World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
59
Citations
44733
World Ranking
566
National Ranking
291

John D. Kalbfleisch publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John D. Kalbfleisch sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 154 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

John D. Kalbfleisch D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John D. Kalbfleisch sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1994 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada Academy of Science
  • 1987 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Overview

John D. Kalbfleisch is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research spans several fields with a primary focus on mathematics, medicine, and economics, econometrics, and finance. Their work delves extensively into subfields such as statistics and probability, economics and econometrics, public health, environmental and occupational health, oncology, and infectious diseases.

The scientist's research topics include statistical methods and inference, health systems, economic evaluations, quality of life, statistical methods and Bayesian inference, healthcare policy and management, advanced causal inference techniques, statistical methods in clinical trials, and organ donation and transplantation.

Among recent publications, the following are notable:

  • Pitfalls of the concordance index for survival outcomes, 2023, published in Statistics in Medicine
  • Fifty Years of the Cox Model, 2022, published in Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application
  • Accounting for total variation and robustness in profiling health care providers, 2020, published in Biostatistics
  • Deceased donors as nondirected donors in kidney paired donation, 2020, published in American Journal of Transplantation
  • Kidney Paired Donation Chains Initiated by Deceased Donors, 2022, published in Kidney International Reports

Frequent collaborators in their work include Kevin He, Wenbo Wu, Xuemei Ding, Jian Kang, and Nicholas Hartman.

John D. Kalbfleisch has contributed to publications in several prominent venues including:

  • Statistics in Medicine
  • Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application
  • Biostatistics
  • Kidney International Reports
  • Journal of the American Statistical Association

Award recognitions include being named a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada in 1994 by the Academy of Science and a Fellow of the American Statistical Association in 1987.

Best Publications

  • The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data.

    Murray Aitkin;J. D. Kalbfleisch;R. L. Prentice

  • The statistical analysis of failure time data

    John D Kalbfleisch;Ross L Prentice

  • The analysis of failure times in the presence of competing risks.

    R. L. Prentice;J. D. Kalbfleisch;A. V. Peterson;N. Flournoy

  • Statistical Inference Under Order Restrictions

    J. D. Kalbfleisch

  • The Analysis of Panel Data under a Markov Assumption

    J. D. Kalbfleisch;J. F. Lawless

  • Marginal likelihoods based on Cox's regression and life model

    J. D. Kalbfleisch;R. L. Prentice

  • A Comparison of Cluster-Specific and Population-Averaged Approaches for Analyzing Correlated Binary Data

    J. M. Neuhaus;J. D. Kalbfleisch;W. W. Hauck

  • Application of Likelihood Methods to Models Involving Large Numbers of Parameters

    John D. Kalbfleisch;D. A. Sprott

  • Between- and within-cluster covariate effects in the analysis of clustered data.

    J M Neuhaus;J D Kalbfleisch

  • Misspecified proportional hazard models

    C. A. Struthers;J. D. Kalbfleisch

  • Non‐Parametric Bayesian Analysis of Survival Time Data

    John D. Kalbfleisch

  • Inference Based on Retrospective Ascertainment: An Analysis of the Data on Transfusion-Related AIDS

    J. D. Kalbfleisch;J. F. Lawless

  • USE OF STATINS AND INCIDENCE OF DEMENTIA AND COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT WITHOUT DEMENTIA IN A COHORT STUDY

    C. Cramer;M. N. Haan;S. Galea;K. M. Langa

  • A modified likelihood ratio test for homogeneity in finite mixture models

    Hanfeng Chen;Jiahua Chen;John D. Kalbfleisch

  • Semiparametric methods for response-selective and missing data problems in regression

    J. F. Lawless;J. D. Kalbfleisch;C. J. Wild

  • The effects of mixture distribution misspecification when fitting mixed-effects logistic models

    J. M. Neuhaus;W. W. Hauck;J. D. Kalbfleisch

  • Likelihood analysis of multi-state models for disease incidence and mortality

    J. D. Kalbfleisch;J. F. Lawless

  • Pregnancy-Onset Habitual Snoring, Gestational Hypertension, and Preeclampsia: Prospective Cohort Study

    L.M. O’Brien;A.S. Bullough;J.T. Owusu;K.A. Tremblay

  • Calculating Life Years from Transplant (LYFT): Methods for Kidney and Kidney-Pancreas Candidates

    R. A. Wolfe;Keith P. McCullough;D. E. Schaubel;John D. Kalbfleisch

  • Methods for the analysis and prediction of warranty claims

    J. D. Kalbfleisch;J. F. Lawless;J. A. Robinson

Frequent Co-Authors

Ross L. Prentice
Ross L. Prentice Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Mary N. Haan
Mary N. Haan University of California, San Francisco
Jiahua Chen
Jiahua Chen University of British Columbia
Jerald F. Lawless
Jerald F. Lawless University of Waterloo
Ronald D. Chervin
Ronald D. Chervin University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Lewis B. Morgenstern
Lewis B. Morgenstern University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
John Neuhaus
John Neuhaus University of California, San Francisco
Sandro Galea
Sandro Galea Washington University in St. Louis
Robert M. Merion
Robert M. Merion University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Kenneth M. Langa
Kenneth M. Langa University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Mathematics degree in the USA opens diverse career opportunities, often complemented by related online programs that enhance skills and employability. For those interested in finance, online masters in finance programs offer cost-effective ways to deepen financial analysis and quantitative skills while maintaining flexibility.

Professionals aiming to advance their careers quickly might explore the shortest online MBA degree programs. These fast-paced options are designed to deliver essential business knowledge efficiently, making them ideal for math graduates seeking leadership roles in industry or finance.

Marketing is another growing field where analytical skills from a math background are highly valued. The cheapest online marketing degree programs provide an accessible path to gain marketing expertise without long-term financial strain, often leading to well-paying positions.

For those interested in business administration, the best one year MBA programs combine rigorous coursework with a condensed timeline. This allows students to return to the workforce promptly while gaining critical managerial competencies that complement a mathematics foundation.

Best Scientists Citing John D. Kalbfleisch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles