World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
33
Citations
4082
World Ranking
12763
National Ranking
5149

Mainak Chatterjee publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mainak Chatterjee sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 213 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Mainak Chatterjee D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mainak Chatterjee sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mainak Chatterjee is affiliated with the University of Central Florida in the United States. Their research work spans multiple fields within computer science and engineering, with specific emphasis on computer networks and communications, electrical and electronic engineering, information systems, mathematical physics, and condensed matter physics.

The research topics explored by Mainak Chatterjee cover a diverse range of areas, including:

  • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics
  • Theoretical and Computational Physics
  • Advanced MIMO Systems Optimization
  • IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Caching and Content Delivery
  • Distributed Sensor Networks and Detection Algorithms

Their recent publications include the following works:

  • "A survey on consensus methods in blockchain for resource-constrained IoT networks" (2020) published in Internet of Things
  • "A Prospect Theoretic Approach for Trust Management in IoT Networks Under Manipulation Attacks" (2020) published in ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks
  • "Steady states and phase transitions in heterogeneous asymmetric exclusion processes" (2022) published in Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment
  • "Adaptive streaming of HD and 360 ° videos over software defined radios" (2020) published in Pervasive and Mobile Computing
  • "Steady states and phase transitions in heterogeneous asymmetric exclusion processes" (2021) published in arXiv (Cornell University)

Mainak Chatterjee has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Mehrdad Salimitari, Yaser P. Fallah, Atri Goswami, Sudip Mukherjee, and Shameek Bhattacharjee.

The primary venues for their research publications include:

  • Internet of Things
  • ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks
  • Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment
  • Pervasive and Mobile Computing
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Best Publications

  • WCA: A Weighted Clustering Algorithm for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

    Mainak Chatterjee;Sajal K. Das;Damla Turgut

  • A cluster-based approach for routing in dynamic networks

    P. Krishna;N. H. Vaidya;M. Chatterjee;D. K. Pradhan

  • An on-demand weighted clustering algorithm (WCA) for ad hoc networks

    M. Chatterjee;S. K. Das;D. Turgut

  • An economic framework for dynamic spectrum access and service pricing

    Shamik Sengupta;Mainak Chatterjee

  • An Economic Framework for Spectrum Allocation and Service Pricing with Competitive Wireless Service Providers

    S. Sengupta;M. Chatterjee;S. Ganguly

  • A Game Theoretic Framework for Power Control in Wireless Sensor Networks

    S. Sengupta;M. Chatterjee;K.A. Kwiat

  • RFAL: Adversarial Learning for RF Transmitter Identification and Classification

    Debashri Roy;Tathagata Mukherjee;Mainak Chatterjee;Erik Blasch

  • ARC: an integrated admission and rate control framework for competitive wireless CDMA data networks using noncooperative games

    Haitao Lin;M. Chatterjee;S.K. Das;K. Basu

  • Improving Quality of VoIP Streams over WiMax

    S. Sengupta;M. Chatterjee;S. Ganguly

  • A Survey on Consensus Methods in Blockchain for Resource-constrained IoT Networks

    Mehrdad Salimitari;Mainak Chatterjee;Yaser P. Fallah

  • An integrated cross-layer study of wireless CDMA sensor networks

    S. De;Chunming Qiao;D.A. Pados;M. Chatterjee

  • Longevity of routes in mobile ad hoc networks

    D. Turgut;S.K. Das;M. Chatterjee

  • Review: Vulnerabilities in cognitive radio networks: A survey

    Shameek Bhattacharjee;Shamik Sengupta;Mainak Chatterjee

  • Inferring video QoE in real time

    Mukundan Venkataraman;Mainak Chatterjee

  • Small-Scale and Large-Scale Routing in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks

    Wenjing Wang;Fei Xie;M. Chatterjee

  • An econometric model for resource management in competitive wireless data networks

    S.K. Das;H. Lin;M. Chatterjee

  • A Survey on Consensus Protocols in Blockchain for IoT Networks

    Mehrdad Salimitari;Mainak Chatterjee

  • Enhancements to Cognitive Radio Based IEEE 802.22 Air-Interface

    S. Sengupta;S. Brahma;M. Chatterjee;N. Sai Shankar

  • Designing auction mechanisms for dynamic spectrum access

    Shamik Sengupta;Mainak Chatterjee

  • A Game Theoretic Framework for Distributed Self-Coexistence Among IEEE 802.22 Networks

    S. Sengupta;R. Chandramouli;S. Brahma;M. Chatterjee

  • Evaluating Quality of Experience for Streaming Video in Real Time

    Mukundan Venkataraman;Mainak Chatterjee;Siddhartha Chattopadhyay

  • Congestion control and fairness in wireless sensor networks

    Swastik Brahma;Mainak Chatterjee;Kevin Kwiat

  • Traffic management in wireless sensor networks: Decoupling congestion control and fairness

    Swastik Brahma;Mainak Chatterjee;Kevin Kwiat;Pramod K. Varshney

Frequent Co-Authors

Sajal K. Das
Sajal K. Das Missouri University of Science and Technology
Charles A. Kamhoua
Charles A. Kamhoua United States Army Research Laboratory
Cliff C. Zou
Cliff C. Zou University of Central Florida
Andrea Passarella
Andrea Passarella National Research Council (CNR)
Dimitris A. Pados
Dimitris A. Pados Florida Atlantic University
Jiannong Cao
Jiannong Cao Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Pramod K. Varshney
Pramod K. Varshney Syracuse University
Chunming Qiao
Chunming Qiao University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Walid Saad
Walid Saad Virginia Tech
Julian Cheng
Julian Cheng University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to many online degree and career options. If you’re exploring interdisciplinary paths, consider a related online program such as an electrical engineering degree online admissions pathway, which offers technical skills closely aligned with computer science and is growing in demand.

For those seeking a quicker route into specialized positions, short-term programs and certifications that pay well can provide an efficient boost to your career prospects. These credentials are often highly valued by employers in technology and engineering fields.

If you want to advance your qualifications rapidly, the quickest online masters degree programs can provide a flexible way to upskill without long campus commitments. Additionally, pursuing one of the most in demand masters degrees can significantly improve your career advancement opportunities in technology, business, and emerging sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Mainak Chatterjee

Trending Scientists