World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
83
Citations
28404
World Ranking
15506
National Ranking
1427

Martin M. Brown publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin M. Brown sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 381 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Martin M. Brown D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin M. Brown sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin M. Brown is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily falls within the field of medicine, with a notable focus on neurology among other subfields including epidemiology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, and general health professions.

The scientist's recent publication record includes several studies spanning from 2020 to 2023. These publications cover a variety of medical topics and have appeared in well-regarded medical journals. Key recent papers include:

  • "Early Remdesivir to Prevent Progression to Severe Covid-19 in Outpatients" (2021), published in New England Journal of Medicine
  • "COVID-19-associated hyperinflammation and escalation of patient care: a retrospective longitudinal cohort study" (2020), published in The Lancet Rheumatology
  • "Ischemic Stroke despite Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation" (2020), published in Annals of Neurology
  • "Carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid artery stenosis" (2020), published in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  • "Carotid Plaque-RADS" (2023), published in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging

The research topics covered by Martin M. Brown include a strong emphasis on acute ischemic stroke management and cerebrovascular and carotid artery diseases. Additional areas of focus are cardiovascular health and disease prevention, intracranial aneurysms treatment and complications, intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhage research, atrial fibrillation management and outcomes, and neurosurgical procedures and complications.

Frequent collaborators in their work include several co-authors with whom they have published multiple papers. These co-authors are Hans Rolf Jäger, David J. Werring, Keith W. Muir, Gareth Ambler, and Leo H. Bonati.

Martin M. Brown has published extensively in several key venues relevant to their research areas. These include:

  • Stroke
  • Neurology
  • Journal of Vascular Surgery
  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
  • Annals of Neurology

Best Publications

  • Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial

    Jörg Ederle;Joanna Dobson;Joanna Dobson;Roland L. Featherstone;Leo H. Bonati;Leo H. Bonati

  • Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): a randomised trial

    M.M. Brown;J. Rogers;J.M. Bland

  • Neural correlates of motor recovery after stroke: a longitudinal fMRI study.

    N. S. Ward;M. M. Brown;A. J. Thompson;R. S. J. Frackowiak

  • Neural correlates of outcome after stroke: a cross-sectional fMRI study

    N. S. Ward;M. M. Brown;A. J. Thompson;R. S. J. Frackowiak

  • The Microbleed Anatomical Rating Scale (MARS): Reliability of a tool to map brain microbleeds

    S M Gregoire;U. J. Chaudhary;Martin M. Brown;Tarek A. Yousry

  • New ischaemic brain lesions on MRI after stenting or endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a substudy of the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS)

    Leo H Bonati;Leo H Bonati;Lisa M Jongen;Sven Haller;H Zwenneke Flach

  • Warfarin and Aspirin in Patients with Heart Failure and Sinus Rhythm

    Shunichi Homma;John L.P. Thompson;Patrick M. Pullicino;Bruce Levin

  • Long-term outcomes after stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) randomised trial

    Leo H Bonati;Leo H Bonati;Joanna Dobson;Roland L Featherstone;Jörg Ederle

  • Cognitive dysfunction in patients with cerebral microbleeds on T2*-weighted gradient-echo MRI

    David J Werring;Duncan W Frazer;Lucy J Coward;Nick A Losseff

  • Short-term outcome after stenting versus endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a preplanned meta-analysis of individual patient data.

    Leo H Bonati;Joanna Dobson;Ale Algra

  • Markers of endothelial dysfunction in lacunar infarction and ischaemic leukoaraiosis

    Ahamad Hassan;Beverley J. Hunt;Michael O’Sullivan;Kiran Parmar

  • Percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty and stenting for carotid artery stenosis.

    Leo H Bonati;Philippe Lyrer;Jörg Ederle;Roland Featherstone

  • Penumbral imaging and functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy versus medical therapy: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data

    Bruce C V Campbell;Charles B L M Majoie;Gregory W Albers;Bijoy K Menon

  • FUNDAMENTAL IMPORTANCE OF ARTERIAL OXYGEN CONTENT IN THE REGULATION OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW IN MAN

    Martin M. Brown;J. P. H. Wade;John Marshall

  • Imaging features and safety and efficacy of endovascular stroke treatment: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data.

    Luis San Roman;Bijoy K. Menon;Jordi Blasco;Maria Hernandez-Perez

  • Triptans in migraine: The risks of stroke, cardiovascular disease, and death in practice

    Gillian C. Hall;Martin M. Brown;Jingping Mo;Kenneth D. MacRae

  • Differentiation between different pathological cerebral embolic materials using transcranial Doppler in an in vitro model.

    H S Markus;M M Brown

  • Safety and Efficacy of Endovascular Treatment of Carotid Artery Stenosis Compared With Carotid Endarterectomy: A Cochrane Systematic Review of the Randomized Evidence

    Lucy J. Coward;Roland L. Featherstone;Martin M. Brown

  • Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Gene Deletion Polymorphism A New Risk Factor for Lacunar Stroke but not Carotid Atheroma

    Markus Hs;Barley J;Lunt R;Bland Jm

  • Endovascular therapy for acute ischaemic stroke: the Pragmatic Ischaemic Stroke Thrombectomy Evaluation (PISTE) randomised, controlled trial

    Keith W Muir;Gary A Ford;Claudia-Martina Messow;Ian Ford

Frequent Co-Authors

David J. Werring
David J. Werring University College London
Gregory Y.H. Lip
Gregory Y.H. Lip University of Liverpool
Tarek A. Yousry
Tarek A. Yousry University College London
Keith W. Muir
Keith W. Muir University of Glasgow
Stefan T. Engelter
Stefan T. Engelter University Hospital of Basel
Ale Algra
Ale Algra Leiden University
Jean-Louis Mas
Jean-Louis Mas Université Paris Cité
Peter A. Ringleb
Peter A. Ringleb University Hospital Heidelberg
Thomas G. Brott
Thomas G. Brott Mayo Clinic
Henry Houlden
Henry Houlden University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in medical careers outside traditional physician roles, online nursing degrees provide flexible and affordable alternatives. Many students begin with a Registered Nurse qualification and then seek further education online. For example, students can pursue the cheapest rn to bsn program or explore the cheapest rn to bsn online path to advance their credentials and boost job opportunities.

For those aiming to step into leadership or advanced practice roles, there are options such as the cheapest nurse practitioner programs. These programs enable RNs to become Nurse Practitioners, allowing them more responsibility and specialization within healthcare settings.

If your career goals include nursing education, research, or high-level administrative positions, consider online doctoral studies like the phd nursing education online program. These advanced degrees open doors to teaching at universities, conducting impactful research, or shaping healthcare policy.

By exploring these online degrees and pathways, you can find a route that matches your interests, budget, and professional aspirations in the ever-growing field of healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Martin M. Brown

Trending Scientists