World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
54
Citations
9978
World Ranking
4635
National Ranking
2574

Mark H. Lewis publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark H. Lewis sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 136 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mark H. Lewis D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark H. Lewis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada Academy of Science
  • 1973 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Mark H. Lewis is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on medicine and neuroscience. Within these domains, their work addresses specialized subfields such as cognitive neuroscience, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, surgery, cellular and molecular neuroscience, and psychiatry and mental health.

Lewis's research topics include:

  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Pancreatic function and diabetes

Their recent scientific publications cover a range of studies and case reports in both clinical and research contexts. Some of the notable papers include:

  • "A pediatric patient with autism spectrum disorder and epilepsy using cannabinoid extracts as complementary therapy: a case report" (2020, Journal of Medical Case Reports)
  • "Provision of Interventional Radiology Services 2023" (2023, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology)
  • "Case report: cystic artery pseudoaneurysm presenting as a massive per rectum bleed treated with percutaneous coil embolization" (2020, CVIR Endovascular)
  • "Cortico-basal ganglia white matter microstructure is linked to restricted repetitive behavior in autism spectrum disorder" (2024, Molecular Autism)
  • "Pharmacological targeting of striatal indirect pathway neurons improves subthalamic nucleus dysfunction and reduces repetitive behaviors in C58 mice" (2020, Behavioural Brain Research)

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Lewis include:

  • Anna L. Farmer
  • Bradley J. Wilkes
  • James W. Bodfish
  • Karl M. Newell
  • Marcelo Febo

Their work has appeared repeatedly in several publication venues, including:

  • Behavioural Brain Research
  • UNC Libraries
  • Molecular Autism
  • Journal of Medical Case Reports
  • CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

Mark H. Lewis's contributions to scientific fields have been recognized through awards such as:

  • Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada (2015), Academy of Science
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1973)

Best Publications

  • Varieties of repetitive behavior in autism: comparisons to mental retardation.

    James W. Bodfish;Frank J. Symons;Dawn E. Parker;Mark H. Lewis

  • Decreased static and dynamic postural control in children with autism spectrum disorders.

    Kimberly A. Fournier;Cara I. Kimberg;Krestin J. Radonovich;Mark D. Tillman

  • Repetitive behavior disorders in autism

    Mark H. Lewis;James W. Bodfish

  • Animal models of restricted repetitive behavior in autism

    Mark H. Lewis;Yoko Tanimura;Linda W. Lee;James W. Bodfish

  • The pathophysiology of restricted repetitive behavior

    Mark Lewis;Soo Jeong Kim

  • B lymphocyte antigen D8/17: a peripheral marker for childhood-onset obsessive-compulsive disorder and Tourette's syndrome?

    Tanya K. Murphy;Wayne K. Goodman;Marilyn W. Fudge;Ralph C. Williams

  • D-cycloserine does not enhance exposure-response prevention therapy in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Eric A. Storch;Lisa J. Merlo;Michael Bengtson;Tanya K. Murphy

  • Compulsions in adults with mental retardation: prevalence, phenomenology, and comorbidity with stereotypy and self-injury

    J W Bodfish;T W Crawford;S B Powell;D E Parker

  • SCH-23390: A selective D1 dopamine antagonist with potent D2 behavioral actions

    Richard B. Mailman;David W. Schulz;Mark H. Lewis;Laura Staples

  • Self-injurious behavior: Gene-brain-behavior relationships

    Stephen R. Schroeder;Mary Lou Oster-Granite;Gershon Berkson;James W. Bodfish

  • Prevention of 6-hydroxydopamine-induced rotational behavior by BDNF somatic gene transfer.

    Ronald L. Klein;Mark H. Lewis;Nicholas Muzyczka;Edwin M. Meyer

  • Environmental complexity and central nervous system development and function

    Mark H. Lewis;Mark H. Lewis

  • Markers for biogenic amines in the aged rat brain: Relationship to decline in spatial learning ability

    Michela Gallagher;Rebecca D. Burwell;Matthew H. Kodsi;Michael McKinney

  • A rodent model of spontaneous stereotypy : Initial characterization of developmental, environmental, and neurobiological factors

    Susan B Powell;Howard A Newman;Jane F Pendergast;Mark H Lewis

  • Detecting pediatric autoimmune neuropsychiatric disorders associated with streptococcus in children with obsessive-compulsive disorder and tics.

    Tanya K Murphy;Muhammad Sajid;Ohel Soto;Nathan Shapira

  • Long-Term Effects of Early Social Isolation in Macaca mulatta: Changes in Dopamine Receptor Function Following Apomorphine Challenge

    Mark H. Lewis;John P. Gluck;Alan J. Beauchamp;Michael F. Keresztury

  • Influence of cholecystokinin on central monoaminergic pathways.

    Erik Widerlöv;Erik Widerlöv;Peter W. Kalivas;Mark H. Lewis;Arthur J. Prange

  • Development of spontaneous stereotyped behavior in deer mice: effects of early and late exposure to a more complex environment.

    Susan B. Powell;Howard A. Newman;Tayloe A. McDonald;Paul Bugenhagen

  • Environmental enrichment: effects on stereotyped behavior and dendritic morphology.

    Cortney A. Turner;Mark H. Lewis;Michael A. King

  • Procedural learning and cognitive flexibility in a mouse model of restricted, repetitive behaviour

    Yoko Tanimura;Mark C. Yang;Mark H. Lewis

  • Repetitive Behavior Scale–Revised

    James W. Bodfish;Frank J. Symons;Dawn E. Parker;Mark H. Lewis

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard B. Mailman
Richard B. Mailman Pennsylvania State University
James W. Bodfish
James W. Bodfish Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Karl M. Newell
Karl M. Newell University of Georgia
Wayne K. Goodman
Wayne K. Goodman Baylor College of Medicine
David E. Nichols
David E. Nichols Purdue University West Lafayette
Michael A. King
Michael A. King University of Florida
David J.A. Evans
David J.A. Evans Durham University
Tanya K. Murphy
Tanya K. Murphy University of South Florida
Robert B. Cairns
Robert B. Cairns University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Edwin H. Cook
Edwin H. Cook University of Illinois at Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology programs is an excellent way to start or advance your career in mental health, research, counseling, or academic fields. Many universities across the USA now offer accelerated options to complete your education at your own pace. For those aiming to fast-track their studies, fastest online psychology doctorate programs in Virginia provide pathways to earn a doctoral degree more efficiently, unlocking advanced clinical and teaching positions.

If you’re interested in a master's program, you might consider the fastest online psychology master's degrees in Virginia for in-depth training suited for private practice or specialized roles. Texas offers flexibility as well, with fastest online psychology degree programs in Texas designed for undergraduate and graduate students seeking diverse career opportunities.

Students in the Pacific Northwest can explore the fastest online psychology programs in Washington, suited for a range of professions, from school psychology to industrial-organizational roles. With the growing demand for mental health professionals, these accredited online options can help you start or advance a meaningful and impactful career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Mark H. Lewis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles