitus Research and Care

    Tiago M Fernández-Caramés;Iván Froiz-Míguez;Oscar Blanco-Novoa;Paula Fraga-Lamas

  • A Review on IoT Deep Learning UAV Systems for Autonomous Obstacle Detection and Collision Avoidance

    Paula Fraga-Lamas;Lucía Ramos;Víctor Manuel Mondéjar-Guerra;Tiago M. Fernández-Caramés

  • A Practical Evaluation of a High-Security Energy-Efficient Gateway for IoT Fog Computing Applications.

    Manuel Suárez-Albela;Tiago M. Fernández-Caramés;Paula Fraga-Lamas;Luis Castedo

  • A comparative study of STBC transmissions at 2.4 GHz over indoor channels using a 2 × 2 MIMO testbed

    David Ramírez;Ignacio Santamaría;Jesús Pérez;Javier Vía

Frequent Co-Authors

Paula Fraga-Lamas
Paula Fraga-Lamas University of A Coruña
Francisco Falcone
Francisco Falcone Universidad Publica De Navarra
Ignacio Santamaria
Ignacio Santamaria University of Cantabria

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Computer Science degree in the USA is now more accessible than ever. For those looking for flexible options, numerous online associate degree programs in Computer Science and related fields can serve as excellent stepping stones into tech careers. These programs are ideal for students who prefer a shorter, career-focused pathway.

Cost is a major consideration for many prospective students. Fortunately, there are most affordable online colleges offering quality Computer Science degrees without breaking the bank. These institutions are often designed for budget-conscious learners seeking value.

Worried about academic history? Several online graduate schools with low gpa requirements can help those with less-than-perfect transcripts pursue advanced degrees and unlock new career growth opportunities.

Beyond coding, Computer Science skills are valuable in interdisciplinary areas. For instance, graduates might also be interested in environmental technology, a field highlighted in this guide on what jobs can you get with an environmental science degree. Exploring related pathways can lead to innovative and impactful careers.

Best Scientists Citing Tiago M. Fernández-Caramés

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles