World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Justin S. Mankin

Justin S. Mankin

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
34
Citations
6980
World Ranking
9392
National Ranking
3367

Justin S. Mankin publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Justin S. Mankin sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 90 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Justin S. Mankin D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Justin S. Mankin sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Climate change
  • Global warming
  • Agriculture

Climate change, Climatology, Global warming, Climate model and Proxy are his primary areas of study. The various areas that Justin S. Mankin examines in his Climate change study include Atmospheric circulation and Surface runoff. His Surface runoff study incorporates themes from Snow and Water resource management.

His research integrates issues of Radiative forcing, Forcing and Greenhouse gas in his study of Climate model. His work deals with themes such as Subtropics, Mediterranean climate, Snowpack and Paleoclimatology, which intersect with Proxy. His Greenhouse effect research includes elements of Climate risk and Meteorology, Precipitation, Megadrought.

His most cited work include:

  • Quantifying the influence of global warming on unprecedented extreme climate events (194 citations)
  • Will climate change exacerbate water stress in Central Asia (120 citations)
  • A Review of Recent Advances in Research on Extreme Heat Events (111 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Justin S. Mankin focuses on Climatology, Climate change, Precipitation, Atmospheric sciences and Surface runoff. His Climatology research integrates issues from Extreme events, Global change and Megadrought. His Climate model, Extreme heat, Global warming and Paleoclimatology study, which is part of a larger body of work in Climate change, is frequently linked to High resolution, bridging the gap between disciplines.

His Precipitation study incorporates themes from Hydrology, Evapotranspiration, Water content and Forcing. His Atmospheric sciences research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Geopotential and Geopotential height. His work in Surface runoff tackles topics such as Water resource management which are related to areas like Snowmelt, Irrigation and Snow.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Climatology (88.64%)
  • Climate change (56.82%)
  • Precipitation (68.18%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2019-2021)?

  • Climatology (88.64%)
  • Internal variability (9.09%)
  • Precipitation (68.18%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Climatology, Internal variability, Precipitation, Atmospheric sciences and Climate change. His research integrates issues of Haze and Air quality index in his study of Climatology. His Precipitation study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Oceanography and Surface runoff.

Justin S. Mankin interconnects Agriculture, Water resource management, Irrigation and Water resources in the investigation of issues within Surface runoff. The various areas that Justin S. Mankin examines in his Atmospheric sciences study include Geopotential, East Asian Monsoon, Land use, land-use change and forestry and Growing season. His studies in Climate change integrate themes in fields like Evapotranspiration and Vegetation.

Between 2019 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Twenty‐First Century Drought Projections in the CMIP6 Forcing Scenarios (39 citations)
  • Twenty‐First Century Drought Projections in the CMIP6 Forcing Scenarios (39 citations)
  • Agricultural risks from changing snowmelt (21 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Climate change
  • Global warming
  • Agriculture

Justin S. Mankin spends much of his time researching Climatology, Twenty-First Century, Forcing, Farm water and Irrigation. Farm water combines with fields such as Water resource management, Agriculture, Climate change, Precipitation and Surface runoff in his research. His Irrigation research incorporates elements of Snowmelt and Water resources.

Best Publications

  • Twenty-First Century Drought Projections in the CMIP6 Forcing Scenarios

    B. I. Cook;B. I. Cook;J. S. Mankin;J. S. Mankin;K. Marvel;K. Marvel;A. P. Williams

  • Quantifying the influence of global warming on unprecedented extreme climate events

    Noah S. Diffenbaugh;Deepti Singh;Deepti Singh;Justin S. Mankin;Daniel E. Horton;Daniel E. Horton

  • Climate Change and Drought: From Past to Future

    Benjamin I. Cook;Benjamin I. Cook;Justin S. Mankin;Justin S. Mankin;Kevin J. Anchukaitis

  • A Review of Recent Advances in Research on Extreme Heat Events

    Radley M. Horton;Radley M. Horton;Justin S. Mankin;Justin S. Mankin;Corey Lesk;Ethan Coffel

  • Agricultural risks from changing snowmelt

    Yue Qin;Yue Qin;John T. Abatzoglou;John T. Abatzoglou;Stefan Siebert;Laurie S. Huning

  • The potential for snow to supply human water demand in the present and future

    Justin S. Mankin;Daniel Viviroli;Deepti Singh;Deepti Singh;Arjen Ysbert Hoekstra

  • Will climate change exacerbate water stress in Central Asia

    Tobias Siegfried;Thomas Bernauer;Renaud Guiennet;Scott Sellars

  • Relative impacts of mitigation, temperature, and precipitation on 21st-century megadrought risk in the American Southwest.

    Toby R. Ault;Justin S. Mankin;Benjamin I. Cook;Jason E. Smerdon

  • Mid-Latitude Freshwater Availability Reduced by Projected Vegetation Responses to Climate Change

    Justin S. Mankin;Justin S. Mankin;Richard Seager;Jason E. Smerdon;Benjamin I. Cook;Benjamin I. Cook

  • Soil Moisture Stress as a Major Driver of Carbon Cycle Uncertainty

    A. T. Trugman;D. Medvigy;J. S. Mankin;J. S. Mankin;W. R. L. Anderegg

  • Megadroughts in the Common Era and the Anthropocene

    Unknown

  • Growing impact of wildfire on western US water supply

    Unknown

  • Comparing proxy and model estimates of hydroclimate variability and change over the Common Era

    Jason E. Smerdon;Jurg Luterbacher;Steven J. Phipps;Kevin J. Anchukaitis

  • The potential to reduce uncertainty in regional runoff projections from climate models

    Flavio Lehner;Flavio Lehner;Andrew W. Wood;Julie A. Vano;David M. Lawrence

  • Influence of temperature and precipitation variability on near-term snow trends

    Justin S. Mankin;Noah S. Diffenbaugh

  • Future Hot and Dry Years Worsen Nile Basin Water Scarcity Despite Projected Precipitation Increases

    Ethan D. Coffel;Bruce Keith;Corey Lesk;Corey Lesk;Radley M. Horton;Radley M. Horton

  • The Value of Initial Condition Large Ensembles to Robust Adaptation Decision-Making

    Justin S. Mankin;Justin S. Mankin;Flavio Lehner;Flavio Lehner;Sloan Coats;Sloan Coats;Karen A. McKinnon

  • Unprecedented climate events: Historical changes, aspirational targets, and national commitments

    Noah S. Diffenbaugh;Deepti Singh;Deepti Singh;Justin S. Mankin;Justin S. Mankin;Justin S. Mankin

  • The Curious Case of Projected Twenty-First-Century Drying but Greening in the American West

    Justin S. Mankin;Jason E. Smerdon;Benjamin I. Cook;A. Park Williams

  • Amplification of heat extremes by plant CO2 physiological forcing.

    Christopher B. Skinner;Christopher J. Poulsen;Justin S. Mankin;Justin S. Mankin;Justin S. Mankin

  • Recent amplification of the North American winter temperature dipole

    Deepti Singh;Deepti Singh;Daniel L. Swain;Justin S. Mankin;Justin S. Mankin;Daniel E. Horton;Daniel E. Horton

  • The 2016 Southeastern U.S. Drought: An Extreme Departure From Centennial Wetting and Cooling

    A. Park Williams;Benjamin I. Cook;Jason E. Smerdon;Daniel Alexander Bishop;Daniel Alexander Bishop

Frequent Co-Authors

Benjamin I. Cook
Benjamin I. Cook Goddard Institute for Space Studies
Jason E. Smerdon
Jason E. Smerdon Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Richard Seager
Richard Seager Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Noah S. Diffenbaugh
Noah S. Diffenbaugh Stanford University
A. Park Williams
A. Park Williams Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Radley M. Horton
Radley M. Horton Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Flavio Lehner
Flavio Lehner Cornell University
Toby R. Ault
Toby R. Ault Cornell University
Larissa Nazarenko
Larissa Nazarenko Goddard Institute for Space Studies
Peter Bauer-Gottwein
Peter Bauer-Gottwein Technical University of Denmark

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students passionate about Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career prospects. Many universities offer flexible options, such as the online eds to edd bridge program, which allows educators to advance their qualifications while focusing on environmental education or policy.

For those interested in social aspects of environmental work, programs like the cheapest dsw program provide affordable pathways into leadership roles addressing community well-being and sustainability.

Prospective students seeking a broader foundation might consider some of the most affordable online general studies degree programs. These can be tailored with environmental coursework to create a versatile degree suited for various industries.

If flexibility and ease are priorities, exploring the easiest bachelors degree options can help students enter the workforce faster while gaining essential knowledge in environmental science and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Justin S. Mankin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles