World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
8125
World Ranking
10066
National Ranking
4246

Maged M. Michael publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maged M. Michael sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 132 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Maged M. Michael D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maged M. Michael sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - ACM Distinguished Member
  • 2011 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Maged M. Michael is affiliated with Facebook, United States, where they contribute to research and development within the organization. Their recognized contributions to the field have earned them memberships in the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), including the ACM Senior Member in 2011 and the ACM Distinguished Member in 2012.

Their academic record does not list recent papers, published books, frequent co-authors, or specific publication venues. Information about the specific fields of study, subfields, and main research topics related to their work is not publicly detailed.

The honors received by Maged M. Michael reflect their involvement and standing within the computing and information technology community, as recognized by ACM.

Best Publications

  • Simple, fast, and practical non-blocking and blocking concurrent queue algorithms

    Maged M. Michael;Michael L. Scott

  • Hazard pointers: safe memory reclamation for lock-free objects

    M.M. Michael

  • High performance dynamic lock-free hash tables and list-based sets

    Maged M. Michael

  • Software transactional memory: why is it only a research toy?

    Calin Cascaval;Colin Blundell;Maged Michael;Harold W. Cain

  • Scalable lock-free dynamic memory allocation

    Maged M. Michael

  • Nonblocking Algorithms and Preemption-Safe Locking on Multiprogrammed Shared Memory Multiprocessors

    Maged M. Michael;Michael L. Scott

  • Scale-up x Scale-out: A Case Study using Nutch/Lucene

    M. Michael;J.E. Moreira;D. Shiloach;R.W. Wisniewski

  • Evaluation of Blue Gene/Q hardware support for transactional memories

    Amy Wang;Matthew Gaudet;Peng Wu;Jose Nelson Amaral

  • Safe memory reclamation for dynamic lock-free objects using atomic reads and writes

    Maged M. Michael

  • Transactional Conflict Resolution Based on Locality

    Harold W. Cain;Gheorghe C. Cascaval;Maged M. Michael

  • RingSTM: scalable transactions with a single atomic instruction

    Michael F. Spear;Maged M. Michael;Christoph von Praun

  • Robust architectural support for transactional memory in the power architecture

    Harold W. Cain;Maged M. Michael;Brad Frey;Cathy May

  • Laws of order: expensive synchronization in concurrent algorithms cannot be eliminated

    Hagit Attiya;Rachid Guerraoui;Danny Hendler;Petr Kuznetsov

  • Idempotent work stealing

    Maged M. Michael;Martin T. Vechev;Vijay A. Saraswat

  • The Augmint multiprocessor simulation toolkit for Intel x86 architectures

    A.-T. Nguyen;M. Michael;A. Sharma;J. Torrellas

  • Correction of a Memory Management Method for Lock-Free Data Structures

    Maged M. Michael;Michael L. Scott

  • Transactional Memory System Supporting Unbroken Suspended Execution

    Harold W. Cain;Bradly G. Frey;Benjamin Herrenschmidt;Hung Q. Le

  • Quantitative comparison of hardware transactional memory for Blue Gene/Q, zEnterprise EC12, Intel Core, and POWER8

    Takuya Nakaike;Rei Odaira;Matthew Gaudet;Maged M. Michael

  • A theory of memory models

    Vijay A. Saraswat;Radha Jagadeesan;Maged Michael;Christoph von Praun

  • An Efficient Algorithm for Concurrent Priority Queue Heaps

    Galen C. Hunt;Maged M. Michael;Srinivasan Parthasarathy;Michael L. Scott

  • Software Transactional Memory: Why Is It Only a Research Toy?: The promise of STM may likely be undermined by its overheads and workload applicabilities.

    Calin Cascaval;Colin Blundell;Maged Michael;Harold W. Cain

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Karl Gschwind
Michael Karl Gschwind IBM (United States)
Valentina Salapura
Valentina Salapura Google (United States)
Michael L. Scott
Michael L. Scott University of Rochester
Paul E. McKenney
Paul E. McKenney Facebook (United States)
José E. Moreira
José E. Moreira IBM (United States)
Galen C. Hunt
Galen C. Hunt Microsoft (United States)
Vijay Saraswat
Vijay Saraswat Goldman Sachs Research
Jonathan Walpole
Jonathan Walpole Portland State University
Calin Cascaval
Calin Cascaval Google (United States)
Martin Vechev
Martin Vechev ETH Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online study options in the U.S. opens diverse opportunities for aspiring computer science students. Many seek cheap online colleges to manage costs while receiving a quality education. These accredited programs help reduce student debt and make a degree more accessible.

Students concerned about their academic history can consider a college with low gpa entry requirements. These institutions offer alternative pathways, giving more learners the chance to start or advance their computer science studies.

If you’re interested in environmental technology or sustainability, a background in computer science pairs well with further study. Explore what you can achieve with cross-disciplinary education by reading about what can you get with an environmental science degree.

For those aiming to enter the workforce quickly, look into programs like a 2-year computer science degree online. Accelerated degrees help students gain in-demand technical skills in less time, improving job prospects across various industries.

Best Scientists Citing Maged M. Michael

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles