World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Gilles Chatellier

Gilles Chatellier

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
98
Citations
37360
World Ranking
8892
National Ranking
271

Gilles Chatellier publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gilles Chatellier sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 591 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Gilles Chatellier D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gilles Chatellier sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gilles Chatellier is affiliated with Université Paris Cité in France and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, focusing on areas such as surgery, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, oncology, and neurology. Their research spans a variety of clinical and healthcare-related topics frequently addressing aspects of disease management and treatment outcomes.

The scientist's recent publications include studies in high-impact journals across diverse medical specialties. Notable papers authored or co-authored by them are:

  • Anakinra for severe forms of COVID-19: a cohort study, 2020, The Lancet Rheumatology
  • Multivessel PCI Guided by FFR or Angiography for Myocardial Infarction, 2021, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Relationship of Tumor Radiation-absorbed Dose to Survival and Response in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Transarterial Radioembolization with 90Y in the SARAH Study, 2020, Radiology
  • Effect of anakinra on mortality in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis, 2021, The Lancet Rheumatology
  • Rivaroxaban vs Dalteparin in Cancer-Associated Thromboembolism, 2021, CHEST Journal

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Gilles Chatellier include:

  • Audrey Fels
  • Hélène Beaussier
  • Emmanuelle Kempf
  • Guillaume Lamé
  • Christophe Tournigand

The primary publication venues where they have contributed most frequently are:

  • Archives of cardiovascular diseases
  • JMV-Journal de Médecine Vasculaire
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • European Heart Journal
  • Academic Emergency Medicine

The main fields of study for Gilles Chatellier are Medicine with a specialized focus in certain subfields including:

  • Surgery
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Oncology
  • Neurology

Key research topics prominently addressed in their work encompass:

  • Peripheral Artery Disease Management
  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research

This profile captures the range and scope of Gilles Chatellier's academic contributions and ongoing engagement with issues across several medical research domains.

Best Publications

  • Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis

    Jean-Louis Mas;Gilles Chatellier;Bernard Beyssen;Alain Branchereau

  • The Myoblast Autologous Grafting in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (MAGIC) Trial: First Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study of Myoblast Transplantation

    Philippe Menasché;Ottavio Alfieri;Stefan Janssens;William McKenna

  • Cardiovascular Prognosis of Masked Hypertension Detected by Blood Pressure Self-measurement in Elderly Treated Hypertensive Patients

    Guillaume Bobrie;Gilles Chatellier;Nathalie Genes;Pierre Clerson

  • Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelets after Stroke

    Jean-Louis Mas;Genevieve Derumeaux;Benoit Guillon;Evelyne Massardier

  • Efficacy and safety of selective internal radiotherapy with yttrium-90 resin microspheres compared with sorafenib in locally advanced and inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (SARAH): an open-label randomised controlled phase 3 trial

    Valérie Vilgrain;Valérie Vilgrain;Helena Pereira;Eric Assenat;Boris Guiu

  • Blood Pressure Outcome of Angioplasty in Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis: A Randomized Trial

    Pierre François Plouin;Gilles Chatellier;Bernadette Darné;Alain Raynaud

  • Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty in Patients with Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis (EVA-3S) trial: results up to 4 years from a randomised, multicentre trial.

    Jean-Louis Mas;Ludovic Trinquart;Didier Leys;Jean-François Albucher

  • Very Long-Term Results (More Than 20 Years) of Valve Repair With Carpentier’s Techniques in Nonrheumatic Mitral Valve Insufficiency

    E. Braunberger;A. Deloche;A. Berrebi;F. Abdallah

  • Prognostic value of right ventricular dysfunction in patients with haemodynamically stable pulmonary embolism: a systematic review.

    Olivier Sanchez;Ludovic Trinquart;Isabelle Colombet;Isabelle Colombet;Pierre Durieux;Pierre Durieux

  • Optimum and stepped care standardised antihypertensive treatment with or without renal denervation for resistant hypertension (DENERHTN): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial

    Michel Azizi;Michel Azizi;Marc Sapoval;Marc Sapoval;Philippe Gosse;Matthieu Monge

  • Anakinra for severe forms of COVID-19: a cohort study

    Thomas Huet;Hélène Beaussier;Olivier Voisin;Stéphane Jouveshomme

  • Short-term outcome after stenting versus endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a preplanned meta-analysis of individual patient data.

    Leo H Bonati;Joanna Dobson;Ale Algra

  • Prevention of diabetic nephropathy with enalapril in normotensive diabetics with microalbuminuria.

    M. Marre;G. Chatellier;H. Leblanc;Tam Than Guyene

  • Extending thrombolysis to 4·5–9 h and wake-up stroke using perfusion imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data

    Bruce C V Campbell;Bruce C V Campbell;Henry Ma;Henry Ma;Peter A Ringleb;Mark W Parsons

  • Risk of myocardial infarction and vascular death after transient ischemic attack and ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Emmanuel Touzé;Olivier Varenne;Gilles Chatellier;Séverine Peyrard

  • Bilateral Negative Sentinel Nodes Accurately Predict Absence of Lymph Node Metastasis in Early Cervical Cancer: Results of the SENTICOL Study

    Fabrice Lécuru;Patrice Mathevet;Denis Querleu;Eric Leblanc

  • Year of diagnosis, features at presentation, and risk of recurrence in patients with pheochromocytoma or secreting paraganglioma.

    Laurence Amar;Aude Servais;Anne Paule Gimenez-Roqueplo;Franck Zinzindohoue

  • Contribution of genetic polymorphism in the renin-angiotensin system to the development of renal complications in insulin-dependent diabetes: Genetique de la Nephropathie Diabetique (GENEDIAB) study group.

    M Marre;X Jeunemaitre;Y Gallois;M Rodier

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of strategies for the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism

    Pierre-Marie Roy;Isabelle Colombet;Pierre Durieux;Gilles Chatellier

  • AbstractEndarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis

    J.-L. Mas;G. Chatellier;B. Beyssen

Frequent Co-Authors

Pierre-François Plouin
Pierre-François Plouin Université Paris Cité
Pierre Corvol
Pierre Corvol Collège de France
Michel Marre
Michel Marre Université Paris Cité
Jean-Louis Mas
Jean-Louis Mas Université Paris Cité
Guy Meyer
Guy Meyer Université Paris Cité
Xavier Jeunemaitre
Xavier Jeunemaitre Université Paris Cité
Thierry Lang
Thierry Lang Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Valérie Vilgrain
Valérie Vilgrain Université Paris Cité
Peter A. Ringleb
Peter A. Ringleb University Hospital Heidelberg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a future in Medicine doesn’t always require the traditional path. More students are choosing flexible online programs that help them enter or advance in the healthcare industry. For those interested in preventative care and well-being, online nutrition degrees can open doors to roles in community health, wellness coaching, and dietetics.

If you see yourself in a leadership or administrative role, it's important to know how to evaluate healthcare administration degree programs. Look for CAHME-accredited options that ensure quality education and better career prospects. For current nurses, career advancement is possible through specialized pathways—many are opting for online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements to gain needed credentials with more flexibility.

For those who already hold a master’s degree in nursing, leadership roles can be further pursued by enrolling in the shortest post master's dnp program. This makes achieving a terminal degree more accessible without significant time away from work. These related online degrees pave exciting and achievable pathways to a rewarding career in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Gilles Chatellier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles