World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
102
Citations
39307
World Ranking
330
National Ranking
148

Richard Seager publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Seager sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 349 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Richard Seager D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Seager sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow of American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Overview

Richard Seager is affiliated with the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and planetary sciences as well as environmental science, with a strong emphasis on global and planetary change, atmospheric science, and oceanography.

Their work is concentrated in several subfields, including:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Oceanography
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Sociology and Political Science

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Climate variability and models
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Tree-ring climate responses
  • Hydrology and Drought Analysis

Seager has contributed extensively to peer-reviewed publications, with a notable presence in the Journal of Climate, publishing 21 papers there. Other frequent publication venues include the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Climate Dynamics, Geophysical Research Letters, and npj Climate and Atmospheric Science.

The following recent papers represent some of their latest scholarly contributions:

  • Persistent Discrepancies between Observed and Modeled Trends in the Tropical Pacific Ocean, 2022, Journal of Climate
  • Megadroughts in the Common Era and the Anthropocene, 2022, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
  • On the future zonal contrasts of equatorial Pacific climate: Perspectives from Observations, Simulations, and Theories, 2022, npj Climate and Atmospheric Science
  • Violent conflict exacerbated drought-related food insecurity between 2009 and 2019 in sub-Saharan Africa, 2021, Nature Food
  • Observed humidity trends in dry regions contradict climate models, 2023, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Frequent collaborators in their research include Mingfang Ting, Jason E. Smerdon, Park Williams, Benjamin I. Cook, and Mark A. Cane. These coauthors appear over multiple joint publications, reflecting ongoing research partnerships.

Seager was recognized as a Fellow of the American Geophysical Union (AGU) in 2018.

Best Publications

  • Model Projections of an Imminent Transition to a More Arid Climate in Southwestern North America

    Richard Seager;Mingfang Ting;Isaac Held;Isaac Held;Yochanan Kushnir

  • Temperature as a potent driver of regional forest drought stress and tree mortality

    A. Park Williams;Craig D. Allen;Alison K. Macalady;Daniel Griffin

  • Climate change in the Fertile Crescent and implications of the recent Syrian drought.

    Colin P. Kelley;Shahrzad Mohtadi;Mark A. Cane;Richard Seager

  • Global warming and 21st century drying

    Benjamin I. Cook;Jason E. Smerdon;Richard Seager;Sloan John Coats

  • North American drought: Reconstructions, causes, and consequences

    Edward R. Cook;Richard Seager;Mark A. Cane;David W. Stahle

  • Thermodynamic and Dynamic Mechanisms for Large-Scale Changes in the Hydrological Cycle in Response to Global Warming*

    Richard Seager;Naomi H. Naik;Gabriel A. Vecchi

  • An Ocean Dynamical Thermostat

    Amy C. Clement;Richard Seager;Mark A. Cane;Stephen E. Zebiak

  • Twentieth-century sea surface temperature trends

    Mark A. Cane;Amy C. Clement;Alexey Kaplan;Yochanan Kushnir

  • Old World megadroughts and pluvials during the Common Era

    Edward R. Cook;Richard Seager;Yochanan Kushnir;Keith R. Briffa

  • Contribution of anthropogenic warming to California drought during 2012–2014

    A. Park Williams;Richard Seager;John T. Abatzoglou;Benjamin I. Cook;Benjamin I. Cook

  • Forced and Internal Twentieth-Century SST Trends in the North Atlantic*

    Mingfang Ting;Yochanan Kushnir;Richard Seager;Cuihua Li

  • Greenhouse warming and the 21st century hydroclimate of southwestern North America.

    Richard Seager;Gabriel Andres Vecchi

  • Orbital controls on the El Niño/Southern Oscillation and the tropical climate

    A. C. Clement;A. C. Clement;R. Seager;M. A. Cane

  • Megadroughts in North America: placing IPCC projections of hydroclimatic change in a long-term palaeoclimate context

    Edward R. Cook;Richard Seager;Richard R. Heim;Russell S. Vose

  • Suppression of El Niño during the Mid‐Holocene by changes in the Earth's orbit

    Amy C. Clement;Richard Seager;Mark A. Cane

  • Causes and Predictability of the 2012 Great Plains Drought

    Martin P. Hoerling;J. Eischeid;Arun Kumar;R. Leung

  • Strengthening tropical Pacific zonal sea surface temperature gradient consistent with rising greenhouse gases

    Richard Seager;Mark A. Cane;Naomi L. Henderson;Dong Eun Lee

  • Mechanisms of Hemispherically Symmetric Climate Variability

    Richard Seager;Nili Harnik;Yochanan Kushnir;Walter A. Robinson

  • Modeling of Tropical Forcing of Persistent Droughts and Pluvials over Western North America: 1856–2000*

    Richard Seager;Yochanan Kushnir;Celine Herweijer;Naomi H. Naik

  • Amplification of the North American “Dust Bowl” drought through human-induced land degradation

    Benjamin I. Cook;Ronald L. Miller;Richard Seager

  • Model Projections of an Imminent Transition to a More Arid Climate in

    Richard Seager;Mingfang Ting;Isaac Held;Yochanan Kushnir

  • Contribution of anthropogenic warming to California drought during 2012-2015

    P. Williams;R. Seager;J. T. Abatzoglou;B. Cook

Frequent Co-Authors

Benjamin I. Cook
Benjamin I. Cook Goddard Institute for Space Studies
Mark A. Cane
Mark A. Cane Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Yochanan Kushnir
Yochanan Kushnir Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Jason E. Smerdon
Jason E. Smerdon Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Mingfang Ting
Mingfang Ting Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Edward R. Cook
Edward R. Cook Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Naomi Naik
Naomi Naik Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
A. Park Williams
A. Park Williams Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Amy C. Clement
Amy C. Clement University of Miami
Justin S. Mankin
Justin S. Mankin Dartmouth College

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those passionate about environmental sciences, pursuing additional online degrees can broaden career opportunities. Many professionals start with a bachelor's degree and advance through specialized programs. For educators or researchers, an online eds to edd bridge program offers a streamlined path to doctoral credentials, enhancing leadership roles in academic or policy settings.

In fields intersecting with social and environmental issues, social work doctoral degrees are valuable. Some of the best fully funded dsw programs combine affordability with quality, making advanced study accessible to many.

If you’re exploring flexible and cost-effective options, an accredited affordable online general studies degree can provide a broad educational foundation. This approach helps students tailor coursework toward environmental topics while balancing other life commitments.

For those new to higher education or seeking a simpler entry route into college, pursuing one of the easy bachelor's degree programs can build confidence and essential skills applicable to environmental sciences before advancing further.

Best Scientists Citing Richard Seager

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles