World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
9321
World Ranking
9570
National Ranking
4053

Keith Decker publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith Decker sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 141 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Keith Decker D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith Decker sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Keith Decker is affiliated with the University of Delaware in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with particular emphasis on stroke rehabilitation and recovery. This specialization is reflected in numerous publications addressing topics related to neurological disorders, rehabilitation, and health management technologies.

Their recent scholarly output includes several papers published between 2021 and 2025, highlighting contributions across prominent journals and venues. Notable works include:

  • Multi Agent Architecture for Automated Health Coaching, 2021, Journal of Medical Systems
  • Self-Management among Stroke Survivors in the United States, 2016 to 2021, 2024, Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Towards Dynamic Action Planning with user preferences in Automated Health Coaching, 2023, Smart Health
  • Beyond the Genetic Code: A Tissue Code?, 2023, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Abstract DP52: Adherence to Physical Activity Recommendations among Stroke Survivors in the United States, 2025, Stroke

Keith Decker frequently collaborates with several coauthors across their publications. The most common collaborators include:

  • Ajith Vemuri
  • Alireza Vafaei Sadr
  • Shouhao Zhou
  • Jonathan G. Hakun
  • Vida Abedi

The scientist's work is regularly published in specific venues, reflecting the focused nature of their research. These venues are:

  • Stroke
  • Journal of Medical Systems
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Smart Health
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Within their medical research, Keith Decker's subfields of study include Rehabilitation, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Human-Computer Interaction, Oncology, and General Health Professions.

The primary topics explored in their work encompass:

  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Neurological Disorders and Treatments

This profile presents an overview of Keith Decker's academic career, highlighting their involvement in medicine-related research supporting stroke rehabilitation, health coaching, and related computational systems with a multidisciplinary approach spanning technology and clinical science domains.

Best Publications

  • Distributed intelligent agents

    K. Sycara;A. Pannu;M. Willamson;Dajun Zeng

  • Middle-Agents for the Internet.

    Keith Decker;Katia P. Sycara;Mike Williamson

  • Selecting uncertainty calculi and granularity: an experiment in trading-off precision and complexity

    Piero P. Bonissone;Keith S. Decker

  • Designing a family of coordination algorithms

    Keith S. Decker;Victor R. Lesser

  • Intelligent portal engine

    Joseph B. Elad;Apperson H. Johnson;David S. Cleaver;Daniel L. Chester

  • Evolution of the GPGP/TÆMS domain-independent coordination framework

    Victor R. Lesser

  • Distributed problem-solving techniques: A survey

    K. S. Decker

  • Designing behaviors for information agents

    Keith Decker;Anandeep Pannu;Katia Sycara;Mike Williamson

  • Generalizing the Partial Global Planning Algorithm

    Keith S. Decker;Victor R. Lesser

  • Environment Centered Analysis and Design of Coordination Mechanisms

    Keith S. Decker;Victor R. Lesser

  • Intelligent Adaptive Information Agents

    Keith S. Decker;Katia Sycara

  • Coordinated hospital patient scheduling

    K. Decker;Jinjiang Li

  • Agent-oriented software engineering (workshop session)

    Paolo Ciancarini;Michael Wooldridge

  • GoFigure: automated Gene Ontology annotation

    Salim Khan;Gang Situ;Keith Decker;Carl J. Schmidt

  • Research directions for service-oriented multiagent systems

    M.N. Huhns;M.P. Singh;M. Burstein;K. Decker

  • Quantitative Modeling of Complex Environments

    Keith S. Decker;Victor R. Lesser

  • Quantitative modeling of complex computational task environments

    Keith Decker;Victor Lesser

  • Deploying power grid-integrated electric vehicles as a multi-agent system

    Sachin Kamboj;Willett Kempton;Keith S. Decker

  • DECAF - A Flexible Multi Agent System Architecture

    John R. Graham;Keith S. Decker;Michael Mersic

  • Computer and Information Sciences

    Erol Gelenbe;Ricardo Lent;Georgia Sakellari;Ahmet Sacan

  • Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 1

    Carles Sierra;Cristiano Castelfranchi;Keith S. Decker;Jaime Simão Sichman

  • Evolution of the GPGP/TÆMS Domain-Independent Coordination Framework 1,2

    V. Lesser;K. Decker;T. Wagner;N. Carver

Frequent Co-Authors

Victor Lesser
Victor Lesser University of Massachusetts Amherst
Terry R. Payne
Terry R. Payne University of Liverpool
Luc Moreau
Luc Moreau King's College London
Katia Sycara
Katia Sycara Carnegie Mellon University
Simon Miles
Simon Miles King's College London
Michael Luck
Michael Luck University of Sussex
Michael N. Huhns
Michael N. Huhns University of South Carolina
Edmund H. Durfee
Edmund H. Durfee University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Munindar P. Singh
Munindar P. Singh North Carolina State University
Cristiano Castelfranchi
Cristiano Castelfranchi National Research Council (CNR)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science opens the door to many related fields and flexible learning options. Those interested in speeding up their education can look into the fast track computer science degree, which allows students to earn their degree in less time while still gaining crucial technical skills.

Beyond computer science, interdisciplinary careers are on the rise. For example, with a environmental science degree, graduates can work in sustainability, conservation, or policy, blending technology with environmental initiatives.

If your interests include applying science and technology to solve environmental issues, the environmental engineering degree gives you the tools to design solutions for real-world problems. Similarly, pursuing an online mechanical engineering degree leads to dynamic roles in product design, automation, and manufacturing.

These degree pathways—especially offered online—offer flexibility and diverse career prospects for those passionate about technology, science, and making an impact.

Best Scientists Citing Keith Decker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles