World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 52 5084 4945 35 34 363 10792

Manuel Wimmer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Manuel Wimmer between 2005 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Manuel Wimmer published across 22 years, from 2005 to 2026, averaging 19.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2021. 18 of the 430 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2021. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 5 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 21 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 26 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 27 publications 2016: 30 publications 2017: 30 publications 2018: 27 publications 2019: 30 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 32 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 25 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 12 publications 2026: 6 publications
2005 2026

430 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Manuel Wimmer: publications per year, 2005 to 2026
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 5
2007 7
2008 6
2009 18
2010 21
2011 18
2012 26
2013 23
2014 22
2015 27
2016 30
2017 30
2018 27
2019 30
2020 22
2021 32
2022 23
2023 25
2024 19
2025 12
2026 6
Total 430
Download as CSV

Manuel Wimmer publications per year - data summary

  • Manuel Wimmer, a Computer Science scholar from Johannes Kepler University of Linz, has 430 publications recorded across 22 years, from 2005 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2005 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2021, with 32 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 2005, with 1 publication.
  • The rate of publication averages 19.5 papers per year over the whole span, or 19.5 per year counting only the 22 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 85 publications, 20% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2005-2012: 102 publications (12.8 per year); 2013-2020: 211 publications (26.4 per year); 2021-2026: 117 publications (19.5 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Manuel Wimmer publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Manuel Wimmer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 362–371 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 363 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176 363
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Manuel Wimmer publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 32–41 to 991+ publications.
  • Manuel Wimmer, a Computer Science scholar from Johannes Kepler University of Linz, records 363 publications - the 83rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 83% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Manuel Wimmer, and about 17% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 202–211 publications range, and Manuel Wimmer ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 142–151 publications, holding 609 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 272–281 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 991 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Manuel Wimmer D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Manuel Wimmer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518 52
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Manuel Wimmer D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 52 ranges running from 30–31 to 131+ D-Index.
  • Manuel Wimmer, a Computer Science scholar from Johannes Kepler University of Linz, records 52 D-Index - the 65th percentile of the discipline.
  • 65% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Manuel Wimmer, and about 35% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44–45 D-Index range, and Manuel Wimmer ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 36–37 D-Index, holding 990 scientists (7% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54–55 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Manuel Wimmer is affiliated with Johannes Kepler University of Linz in Austria. Their research spans multiple fields and subfields within computer science and engineering, focusing particularly on software engineering and industrial applications.

The main fields of study for Wimmer include:

  • Computer Science
  • Engineering

Within these broad fields, their work covers several subfields such as:

  • Software
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Information Systems
  • Computer Networks and Communications

Key topics in their research portfolio include:

  • Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
  • Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
  • Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Manufacturing Process and Optimization
  • Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
  • Business Process Modeling and Analysis

Recent notable publications by Manuel Wimmer include:

  • Low-code development and model-driven engineering: Two sides of the same coin?, 2022, Software & Systems Modeling
  • Conceptualizing Digital Twins, 2021, IEEE Software
  • Digital Twin Platforms: Requirements, Capabilities, and Future Prospects, 2021, IEEE Software
  • A Cross-Domain Systematic Mapping Study on Software Engineering for Digital Twins, 2022, Journal of Systems and Software
  • A Hitchhiker's Guide to Model-Driven Engineering for Data-Centric Systems, 2020, IEEE Software

Wimmer has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Andreas Wortmann
  • Benoît Combemale
  • Daniel Lehner
  • Ludovico Iovino
  • Davide Di Ruscio

Their works have been published extensively in venues such as:

  • Software & Systems Modeling
  • 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems Companion (MODELS-C)
  • Journal of Systems and Software
  • IEEE Software
  • The Journal of Object Technology

In addition to journal and conference papers, Manuel Wimmer has contributed to books published by Springer Science+Business Media, with titles including:

  • Software Quality: Future Perspectives on Software Engineering Quality, 2021
  • Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering, 2022
  • Software Quality: The Next Big Thing in Software Engineering and Quality, 2022
  • Web Engineering, 2023

Best Publications

  • Model-Driven Software Engineering in Practice

    Marco Brambilla;Jordi Cabot;Manuel Wimmer

  • A survey on model versioning approaches

    Kerstin Altmanninger;Martina Seidl;Manuel Wimmer

  • Lifting metamodels to ontologies : A step to the semantic integration of modeling languages

    Gerti Kappel;Elisabeth Kapsammer;Horst Kargl;Gerhard Kramler

  • Towards Model Transformation Generation By-Example

    M. Wimmer;M. Strommer;H. Kargl;G. Kramler

  • Bridging grammarware and modelware

    Manuel Wimmer;Gerhard Kramler

  • Model-Driven Software Engineering in Practice: Second Edition

    Marco Brambilla;Jordi Cabot;Manuel Wimmer

  • A Systematic Review of Cloud Modeling Languages

    Alexander Bergmayr;Uwe Breitenbücher;Nicolas Ferry;Alessandro Rossini

  • Model transformation intents and their properties

    Levi Lúcio;Moussa Amrani;Juergen Dingel;Leen Lambers

  • A survey on UML-based aspect-oriented design modeling

    Manuel Wimmer;Andrea Schauerhuber;Gerti Kappel;Werner Retschitzegger

  • Modeling languages in Industry 4.0: an extended systematic mapping study

    Andreas Wortmann;Olivier Barais;Benoit Combemale;Manuel Wimmer

  • Model transformation by-example: a survey of the first wave

    Gerti Kappel;Philip Langer;Werner Retschitzegger;Wieland Schwinger

  • Automated verification of model transformations based on visual contracts

    Esther Guerra;Juan Lara;Manuel Wimmer;Gerti Kappel

  • Thirteen years of SysML: a systematic mapping study

    Sabine Wolny;Alexandra Mazak;Christine Carpella;Verena Geist

  • Conceptualizing Digital Twins

    Romina Eramo;Francis Bordeleau;Benoit Combemale;Mark van den Brand

  • An introduction to model versioning

    Petra Brosch;Gerti Kappel;Philip Langer;Martina Seidl

  • xMOF: Executable DSMLs Based on fUML

    Tanja Mayerhofer;Philip Langer;Manuel Wimmer;Gerti Kappel

  • Bridging grammarware and modelware

    Manuel Wimmer;Gerhard Kramler

  • Explicit transformation modeling

    Thomas Kühne;Gergely Mezei;Eugene Syriani;Hans Vangheluwe

  • A feature-based survey of model view approaches

    Hugo Bruneliere;Erik Burger;Jordi Cabot;Manuel Wimmer

  • Reuse in model-to-model transformation languages: are we there yet?

    A. Kusel;J. Schönböck;M. Wimmer;G. Kappel

  • Static Fault Localization in Model Transformations

    Loli Burgueno;Javier Troya;Manuel Wimmer;Antonio Vallecillo

Frequent Co-Authors

Werner Retschitzegger
Werner Retschitzegger Johannes Kepler University of Linz
Antonio Vallecillo
Antonio Vallecillo University of Malaga
Marouane Kessentini
Marouane Kessentini University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Birgit Vogel-Heuser
Birgit Vogel-Heuser Technical University of Munich
Houari Sahraoui
Houari Sahraoui University of Montreal
Jordi Cabot
Jordi Cabot Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats
Richard F. Paige
Richard F. Paige McMaster University
Gabriele Taentzer
Gabriele Taentzer Philipp University of Marburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Computer Science degree opens doors to a wide range of related disciplines and online learning options. Many students are now considering specialized fields that connect closely with technology and innovation. For example, those interested in sustainable solutions may want to look into an environmental engineering degree online to combine computing with environmental problem-solving.

Cost is a significant consideration when selecting a program. Comparing the mechanical engineering cost of education can help students make informed financial decisions and plan their career investments wisely.

For those who are fascinated by research and theoretical concepts, there are flexible online physics degrees that offer opportunities to build strong analytical and problem-solving skills.

Additionally, the growing field of data analysis makes pursuing a data science degree increasingly popular, leading many to explore careers at the intersection of computer science and industry needs.

Best Scientists Citing Manuel Wimmer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles