World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
4543
World Ranking
12229
National Ranking
422

Domenico Cotroneo publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Domenico Cotroneo sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 266 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Domenico Cotroneo D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Domenico Cotroneo sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Domenico Cotroneo is affiliated with the University of Naples Federico II in Italy. Their research primarily focuses on computer science, with significant contributions in various subfields including computer networks and communications, information systems, software, signal processing, and artificial intelligence.

Their work covers a range of topics, reflecting a diversity of interests within the broader field of software and systems engineering. Key topics include:

  • Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Software Engineering Research
  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
  • Distributed Systems and Fault Tolerance
  • Cloud Computing and Resource Management
  • Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

Cotroneo has published extensively, with 131 publications identified in the domain of computer science. The scientist has frequently published in the following venues:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Systems and Software
  • IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Empirical Software Engineering

Several recent publications further illustrate the scope of their research. These include:

  • "A comprehensive study on software aging across android versions and vendors" (2020), published in Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg)
  • "Timing covert channel analysis of the VxWorks MILS embedded hypervisor under the common criteria security certification" (2021), published in Computers & Security

Their collaborative work often involves frequent co-authors such as:

  • Roberto Natella
  • Pietro Liguori
  • Luigi De Simone
  • Cristina Improta
  • Roberto Pietrantuono

Domenico Cotroneo's research intersects with the areas of software system performance and reliability, malware detection, and fault tolerance, indicating a broad engagement with issues critical to software reliability and security. Their publication record and collaboration patterns highlight a sustained involvement in advancing software engineering research through both theoretical and applied work.

Best Publications

  • On Fault Representativeness of Software Fault Injection

    R. Natella;D. Cotroneo;J. A. Duraes;H. S. Madeira

  • A survey of software aging and rejuvenation studies

    Domenico Cotroneo;Roberto Natella;Roberto Pietrantuono;Stefano Russo

  • Assessing Dependability with Software Fault Injection: A Survey

    Roberto Natella;Domenico Cotroneo;Henrique S. Madeira

  • Software Aging Analysis of the Linux Operating System

    Domenico Cotroneo;Roberto Natella;Roberto Pietrantuono;Stefano Russo

  • Event Logs for the Analysis of Software Failures: A Rule-Based Approach

    M. Cinque;D. Cotroneo;A. Pecchia

  • Predicting aging-related bugs using software complexity metrics

    Domenico Cotroneo;Roberto Natella;Roberto Pietrantuono

  • Fault triggers in open-source software: An experience report

    Domenico Cotroneo;Michael Grottke;Roberto Natella;Roberto Pietrantuono

  • Improving Log-based Field Failure Data Analysis of multi-node computing systems

    Antonio Pecchia;Domenico Cotroneo;Zbigniew Kalbarczyk;Ravishankar K. Iyer

  • Network Function Virtualization: Challenges and Directions for Reliability Assurance

    D. Cotroneo;L. De Simone;A.K. Iannillo;A. Lanzaro

  • Software Aging and Rejuvenation: Where We Are and Where We Are Going

    Domenico Cotroneo;Roberto Natella;Roberto Pietrantuono;Stefano Russo

  • Industry Practices and Event Logging: Assessment of a Critical Software Development Process

    Unknown

  • Fault Injection for Software Certification

    D. Cotroneo;R. Natella

  • Security requirements in service oriented architectures for ubiquitous computing

    Domenico Cotroneo;Almerindo Graziano;Stefano Russo

  • Survey On reliability in publish/subscribe services

    Christian Esposito;Domenico Cotroneo;Stefano Russo

  • Automated Generation of Performance and Dependability Models for the Assessment of Wireless Sensor Networks

    C. Di Martino;M. Cinque;D. Cotroneo

  • Reliable publish/subscribe middleware for time-sensitive internet-scale applications

    Christian Esposito;Domenico Cotroneo;Aniruddha Gokhale

  • Experimental Analysis of Binary-Level Software Fault Injection in Complex Software

    Domenico Cotroneo;Anna Lanzaro;Roberto Natella;Ricardo Barbosa

  • Industry practices and event logging: assessment of a critical software development process

    Antonio Pecchia;Marcello Cinque;Gabriella Carrozza;Domenico Cotroneo

  • Characterizing Aging Phenomena of the Java Virtual Machine

    D. Cotroneo;S. Orlando;S. Russo

  • Effective fault treatment for improving the dependability of COTS and legacy-based applications

    A. Bondavalli;S. Chiaradonna;D. Cotroneo;L. Romano

  • An empirical study of injected versus actual interface errors

    Anna Lanzaro;Roberto Natella;Stefan Winter;Domenico Cotroneo

Frequent Co-Authors

Henrique Madeira
Henrique Madeira University of Coimbra
Ravishankar K. Iyer
Ravishankar K. Iyer University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Kishor S. Trivedi
Kishor S. Trivedi Duke University
Zbigniew Kalbarczyk
Zbigniew Kalbarczyk University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Aniruddha Gokhale
Aniruddha Gokhale Vanderbilt University
Bojan Cukic
Bojan Cukic University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Andrea Bondavalli
Andrea Bondavalli University of Florence
Paolo Bellavista
Paolo Bellavista University of Bologna
Yennun Huang
Yennun Huang Research Center for Information Technology Innovation, Academia Sinica
Douglas C. Schmidt
Douglas C. Schmidt William & Mary

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online options opens up a variety of flexible pathways for studying Computer Science in the USA. For those seeking a faster entry into the field, 1 year associate degree programs online can provide foundational skills and a stepping stone to higher-level studies or technical careers.

Budget is a key concern for many students. Enrolling in cheap online college classes can significantly reduce education costs while maintaining access to quality programs. Additionally, students with lower academic standing can benefit from online colleges that accept 2.0 gpa, making advanced education more accessible.

Computer Science skills can also complement interdisciplinary interests. If you're curious about fields like sustainability, you might explore what can i do with an environmental science degree to see how computing intersects with environmental problem-solving and data analysis.

Overall, online education offers flexible, affordable, and diverse routes into Computer Science and related career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Domenico Cotroneo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles