World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
43
Citations
9330
World Ranking
7883
National Ranking
202

Luca Foschini publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luca Foschini sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 323 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Luca Foschini D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luca Foschini sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Luca Foschini is affiliated with the University of Bologna in Italy and has contributed extensively to the field of Computer Science, particularly focusing on areas related to Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, and Artificial Intelligence. The scientist's work spans several specialized subfields including Transportation and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

The research topics covered in Luca Foschini's publications concentrate notably on Internet of Things (IoT) and Edge/Fog Computing, Software-Defined Networks and 5G technologies, Cloud Computing and Resource Management, as well as Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis. Additional subjects include Digital Transformation in Industry, Blockchain Technology Applications and Security, and Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing.

Recent publications demonstrate an active engagement in interdisciplinary collaborations and are published in recognized venues. Selected papers include:

  • Decentralised Learning in Federated Deployment Environments, 2021, ACM Computing Surveys
  • Game Theory in Mobile CrowdSensing: A Comprehensive Survey, 2020, Sensors
  • A Digital Twin Decision Support System for the Urban Facility Management Process, 2021, Sensors
  • Interoperable Blockchains for Highly-Integrated Supply Chains in Collaborative Manufacturing, 2021, Sensors
  • A Pre-Filtering Approach for Incorporating Contextual Information Into Deep Learning Based Recommender Systems, 2020, IEEE Access

Luca Foschini often collaborates with several co-authors who are active in related research fields. Frequent co-authors include Paolo Bellavista, Antonio Corradi, Domenico Scotece, Rebecca Montanari, and Isam Mashhour Al Jawarneh.

The scientist's work is regularly published in venues such as Sensors, arXiv (Cornell University), IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, the 2021 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), and the Journal of Network and Systems Management.

Luca Foschini's expertise is grounded firmly in Computer Science with a total of 136 publications contributing to the domain's knowledge base. The research spans both theoretical and applied dimensions, addressing evolving technological challenges related to network management, distributed systems, and data-driven decision systems.

Best Publications

  • Convergence of MANET and WSN in IoT Urban Scenarios

    Paolo Bellavista;Giuseppe Cardone;Antonio Corradi;Luca Foschini

  • A Survey on Mobile Crowdsensing Systems: Challenges, Solutions, and Opportunities

    Andrea Capponi;Claudio Fiandrino;Burak Kantarci;Luca Foschini

  • A survey of context data distribution for mobile ubiquitous systems

    Paolo Bellavista;Antonio Corradi;Mario Fanelli;Luca Foschini

  • Fostering participaction in smart cities: a geo-social crowdsensing platform

    G. Cardone;L. Foschini;P. Bellavista;A. Corradi

  • VM consolidation: A real case based on OpenStack Cloud

    Antonio Corradi;Mario Fanelli;Luca Foschini

  • Machine intelligence in healthcare-perspectives on trustworthiness, explainability, usability, and transparency.

    Christine M. Cutillo;Karlie R. Sharma;Luca Foschini;Shinjini Kundu

  • A survey on fog computing for the Internet of Things

    Paolo Bellavista;Javier Berrocal;Antonio Corradi;Sajal K. Das

  • A Stable Network-Aware VM Placement for Cloud Systems

    Ofer Biran;Antonio Corradi;Mario Fanelli;Luca Foschini

  • Reproducibility in machine learning for health research: Still a ways to go.

    Matthew B. A. McDermott;Shirly Wang;Shirly Wang;Nikki Marinsek;Rajesh Ranganath

  • DARGOS: A highly adaptable and scalable monitoring architecture for multi-tenant Clouds

    Javier Povedano-Molina;Jose M. Lopez-Vega;Juan M. Lopez-Soler;Antonio Corradi

  • M2M-based metropolitan platform for IMS-enabled road traffic management in IoT

    L. Foschini;T. Taleb;A. Corradi;D. Bottazzi

  • Quantifying User Reputation Scores, Data Trustworthiness, and User Incentives in Mobile Crowd-Sensing

    Maryam Pouryazdan;Burak Kantarci;Tolga Soyata;Luca Foschini

  • The participact mobile crowd sensing living lab: The testbed for smart cities

    Giuseppe Cardone;Andrea Cirri;Antonio Corradi;Luca Foschini

  • On the complexity of time-dependent shortest paths

    Luca Foschini;John Hershberger;Subhash Suri

  • Balanced Partitions of Trees and Applications

    Andreas Emil Feldmann;Luca Foschini

  • Deep learning models for electrocardiograms are susceptible to adversarial attack.

    Xintian Han;Yuxuan Hu;Luca Foschini;Larry Chinitz

  • Developing Measures of Cognitive Impairment in the Real World from Consumer-Grade Multimodal Sensor Streams

    Richard Chen;Filip Jankovic;Nikki Marinsek;Luca Foschini

  • Crowdsensing in Urban Areas for City-Scale Mass Gathering Management: Geofencing and Activity Recognition

    Giuseppe Cardone;Andrea Cirri;Antonio Corradi;Luca Foschini

  • On the Complexity of Time-Dependent Shortest Paths

    Luca Foschini;John Hershberger;Subhash Suri

  • Container Orchestration Engines: A Thorough Functional and Performance Comparison

    Isam Mashhour Al Jawarneh;Paolo Bellavista;Filippo Bosi;Luca Foschini

  • Hyperledger Fabric Blockchain: Chaincode Performance Analysis

    Luca Foschini;Andrea Gavagna;Giuseppe Martuscelli;Rebecca Montanari

  • Efficient Exploitation of Mobile Edge Computing for Virtualized 5G in EPC Architectures

    Eleonora Cau;Marius Corici;Paolo Bellavista;Luca Foschini

Frequent Co-Authors

Antonio Corradi
Antonio Corradi University of Bologna
Paolo Bellavista
Paolo Bellavista University of Bologna
Stefano Chessa
Stefano Chessa University of Pisa
Burak Kantarci
Burak Kantarci University of Ottawa
Azzedine Boukerche
Azzedine Boukerche University of Ottawa
Subhash Suri
Subhash Suri University of California, Santa Barbara
Rajesh Ranganath
Rajesh Ranganath New York University
Hussein T. Mouftah
Hussein T. Mouftah University of Ottawa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in computer science and related fields opens up numerous flexible pathways for students. Many are drawn to the cheapest online college options to help minimize education costs while gaining valuable skills. Budget-conscious learners can balance affordability with accreditation and quality, making a solid foundation for a tech-focused career.

Students with a lower undergraduate GPA sometimes wonder, will grad schools accept low gpa? The good news is that some reputable online graduate programs and colleges offer admission flexibility, considering work experience or test scores in their application process.

Beyond computer science, interdisciplinary degrees can lead to diverse opportunities. For example, if you’re interested in sustainability, you might ask, what jobs can you get with an environmental science degree? This path connects you to roles in environmental policy, consulting, or research.

For those eager to enter the workforce quickly, several fast track computer science degree programs allow you to complete your studies at an accelerated pace. These programs are ideal for career changers or those looking to quickly expand their tech credentials.

Best Scientists Citing Luca Foschini

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles