World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
51
Citations
12001
World Ranking
5287
National Ranking
2435

Galen C. Hunt publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Galen C. Hunt sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 134 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Galen C. Hunt D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Galen C. Hunt sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2007 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Galen C. Hunt is currently affiliated with Microsoft in the United States. Their professional activities are primarily connected to this institution, reflecting an involvement in research or development aligned with Microsoft's scope within the United States.

Among the distinctions awarded to this scientist, they were named an ACM Senior Member in 2007. This recognition is indicative of a professional peer acknowledgment within the Association for Computing Machinery.

No detailed information is available regarding recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, main fields or subfields of study, or main research topics for Galen C. Hunt. Consequently, no further specifics on research contributions or collaborative networks can be provided at this time.

Best Publications

  • Shielding Applications from an Untrusted Cloud with Haven

    Andrew Baumann;Marcus Peinado;Galen Hunt

  • Detours: binary interception of Win32 functions

    Galen Hunt;Doug Brubacher

  • Architecture for distributed computing system and automated design, deployment, and management of distributed applications

    Galen C. Hunt;Bassam Tabbara;Kevin Grealish;Geoffrey Outhred

  • Shielding applications from an untrusted cloud with Haven

    Andrew Baumann;Marcus Peinado;Galen Hunt

  • Dynamic classification of sections of software

    Galen C. Hunt

  • Singularity: rethinking the software stack

    Galen C. Hunt;James R. Larus

  • Language support for fast and reliable message-based communication in singularity OS

    Manuel Fähndrich;Mark Aiken;Chris Hawblitzel;Orion Hodson

  • Model-based provisioning of test environments

    Anders B. Vinberg;Robert M. Fries;Kevin Grealish;Galen C. Hunt

  • The Coign automatic distributed partitioning system

    Galen C. Hunt;Michael L. Scott

  • Helios: heterogeneous multiprocessing with satellite kernels

    Edmund B. Nightingale;Orion Hodson;Ross McIlroy;Chris Hawblitzel

  • Rethinking the library OS from the top down

    Donald E. Porter;Silas Boyd-Wickizer;Jon Howell;Reuben Olinsky

  • Debugging in the (very) large: ten years of implementation and experience

    Kirk Glerum;Kinshuman Kinshumann;Steve Greenberg;Gabriel Aul

  • Heavyweight and lightweight instrumentation

    Galen C. Hunt

  • Cashmere-2L: software coherent shared memory on a clustered remote-write network

    Robert Stets;Sandhya Dwarkadas;Nikolaos Hardavellas;Galen Hunt

  • An Overview of the Singularity Project

    Galen Hunt;James Larus;Martín Abadi;Mark Aiken

  • System and method for designing a logical model of a distributed computer system and deploying physical resources according to the logical model

    Galen C. Hunt;Aamer Hydrie;Robert V. Welland;Bassam Tabbara

  • Tools and techniques for instrumenting interfaces of units of a software program

    Galen C. Hunt

  • Reversible load-time dynamic linking

    Galen C. Hunt

  • System and method for distributed management of shared computers

    Galen C. Hunt;Aamer Hydrie;Steven P. Levi;David S. Stutz

  • Summarized application profiling and quick network profiling

    Galen C. Hunt

Frequent Co-Authors

James R. Larus
James R. Larus École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Michael L. Scott
Michael L. Scott University of Rochester
Manuel Fähndrich
Manuel Fähndrich Google (United States)
Martín Abadi
Martín Abadi Google (United States)
Marcus Peinado
Marcus Peinado Microsoft (United States)
Sandhya Dwarkadas
Sandhya Dwarkadas University of Rochester
Alexander G. Gounares
Alexander G. Gounares Microsoft (United States)
Paul Barham
Paul Barham Google (United States)
Yi-Min Wang
Yi-Min Wang Microsoft (United States)
Robert M. Fries
Robert M. Fries Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education opens up flexible options for students interested in computer science and related fields. Today, many institutions offer cutting-edge programs designed for a variety of academic backgrounds and budgets.

Affordability is a major concern for students. Choosing the cheapest online college can significantly reduce your educational expenses while still providing a valuable degree. For those with a less competitive GPA, there are excellent online graduate programs that accept 2.0 gpa, making advanced study more accessible to a wider audience.

Accelerated learning paths are also available. Enrolling in the online computer science degree can help you complete your studies faster and enter the workforce sooner.

Computer science isn't the only field with strong career potential. Many students also consider paths in sustainability and the environment. Have a look at the diverse jobs for environmental science majors to see how your interests can shape your professional future.

Best Scientists Citing Galen C. Hunt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles