World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
42
Citations
16313
World Ranking
7243
National Ranking
2576

Larissa Nazarenko publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Larissa Nazarenko sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 89 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Larissa Nazarenko D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Larissa Nazarenko sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Larissa Nazarenko is affiliated with the Goddard Institute for Space Studies in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within environmental and earth sciences, with a focus on climate and atmospheric dynamics.

Their work encompasses the following main fields of study:

  • Environmental Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences

Within these fields, their subfields of study include:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Oceanography
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics

The key topics Larissa Nazarenko has focused on through their publications are:

  • Climate variability and models
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Geophysics and Gravity Measurements

They have contributed to numerous scientific papers, including recent notable works such as:

  • "GISS-E2.1: Configurations and Climatology", 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • "Effective radiative forcing and adjustments in CMIP6 models", 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • "Global warming in the pipeline", 2023, Oxford Open Climate Change
  • "Constraining human contributions to observed warming since the pre-industrial period", 2021, Nature Climate Change
  • "Historical (1850-2014) Aerosol Evolution and Role on Climate Forcing Using the GISS ModelE2.1 Contribution to CMIP6", 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Larissa Nazarenko include:

  • Gavin A. Schmidt
  • Clara Orbe
  • Maxwell Kelley
  • David Rind
  • Gary L. Russell

Their publications appear regularly in a range of scientific journals. The top venues for their work are:

  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Journal of Climate
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

Best Publications

  • Climate Effects of Black Carbon Aerosols in China and India

    Surabi Menon;Surabi Menon;James Hansen;Larissa Nazarenko;Larissa Nazarenko;Yunfeng Luo

  • Soot climate forcing via snow and ice albedos

    James Hansen;Larissa Nazarenko

  • Efficacy of climate forcings

    J. Hansen;J. Hansen;M. Sato;R. Ruedy;L. Nazarenko

  • Earth's Energy Imbalance: Confirmation and Implications

    James Hansen;Larissa Nazarenko;Reto Ruedy;Makiko Sato

  • Present-Day Atmospheric Simulations Using GISS ModelE: Comparison to In Situ, Satellite, and Reanalysis Data

    Gavin A. Schmidt;Reto Ruedy;James E. Hansen;Igor Aleinov

  • Configuration and Assessment of the GISS ModelE2 Contributions to the CMIP5 Archive

    Gavin A. Schmidt;Max Kelley;Larissa Nazarenko;Reto Ruedy

  • GISS-E2.1: Configurations and Climatology.

    Maxwell Kelley;Gavin A. Schmidt;Larissa S. Nazarenko;Larissa S. Nazarenko;Susanne E. Bauer

  • Volcanic contribution to decadal changes in tropospheric temperature

    Benjamin D. Santer;Céline Bonfils;Jeffrey F. Painter;Mark D. Zelinka

  • Dangerous human-made interference with climate: a GISS modelE study

    J. Hansen;J. Hansen;M. Sato;R. Ruedy;P. Kharecha

  • Climate forcings in Goddard Institute for Space Studies SI2000 simulations

    J. Hansen;M. Sato;M. Sato;L. Nazarenko;L. Nazarenko;R. Ruedy

  • Evaluation of cloud and water vapor simulations in CMIP5 climate models using NASA “A-Train” satellite observations

    Jonathan H. Jiang;Hui Su;Chengxing Zhai;Vincent S. Perun

  • Effective radiative forcing and adjustments in CMIP6 models

    Christopher J. Smith;Christopher J. Smith;Ryan J. Kramer;Ryan J. Kramer;Gunnar Myhre;Kari Alterskjær

  • Global warming in the pipeline

    Unknown

  • Climate simulations for 1880–2003 with GISS modelE

    J. Hansen;J. Hansen;M. Sato;R. Ruedy;P. Kharecha

  • Constraining human contributions to observed warming since the pre-industrial period

    Nathan P. Gillett;Megan Kirchmeier-Young;Aurélien Ribes;Hideo Shiogama

  • Historical (1850–2014) Aerosol Evolution and Role on Climate Forcing Using the GISS ModelE2.1 Contribution to CMIP6

    Susanne E. Bauer;Kostas Tsigaridis;Kostas Tsigaridis;Greg Faluvegi;Greg Faluvegi;Maxwell Kelley

  • The Tropical Subseasonal Variability Simulated in the NASA GISS General Circulation Model

    Daehyun Kim;Adam H. Sobel;Adam H. Sobel;Anthony D. Del Genio;Yonghua Chen;Yonghua Chen

  • Interactive ozone and methane chemistry in GISS-E2 historical and future climate simulations

    D. T. Shindell;O. Pechony;A. Voulgarakis;A. Voulgarakis;G. Faluvegi

  • CMIP5 historical simulations (1850–2012) with GISS ModelE2

    Ron L. Miller;Ron L. Miller;Gavin A. Schmidt;Larissa S. Nazarenko;Nick Tausnev

  • Future climate change under RCP emission scenarios with GISS ModelE2

    L. Nazarenko;G. A. Schmidt;R. L. Miller;N. Tausnev

  • CMIP6 Historical Simulations (1850–2014) With GISS‐E2.1

    Ron L. Miller;Ron L. Miller;Gavin A. Schmidt;Larissa S. Nazarenko;Larissa S. Nazarenko;Susanne E. Bauer

  • Irrigation as an historical climate forcing

    Benjamin I. Cook;Sonali P. Shukla;Michael J. Puma;Larissa S. Nazarenko

Frequent Co-Authors

Gavin A. Schmidt
Gavin A. Schmidt Goddard Institute for Space Studies
Drew T. Shindell
Drew T. Shindell Duke University
Ron L. Miller
Ron L. Miller Goddard Institute for Space Studies
David Rind
David Rind Goddard Institute for Space Studies
James Hansen
James Hansen Columbia University
Anastasia Romanou
Anastasia Romanou Goddard Institute for Space Studies
Reto Ruedy
Reto Ruedy Goddard Institute for Space Studies
Susanne E. Bauer
Susanne E. Bauer Goddard Institute for Space Studies
Gary L. Russell
Gary L. Russell Goddard Institute for Space Studies
Surabi Menon
Surabi Menon Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many professionals seek advanced credentials, and programs like edd no dissertation offer flexible doctoral options without the traditional dissertation, ideal for working students.

Additionally, educators aiming to progress can benefit from eds to edd bridge programs online. These pathways provide streamlined transitions from a master's to a doctorate, expanding leadership roles in environmental education and policy.

For those interested in social work within environmental contexts, affordable degrees such as dsw online programs combine sustainability with community engagement, preparing graduates for impactful careers in social and environmental justice.

Lastly, the variety of most affordable online general studies degree programs provides a broad foundation, allowing students to tailor their studies toward environmental issues while balancing cost and flexibility. These degree options create multiple pathways toward meaningful environmental careers.

Best Scientists Citing Larissa Nazarenko

Trending Scientists