World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
97
Citations
45928
World Ranking
416
National Ranking
229

Katia Sycara publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katia Sycara sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 767 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Katia Sycara D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katia Sycara sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2006 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to case based reasoning, multi-agent systems and semantic web services and standards.
  • 2002 - Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) For significant contributions to case-based reasoning, autonomous agents, and multiagent systems.

Overview

Katia Sycara is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States. Their research focuses on several areas within computer science and engineering, particularly in robotic path planning, control systems, and artificial intelligence.

The scientist's recent publications include:

  • OffRIPP: Offline RL-based Informative Path Planning, 2024, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • DyPNIPP: Predicting Environment Dynamics for RL-based Robust Informative Path Planning, 2024, arXiv (Cornell University)

Key topics covered in their work consist of:

  • Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
  • Control and Dynamics of Mobile Robots
  • Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
  • Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Algorithms and Data Compression

The main fields of study in which they have contributed are:

  • Computer Science
  • Engineering

Within these fields, their subfields include:

  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Computational Mechanics
  • Aerospace Engineering
  • Artificial Intelligence

Sycara frequently publishes in the venue arXiv (Cornell University).

The scientist collaborates with a number of co-authors on their research, including:

  • Srujan Deolasee
  • Siva Kailas
  • Wenhao Luo
  • Woojun Kim
  • Srikar Babu Gadipudi

Recognition for their work includes:

  • IEEE Fellow (2006) for contributions to case-based reasoning, multi-agent systems, and semantic web services and standards
  • Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) (2002) for significant contributions to case-based reasoning, autonomous agents, and multiagent systems

Best Publications

  • Semantic Matching of Web Services Capabilities

    Massimo Paolucci;Takahiro Kawamura;Terry R. Payne;Katia P. Sycara

  • DAML-S: semantic markup for web services

    Anupriya Ankolekar;Mark Burstein;Jerry R. Hobbs;Ora Lassila

  • A Roadmap of Agent Research and Development

    Unknown

  • DAML-S: Web Service Description for the Semantic Web

    Mark H. Burstein;Jerry R. Hobbs;Ora Lassila;David Martin

  • Bringing semantics to web services: the OWL-S approach

    David Martin;Massimo Paolucci;Sheila McIlraith;Mark Burstein

  • Distributed intelligent agents

    K. Sycara;A. Pannu;M. Willamson;Dajun Zeng

  • Automated discovery, interaction and composition of Semantic Web services

    Katia P. Sycara;Massimo Paolucci;Anupriya Ankolekar;Naveen Srinivasan

  • WebMate: a personal agent for browsing and searching

    Liren Chen;Katia Sycara

  • The Semantic Web - ISWC 2003

    Dieter Fensel;Katia Sycara;John Mylopoulos

  • Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation

    Sarit Kraus;Katia Sycara;Amir Evenchik

  • Middle-Agents for the Internet.

    Keith Decker;Katia P. Sycara;Mike Williamson

  • Automated semantic web service discovery with OWLS-MX

    Matthias Klusch;Benedikt Fries;Katia Sycara

  • Larks: Dynamic Matchmaking Among Heterogeneous Software Agents in Cyberspace

    Katia Sycara;Seth Widoff;Matthias Klusch;Jianguo Lu

  • Bringing Semantics to Web Services with OWL-S

    David Martin;Mark Burstein;Drew Mcdermott;Sheila Mcilraith

  • Bayesian learning in negotiation

    Dajun Zeng;Katia Sycara

  • Importing the Semantic Web in UDDI

    Massimo Paolucci;Takahiro Kawamura;Takahiro Kawamura;Terry R. Payne;Katia P. Sycara

  • Dynamic service matchmaking among agents in open information environments

    Katia Sycara;Matthias Klusch;Seth Widoff;Jianguo Lu

  • The RETSINA MAS Infrastructure

    Katia Sycara;Massimo Paolucci;Martin Van Velsen;Joseph Giampapa

  • DAML-S: A Semantic Markup Language For Web Services

    Anupriya Ankolenkar;Mark Burstein;Jerry Hobbs;Ora Lassila

  • Human Interaction With Robot Swarms: A Survey

    Andreas Kolling;Phillip Walker;Nilanjan Chakraborty;Katia Sycara

  • OWLS-MX: A hybrid Semantic Web service matchmaker for OWL-S services

    Matthias Klusch;Benedikt Fries;Katia Sycara

Frequent Co-Authors

Massimo Paolucci
Massimo Paolucci NTT (Japan)
Timothy J. Norman
Timothy J. Norman University of Southampton
Terry R. Payne
Terry R. Payne University of Liverpool
Cuihong Li
Cuihong Li Beijing Normal University
Onn Shehory
Onn Shehory Bar-Ilan University
Keith Decker
Keith Decker University of Delaware
Matthias Klusch
Matthias Klusch German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence
Christian Lebiere
Christian Lebiere Carnegie Mellon University
Norman Sadeh
Norman Sadeh Carnegie Mellon University
Nigel Shadbolt
Nigel Shadbolt University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees opens up flexible options for students aiming to advance their careers in technology and related industries. Many learners are drawn to specialized programs like a cheap online masters degree in data science, which offers in-demand skills at a lower cost. These programs are ideal for those interested in data, analytics, and tech-driven roles.

For those with an interest beyond core computer science, options like a 2 year construction management degree online are growing in popularity. These degrees prepare students for leadership roles in construction and project management, blending technical knowledge with business acumen.

Business-minded students might consider online mba programs affordable, which can be completed while balancing work or other commitments. These programs typically focus on management, strategy, and leadership skills relevant across various industries.

Finally, if you're seeking speed and efficiency, you might explore one year masters programs online. These accelerated paths offer intensive study, letting students earn advanced credentials in less time without sacrificing academic rigor. Together, these options expand the pathways available in technology and business fields.

Best Scientists Citing Katia Sycara

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles