World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
45
Citations
9631
World Ranking
6318
National Ranking
2281

Lisa M. Goddard publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa M. Goddard sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 129 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Lisa M. Goddard D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa M. Goddard sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lisa M. Goddard is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States and conducts research primarily in environmental science, earth and planetary sciences, and agricultural and biological sciences. Their work addresses various dimensions of climate variability, meteorological phenomena, and climate change impacts, especially as related to agriculture and atmospheric science.

The main research topics in their body of work include:

  • Climate variability and models
  • Meteorological phenomena and simulations
  • Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Tropical and extratropical cyclones research
  • Atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics
  • Plant responses to elevated CO2
  • Hydrology and drought analysis

The scientist's subfields of study emphasize global and planetary change, atmospheric science, ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics, plant science, and soil science.

Lisa M. Goddard has published articles in prominent venues within their field, including Climate Dynamics, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Geophysical Research Letters, Research Square, and Weather and Forecasting.

The researcher's recent publications include:

  • "Advances in the Application and Utility of Subseasonal-to-Seasonal Predictions," 2021, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • "Seasonal Forecast Skill of ENSO Teleconnection Maps," 2020, Weather and Forecasting
  • "Impact of El Niño on Weather and Climate Extremes," 2020, Geophysical Monograph
  • "Climate Variability and Simultaneous Breadbasket Yield Shocks as Observed in Long-Term Yield Records," 2023, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
  • "Understanding CMIP6 Biases in the Representation of the Greater Horn of Africa Long and Short Rains," 2022, Climate Dynamics

Frequent collaborators in their scientific work include Ángel G. Muñoz, Weston Anderson, Walter Baethgen, Mingfang Ting, and Yochanan Kushnir.

Best Publications

  • Decadal Prediction: Can It Be Skillful?

    Gerald A. Meehl;Lisa M. Goddard;James Murphy;Ronald J. Stouffer

  • Current Approaches to Seasonal to Interannual Climate Predictions

    Lisa M. Goddard;Simon J. Mason;Stephen E. Zebiak;Chester F. Ropelewski

  • Decadal Climate Prediction: An Update from the Trenches

    Gerald A. Meehl;Lisa Goddard;George Boer;Robert Burgman

  • Importance of the Indian Ocean for simulating rainfall anomalies over eastern and southern Africa

    Lisa M. Goddard;Nicholas E. Graham

  • Probabilistic Precipitation Anomalies Associated with ENSO

    Simon J. Mason;Lisa M. Goddard

  • A verification framework for interannual-to-decadal predictions experiments

    L. Goddard;A. Kumar;A. Solomon;D. Smith

  • The IRI Seasonal Climate Prediction System and the 1997/98 El Niño Event

    Simon J. Mason;Lisa M. Goddard;Nicholas E. Graham;Elena Yulaeva

  • Multimodel Ensembling in Seasonal Climate Forecasting at IRI

    Anthony G. Barnston;Simon J. Mason;Lisa M. Goddard;David G. Dewitt

  • Hell and High Water: Practice-Relevant Adaptation Science

    Richard H. Moss;G. Meehl;Maria Carmen Lemos;J. B. Smith

  • Evaluation of the IRI's “Net Assessment” Seasonal Climate Forecasts: 1997–2001

    Lisa M. Goddard;Anthony G. Barnston;Simon J. Mason

  • El Niño: Catastrophe or Opportunity

    Lisa M. Goddard;Maxx Dilley

  • Variability and predictability of West African droughts: a review on the role of sea surface temperature anomalies.

    Belen Rodríguez-Fonseca;Elsa Mohino;Carlos R. Mechoso;Cyril Caminade

  • British Dietetic Association evidence‐based guidelines for the dietary management of irritable bowel syndrome in adults

    Y. A. McKenzie;A. Alder;W. Anderson;A. Wills

  • DISTINGUISHING THE ROLES OF NATURAL AND ANTHROPOGENICALLY FORCED DECADAL CLIMATE VARIABILITY Implications for Prediction

    Amy Solomon;Lisa M. Goddard;Arun Kumar;James Carton

  • Improved Combination of Multiple Atmospheric GCM Ensembles for Seasonal Prediction

    Andrew W. Robertson;Upmanu Lall;Stephen E. Zebiak;Lisa M. Goddard

  • Verification of the First 11 Years of IRI’s Seasonal Climate Forecasts

    Anthony G. Barnston;Shuhua Li;Simon J. Mason;David G. Dewitt

  • Probabilistic Multimodel Regional Temperature Change Projections

    Arthur M. Greene;Lisa M. Goddard;Upmanu Lall

  • Advances in the application and utility of subseasonal-to-seasonal predictions

    Christopher J. White;Daniela I. V. Domeisen;Nachiketa Acharya;Elijah A. Adefisan

  • Dynamical Causes of the 2010/11 Texas–Northern Mexico Drought*

    Richard Seager;Lisa M. Goddard;Jennifer A. Nakamura;Naomi L. Henderson

  • On the use and misuse of climate change projections in international development

    Hannah J. Nissan;Lisa M. Goddard;Erin Coughlan de Perez;John Furlow

  • El Niño in the 1990s

    Lisa M. Goddard;Nicholas E. Graham

  • Statistical Recalibration of GCM Forecasts over Southern Africa Using Model Output Statistics

    Willem A. Landman;Lisa M. Goddard

Frequent Co-Authors

Simon J. Mason
Simon J. Mason Columbia University
Andrew W. Robertson
Andrew W. Robertson Columbia University
Yochanan Kushnir
Yochanan Kushnir Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Anthony G. Barnston
Anthony G. Barnston Columbia University
Nicholas E. Graham
Nicholas E. Graham Hydrologic Research Center
Gerald A. Meehl
Gerald A. Meehl National Center for Atmospheric Research
Stephen E. Zebiak
Stephen E. Zebiak Columbia University
Willem A. Landman
Willem A. Landman University of Pretoria
Ben P. Kirtman
Ben P. Kirtman University of Miami
Mingfang Ting
Mingfang Ting Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths that often intersect with fields like public administration, sociology, and education. For those aiming to influence environmental policy or manage community programs, pursuing one of the best online masters in public administration can be invaluable. Such degrees provide essential skills in leadership and governance crucial for environmental advocacy and sustainable development.

Understanding societal impacts on the environment is another critical aspect, where an accredited online bachelors in sociology equips students with insight into human behavior and social structures. This knowledge complements environmental science expertise, enhancing career opportunities in community planning and environmental justice.

For professionals interested in academia or educational leadership within environmental fields, exploring online edd programs no dissertation offers flexible paths to advanced credentials without the traditional dissertation barrier. Additionally, pathways like the best eds to edd programs provide seamless transitions for educators aiming to deepen their expertise and influence environmental education policies.

Combining environmental science with these complementary online degrees broadens career prospects and empowers students to tackle environmental challenges holistically.

Best Scientists Citing Lisa M. Goddard

Trending Scientists