World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
47
Citations
8838
World Ranking
6500
National Ranking
128

George Candea publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George Candea sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 119 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

George Candea D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George Candea sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

George Candea is affiliated with École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne in Switzerland. Their research primarily focuses on computer science, with specific attention to computer networks and communications.

The scientist's work spans several subfields and topics, including:

  • Interconnection Networks and Systems
  • Distributed systems and fault tolerance
  • Software-Defined Networks and 5G

Recent scholarly output from George Candea includes the paper titled "Productive Development of Scalable Network Functions with NFork", published in 2023 through arXiv (Cornell University).

Frequent collaborators associated with George Candea include:

  • Lei Yan
  • Yueyang Pan
  • Diyu Zhou
  • Sanidhya Kashyap

The publication venue linked to their recent work is arXiv (Cornell University), which also reflects the focus on advancing research in scalable network functionalities and distributed systems.

Best Publications

  • S2E: a platform for in-vivo multi-path analysis of software systems

    Vitaly Chipounov;Volodymyr Kuznetsov;George Candea

  • Recovery Oriented Computing (ROC): Motivation, Definition, Techniques, and Case Studies

    David Patterson;Aaron Brown;Pete Broadwell;George Candea

  • Microreboot — A technique for cheap recovery

    George Candea;Shinichi Kawamoto;Yuichi Fujiki;Greg Friedman

  • Code-pointer integrity

    Volodymyr Kuznetsov;László Szekeres;Mathias Payer;George Candea

  • Parallel symbolic execution for automated real-world software testing

    Stefan Bucur;Vlad Ureche;Cristian Zamfir;George Candea

  • Efficient state merging in symbolic execution

    Volodymyr Kuznetsov;Johannes Kinder;Stefan Bucur;George Candea

  • Execution synthesis: a technique for automated software debugging

    Cristian Zamfir;George Candea

  • Cloud9: a software testing service

    Liviu Ciortea;Cristian Zamfir;Stefan Bucur;Vitaly Chipounov

  • The S2E Platform: Design, Implementation, and Applications

    Vitaly Chipounov;Volodymyr Kuznetsov;George Candea

  • Recursive restartability: turning the reboot sledgehammer into a scalpel

    G. Candea;A. Fox

  • Crash-only software

    George Candea;Armando Fox

  • Automated software testing as a service

    George Candea;Stefan Bucur;Cristian Zamfir

  • Recovery-oriented computing: building multitier dependability

    G. Candea;A.B. Brown;A. Fox;D. Patterson

  • Deadlock immunity: enabling systems to defend against deadlocks

    Horatiu Jula;Daniel Tralamazza;Cristian Zamfir;George Candea

  • Middleware-based database replication: the gaps between theory and practice

    Emmanuel Cecchet;George Candea;Anastasia Ailamaki

  • Data races vs. data race bugs: telling the difference with portend

    Baris Kasikci;Cristian Zamfir;George Candea

  • Improving availability with recursive microreboots: a soft-state system case study

    George Candea;James Cutler;Armando Fox

  • JAGR: an autonomous self-recovering application server

    G. Candea;E. Kiciman;S. Zhang;P. Keyani

  • Combining Visualization and Statistical Analysis to Improve Operator Confidence and Efficiency for Failure Detection and Localization

    P. Bodik;G. Friedman;L. Biewald;H. Levine

  • Automatic failure-path inference: a generic introspection technique for Internet applications

    G. Candea;M. Delgado;M. Chen;A. Fox

Frequent Co-Authors

Armando Fox
Armando Fox University of California, Berkeley
David A. Patterson
David A. Patterson University of California, Berkeley
Mike Y. Chen
Mike Y. Chen National Taiwan University
Emre Kiciman
Emre Kiciman Microsoft (United States)
Rachid Guerraoui
Rachid Guerraoui École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Anastasia Ailamaki
Anastasia Ailamaki École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
R. C. Sekar
R. C. Sekar Stony Brook University
Mathias Payer
Mathias Payer École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Dawn Song
Dawn Song University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a wide range of related degree programs and career opportunities. Many students expand their skillset by exploring other fields that complement tech-focused studies. For example, pairing computer science with criminal justice can prepare you for digital forensics or cybersecurity roles. If you’re interested in this route, consider starting with the cheapest online criminal justice degree options.

Combining programming skills with financial knowledge is also popular. You can boost your qualifications for roles in financial technology by enrolling in accounting classes online. Data science is another high-growth field for computer science graduates, and there are several pathways to the cheapest masters in data science programs if you want to specialize.

For those interested in technology’s impact on construction and project management, blending computer science with construction management can lead to exciting roles in smart building technologies. Check out the best construction management schools offering online study for more information.

Best Scientists Citing George Candea

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles