World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 34 12326 11967 430 426 208 2813

Flora Amato publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Flora Amato between 2008 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Flora Amato published across 19 years, from 2008 to 2026, averaging 11.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 38 publications in 2017. 11 of the 219 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 38. Peak 38 publications in 2017. 2008: 7 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 23 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 38 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 9 publications 2026: 2 publications
2008 2026

219 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Flora Amato: publications per year, 2008 to 2026
Year Publications
2008 7
2009 5
2010 3
2011 8
2012 7
2013 15
2014 15
2015 23
2016 21
2017 38
2018 24
2019 17
2020 7
2021 10
2022 4
2023 2
2024 2
2025 9
2026 2
Total 219
Download as CSV

Flora Amato publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Flora Amato sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 202–211 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 208 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508 208
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Flora Amato D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Flora Amato sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918 34
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Flora Amato is affiliated with the University of Naples Federico II in Italy. Their research spans multiple areas within computer science, engineering, and social sciences, with a particular focus on topics at the intersection of technology and law, digital forensics, and artificial intelligence.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Computer Science
  • Engineering
  • Social Sciences

Within these fields, the scientist has made contributions to the following subfields:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Information Systems
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Building and Construction

The primary research topics addressed in their work cover:

  • Artificial Intelligence in Law
  • Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Topic Modeling
  • Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Digital and Cyber Forensics
  • Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

Recent papers authored by Flora Amato include:

  • "CAN-Bus Attack Detection With Deep Learning", 2021, published in IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
  • "A semantic-based methodology for digital forensics analysis", 2020, published in Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing
  • "A Model for Verification and Validation of Law Compliance of Smart Contracts in IoT Environment", 2021, published in IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
  • "An agent-based approach for recommending cultural tours", 2020, published in Pattern Recognition Letters
  • "Enhancing random forest classification with NLP in DAMEH: A system for DAta Management in eHealth Domain", 2021, published in Neurocomputing

Their publications have appeared frequently in venues including:

  • Information
  • IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
  • Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing
  • IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
  • Pattern Recognition Letters

Flora Amato has also contributed to book publications through notable publishers:

  • Advances on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing, 2020, Springer International Publishing
  • Advanced Information Networking and Applications, 2020, Springer Nature

Regular collaborators in their work include:

  • Francesco Moscato
  • Giovanni Cozzolino
  • Mattia Fonisto
  • Vincenzo Moscato
  • Francesco Bonavolontà

Best Publications

  • The Talking Museum Project

    Flora Amato;Angelo Chianese;Antonino Mazzeo;Vincenzo Moscato

  • SOS: A multimedia recommender System for Online Social networks

    Flora Amato;Vincenzo Moscato;Antonio Picariello;Francesco Piccialli

  • Recognizing human behaviours in online social networks

    Flora Amato;Aniello Castiglione;Aniello De Santo;Vincenzo Moscato

  • SNOPS: a smart environment for cultural heritage applications

    Flora Amato;Angelo Chianese;Vincenzo Moscato;Antonio Picariello

  • Exploiting Cloud Technologies and Context Information for Recommending Touristic Paths

    Flora Amato;Antonino Mazzeo;Vincenzo Moscato;Antonio Picariello

  • Exploiting Cloud and Workflow Patterns for the Analysis of Composite Cloud Services

    Flora Amato;Francesco Moscato

  • CAN-Bus Attack Detection With Deep Learning

    Flora Amato;Luigi Coppolino;Francesco Mercaldo;Francesco Moscato

  • A model driven approach to data privacy verification in E-Health systems

    Flora Amato;Francesco Moscato

  • Model-driven engineering of cloud components in MetaMORPhOSY

    Francesco Moscato;Flora Amato;Alba Amato;Rocco Aversa

  • Big Data Meets Digital Cultural Heritage: Design and Implementation of SCRABS, A Smart Context-awaRe Browsing Assistant for Cultural EnvironmentS

    Flora Amato;Vincenzo Moscato;Antonio Picariello;Francesco Colace

  • Pattern-based orchestration and automatic verification of composite cloud services

    Flora Amato;Francesco Moscato

  • Terminological ontology learning and population using latent Dirichlet allocation

    Francesco Colace;Massimo De Santo;Luca Greco;Flora Amato

  • Analyse digital forensic evidences through a semantic-based methodology and NLP techniques

    Flora Amato;Giovanni Cozzolino;Vincenzo Moscato;Francesco Moscato

  • Chatbots Meet eHealth: Automatizing Healthcare

    Flora Amato;Stefano Marrone;Vincenzo Moscato;Gabriele Piantadosi

  • Multimedia Social Network Modeling: A Proposal

    Flora Amato;Vincenzo Moscato;Antonio Picariello;Giancarlo Sperli

  • Multilayer Perceptron: An Intelligent Model for Classification and Intrusion Detection

    Flora Amato;Nicola Mazzocca;Francesco Moscato;Emilio Vivenzio

  • Challenge: Processing web texts for classifying job offers

    Flora Amato;Roberto Boselli;Mirko Cesarini;Fabio Mercorio

  • An FPGA-Based Smart Classifier for Decision Support Systems

    Flora Amato;Mario Barbareschi;Valentina Casola;Antonino Mazzeo

  • Multimedia story creation on social networks

    Flora Amato;Aniello Castiglione;Aniello Castiglione;Fabio Mercorio;Mario Mezzanzanica

  • Centrality in heterogeneous social networks for lurkers detection: An approach based on hypergraphs

    Flora Amato;Vincenzo Moscato;Antonio Picariello;Francesco Piccialli

  • Building RDF Ontologies from Semi-Structured Legal Documents

    F. Amato;A. Mazzeo;A. Penta;A. Picariello

  • Recommendation in Social Media Networks

    Flora Amato;Vincenzo Moscato;Antonio Picariello;Giancarlo Sperli

  • A Framework for Semantic Interoperability over the Cloud

    F. Amato;A. Mazzeo;V. Moscato;A. Picariello

  • Improving security in cloud by formal modeling of IaaS resources

    Flora Amato;Francesco Moscato;Vincenzo Moscato;Francesco Colace

Frequent Co-Authors

Antonio Picariello
Antonio Picariello University of Naples Federico II
Vincenzo Moscato
Vincenzo Moscato University of Naples Federico II
Fatos Xhafa
Fatos Xhafa Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
Carlo Sansone
Carlo Sansone University of Naples Federico II
Aniello Castiglione
Aniello Castiglione University of Salerno
Leonard Barolli
Leonard Barolli Fukuoka Institute of Technology
Francesco Piccialli
Francesco Piccialli University of Naples Federico II
Joanna Kolodziej
Joanna Kolodziej NASK National Research Institute
Giuseppe De Pietro
Giuseppe De Pietro National Research Council (CNR)
Leopoldo Angrisani
Leopoldo Angrisani University of Naples Federico II

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degree programs and lucrative career opportunities. Many students explore fields such as engineering, physics, and data science to diversify their technical skills and job options.

If you’re considering a sustainable or tech-focused career, an online environmental engineering degree can complement your computer science background. For those interested in innovation and design, understanding the mechanical engineering cost of education is an essential step in planning your future.

Strong analytical and problem-solving skills gained through a computer science degree also align well with physics and data-driven fields. Students looking for affordable options can review the cheapest online physics degree programs. Additionally, the rapid growth of big data makes earning a data science degree in the USA an appealing path for ambitious students.

Exploring these related online degrees not only broadens your expertise but also enhances your employability in a competitive global market.

Best Scientists Citing Flora Amato

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles