World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Uwe Breitenbücher

Uwe Breitenbücher

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
31
Citations
4399
World Ranking
13613
National Ranking
656

Uwe Breitenbücher publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Uwe Breitenbücher sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 180 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Uwe Breitenbücher D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Uwe Breitenbücher sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Uwe Breitenbücher is affiliated with the University of Stuttgart in Germany and has published extensively in the field of computer science. Their research spans multiple subfields, primarily focusing on information systems, computer networks and communications, and artificial intelligence.

The scientist's research interests cover a range of topics including:

  • Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
  • Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
  • Cloud Computing and Resource Management
  • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Business Process Modeling and Analysis
  • Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems

Breitenbücher has published 86 works indexed under computer science, with 40 of those focused on information systems and 29 on computer networks and communications. The research contributions appear predominantly in venues such as Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), where they have 21 publications, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, arXiv, ACM Computing Surveys, and the CINECA IRIS Institutional research information system at the University of Pisa.

Significant recent papers include:

  • "FaaSten your decisions: A classification framework and technology review of function-as-a-Service platforms" (2021), published at CINECA IRIS Institutional research information system (University of Pisa)
  • "Standards-based modeling and deployment of serverless function orchestrations using BPMN and TOSCA" (2022), published in Software Practice and Experience
  • "Cross-Chain Smart Contract Invocations: A Systematic Multi-Vocal Literature Review" (2023), published in ACM Computing Surveys
  • "Trending Topics in Software Engineering" (2022), published in ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes
  • "An Integrated Management System for Composed Applications Deployed by Different Deployment Automation Technologies" (2023), published in SN Computer Science

Collaborative work is a notable aspect of Breitenbücher's career, with frequent co-authorship alongside researchers such as Frank Leymann, Jacopo Soldani, Steffen Becker, Lukas Harzenetter, and Vladimir Yussupov. These collaborations have yielded numerous publications, with the highest count of joint works being 36 with Frank Leymann.

Best Publications

  • OpenTOSCA --- A Runtime for TOSCA-Based Cloud Applications

    Tobias Binz;Uwe Breitenbücher;Florian Haupt;Oliver Kopp

  • TOSCA: Portable Automated Deployment and Management of Cloud Applications

    Tobias Binz;Uwe Breitenbücher;Oliver Kopp;Frank Leymann

  • Comparison of IoT platform architectures: A field study based on a reference architecture

    Jasmin Guth;Uwe Breitenbucher;Michael Falkenthal;Frank Leymann

  • Winery --- A Modeling Tool for TOSCA-Based Cloud Applications

    Oliver Kopp;Tobias Binz;Uwe Breitenbücher;Frank Leymann

  • A Detailed Analysis of IoT Platform Architectures: Concepts, Similarities, and Differences

    Jasmin Guth;Uwe Breitenbücher;Michael Falkenthal;Paul Fremantle

  • Combining Declarative and Imperative Cloud Application Provisioning Based on TOSCA

    Uwe Breitenbücher;Tobias Binz;Kálmán Képes;Oliver Kopp

  • A Systematic Review of Cloud Modeling Languages

    Alexander Bergmayr;Uwe Breitenbücher;Nicolas Ferry;Alessandro Rossini

  • Streamlining DevOps automation for Cloud applications using TOSCA as standardized metamodel

    Johannes Wettinger;Uwe Breitenbücher;Oliver Kopp;Frank Leymann

  • The essential deployment metamodel: a systematic review of deployment automation technologies

    Michael Wurster;Uwe Breitenbücher;Michael Falkenthal;Christoph Krieger

  • Standards-Based DevOps Automation and Integration Using TOSCA

    Johannes Wettinger;Uwe Breitenbucher;Frank Leymann

  • Internet of things patterns

    Lukas Reinfurt;Uwe Breitenbücher;Michael Falkenthal;Frank Leymann

  • Vino4TOSCA: A Visual Notation for Application Topologies Based on TOSCA

    Uwe Breitenbücher;Tobias Binz;Oliver Kopp;Frank Leymann

  • BPMN4TOSCA: A Domain-Specific Language to Model Management Plans for Composite Applications

    Oliver Kopp;Tobias Binz;Uwe Breitenbücher;Frank Leymann

  • Vinothek - A Self-Service Portal for TOSCA.

    Uwe Breitenbücher;Tobias Binz;Oliver Kopp;Frank Leymann

  • DevOpSlang – Bridging the Gap between Development and Operations

    Johannes Wettinger;Uwe Breitenbücher;Frank Leymann

  • Integrating Configuration Management with Model-driven Cloud Management based on TOSCA

    Johannes Wettinger;Michael Behrendt;Tobias Binz;Uwe Breitenbücher

  • Integrated Cloud Application Provisioning: Interconnecting Service-Centric and Script-Centric Management Technologies

    Uwe Breitenbücher;Tobias Binz;Oliver Kopp;Frank Leymann

  • Pattern-based Runtime Management of Composite Cloud Applications.

    Uwe Breitenbücher;Tobias Binz;Oliver Kopp;Frank Leymann

  • Policy4TOSCA: A Policy-Aware Cloud Service Provisioning Approach to Enable Secure Cloud Computing

    Tim Waizenegger;Matthias Wieland;Tobias Binz;Uwe Breitenbücher

  • Unified Invocation of Scripts and Services for Provisioning, Deployment, and Management of Cloud Applications Based on TOSCA

    Johannes Wettinger;Tobias Binz;Uwe Breitenbücher;Oliver Kopp

  • Towards situation-aware adaptive workflows: SitOPT — A general purpose situation-aware workflow management system

    Matthias Wieland;Holger Schwarz;Uwe Breitenbucher;Frank Leymann

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank Leymann
Frank Leymann University of Stuttgart
Oliver Kopp
Oliver Kopp University of Hamburg
Antonio Brogi
Antonio Brogi University of Pisa
Manuel Wimmer
Manuel Wimmer Johannes Kepler University of Linz
Florian Daniel
Florian Daniel Polytechnic University of Milan
Jorge Cardoso
Jorge Cardoso University of Coimbra
Antonio Puliafito
Antonio Puliafito University of Messina
Dieter Roller
Dieter Roller University of Stuttgart

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can significantly broaden your career options after studying Computer Science in the USA. Today, more students are opting for flexible learning by attending some of the good online colleges, which offer fully-accredited programs and recognized qualifications.

If you're interested in creative technology, a game design masters online may be an exciting way to combine programming, art, and interactive storytelling. In contrast, the technology industry also has a high demand for security professionals, making a cybersecurity degree online an excellent choice for those wanting to protect digital assets and data.

Even fields like construction now require digital fluency; a cheapest construction management degree online can prepare you for leadership roles in a tech-driven construction industry. Exploring these flexible online pathways can help you find a specialized, rewarding, and future-proof career in technology or related sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Uwe Breitenbücher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles