World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
51
Citations
9756
World Ranking
5373
National Ranking
2460

Mark Moir publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Moir sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 130 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Mark Moir D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Moir sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Moir is affiliated with Oracle (US) in the United States and has contributed to the field of computer science through research focused primarily on distributed systems, fault tolerance, and formal verification.

Their recent papers encompass work published between 2021 and 2022. Representative publications include:

  • "Formal Verification of Authenticated, Append-Only Skip Lists in Agda: Extended Version" (2021) published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Towards Formal Verification of HotStuff-based Byzantine Fault Tolerant Consensus in Agda: Extended Version" (2022) published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "An approach to translating Haskell programs to Agda and reasoning about them" (2022) published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Wait-free algorithms for fast, long-lived renaming" (2021) published in UNC Libraries

The research venues associated with their publications predominantly include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • UNC Libraries

Their main field of study is computer science, with significant focus on several subfields, such as:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Information Systems
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Sociology and Political Science

The topics frequently addressed in their work cover a range of themes within computer science and verification, including:

  • Distributed systems and fault tolerance
  • Security and Verification in Computing
  • Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
  • Cloud Data Security Solutions
  • Logic, programming, and type systems
  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security

Mark Moir collaborates extensively with several frequent coauthors, which include:

  • Harold Carr
  • Victor Cacciari Miraldo
  • Lisandra Silva
  • Christa Jenkins
  • Guy L. Steele

Best Publications

  • Software transactional memory for dynamic-sized data structures

    Maurice Herlihy;Victor Luchangco;Mark Moir;William N. Scherer

  • Obstruction-free synchronization: double-ended queues as an example

    M. Herlihy;V. Luchangco;M. Moir

  • Hybrid transactional memory

    Peter Damron;Alexandra Fedorova;Yossi Lev;Victor Luchangco

  • Early experience with a commercial hardware transactional memory implementation

    Dave Dice;Yossi Lev;Mark Moir;Daniel Nussbaum

  • A flexible framework for implementing software transactional memory

    Maurice Herlihy;Victor Luchangco;Mark Moir

  • Space-and time-adaptive nonblocking algorithms

    Mark S. Moir;Victor M. Luchangco;Maurice Herlihy

  • Practical implementations of non-blocking synchronization primitives

    Mark Moir

  • The repeat offender problem: a mechanism for supporting dynamic-sized lock-free data structures

    Maurice Herlihy;Victor Luchangco;Mark Moir

  • Hybrid NOrec: a case study in the effectiveness of best effort hardware transactional memory

    Luke Dalessandro;François Carouge;Sean White;Yossi Lev

  • Lock-free reference counting

    David L. Detlefs;Paul A. Martin;Mark Moir;Guy L. Steele

  • Using elimination to implement scalable and lock-free FIFO queues

    Mark Moir;Daniel Nussbaum;Ori Shalev;Nir Shavit

  • PhTM: Phased Transactional Memory

    Dan Nussbaum;Yosef Lev;Mark Moir

  • Transparent Support for Wait-Free Transactions

    Mark Moir

  • Wait-free algorithms for fast, long-lived renaming

    Mark Moir;James H. Anderson

  • Hybrid software/hardware transactional memory

    Mark S. Moir

  • Universal constructions for multi-object operations

    James H. Anderson;Mark Moir

  • Nonblocking memory management support for dynamic-sized data structures

    Maurice Herlihy;Victor Luchangco;Paul Martin;Mark Moir

  • Formal verification of a practical lock-free queue algorithm

    Simon Doherty;Lindsay Groves;Victor Luchangco;Mark Moir

  • Pfair scheduling of fixed and migrating periodic tasks on multiple resources

    M. Moir;S. Ramamurthy

  • SNZI: scalable NonZero indicators

    Faith Ellen;Yossi Lev;Victor Luchangco;Mark Moir

  • A Lazy Concurrent List-Based Set Algorithm

    Steve Heller;Maurice Herlihy;Victor Luchangco;Mark Moir

Frequent Co-Authors

Victor Luchangco
Victor Luchangco Algorand Foundation
Maurice Herlihy
Maurice Herlihy Brown University
Guy L. Steele
Guy L. Steele Oracle (United States)
Juan A. Garay
Juan A. Garay Texas A&M University
Tim Harris
Tim Harris Oracle (United States)
Marc Tremblay
Marc Tremblay Université Laval
Jan Vitek
Jan Vitek Northeastern University
Kevin Jeffay
Kevin Jeffay University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of Computer Science offers a wide range of flexible online study options designed to meet diverse student needs. From career starters to those seeking advancement, considering online programs can unlock unique pathways.

For students beginning their journey or looking for a cost-effective option, pursuing an online associate's degree in computer science can serve as a strong foundation. These programs are practical for working adults and can lead directly to entry-level IT roles or pave the way for further study.

If affordability is a key concern, there are cheap online college classes available to help students manage costs without sacrificing quality. Many reputable institutions also support students with lower academic achievements by offering opportunities at online colleges that accept 2.0 gpa.

For professionals aiming to specialize or move into higher-paying tech roles, exploring the most worthwhile masters degrees can be a strategic choice. These advanced degrees often open doors to leadership or advanced technical positions across industries.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Moir

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles