World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Robert L. Goldstone

Robert L. Goldstone

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
73
Citations
20805
World Ranking
1960
National Ranking
1146

Neuroscience

D-Index
77
Citations
22146
World Ranking
1834
National Ranking
883

Robert L. Goldstone publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert L. Goldstone sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 331 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Robert L. Goldstone D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert L. Goldstone sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2004 - Troland Research Awards, United States National Academy of Sciences For novel experimental analyses and elegant modeling that show how perceptual learning dynamically adjusts dimensions and boundaries of categories and concepts in human thought.

Overview

Robert L. Goldstone is affiliated with Indiana University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and social sciences, with significant contributions in developmental and educational psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, sociology and political science, and artificial intelligence.

The scientist's work addresses several key topics, including:

  • Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Language and Cultural Evolution
  • Categorization, Perception, and Language
  • Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes

Among frequent co-authors are Marina Dubova, Benjamin Motz, Emily R. Fyfe, Paulo F. Carvalho, and Edgar Andrade-Lotero. Collaborative efforts have often appeared in prominent venues reflecting cognitive and psychological research.

Robert L. Goldstone has published extensively in the following venues:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Cognitive Research Principles and Implications
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Cognition
  • Journal of The Royal Society Interface

Selected recent publications include:

  • Why does peer instruction benefit student learning? (2020), published in Cognitive Research Principles and Implications
  • Beyond collective intelligence: Collective adaptation (2023), published in Journal of The Royal Society Interface
  • ManyClasses 1: Assessing the Generalizable Effect of Immediate Feedback Versus Delayed Feedback Across Many College Classes (2021), published in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
  • The present and future of peer review: Ideas, interventions, and evidence (2025), published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Coordination and Consonance Between Interacting, Improvising Musicians (2020), published in Open Mind

Robert L. Goldstone has been recognized with the Troland Research Awards from the United States National Academy of Sciences in 2004 for work related to perceptual learning and category adjustment. In 2016, they were named a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.

Best Publications

  • Respects for similarity

    Douglas L. Medin;Robert L. Goldstone;Dedre Gentner

  • The development of features in object concepts

    Philippe G. Schyns;Robert L. Goldstone;Jean-Pierre Thibaut

  • Influences of categorization on perceptual discrimination.

    Robert L. Goldstone

  • The role of similarity in categorization: providing a groundwork.

    Robert L. Goldstone

  • Reuniting perception and conception.

    Robert L Goldstone;Lawrence W Barsalou

  • The Transfer of Scientific Principles Using Concrete and Idealized Simulations

    Robert L. Goldstone;Ji Y. Son

  • Relational similarity and the nonindependence of features in similarity judgments.

    Robert L Goldstone;Douglas L Medin;Dedre Gentner

  • Similarity-Dissimilarity Competition in Disjunctive Classification Tasks

    Fabien Mathy;Harry Haroutioun Haladjian;Eric Laurent;Rob. L. Goldstone

  • Computational models of collective behavior

    Robert L. Goldstone;Marco A. Janssen

  • Similarity, interactive activation, and mapping

    Robert Lee Goldstone

  • Altering object representations through category learning.

    Robert L Goldstone;Yvonne Lippa;Richard M Shiffrin

  • The transfer of abstract principles governing complex adaptive systems

    Robert L Goldstone;Yasuaki Sakamoto

  • Concreteness Fading in Mathematics and Science Instruction: A Systematic Review.

    Emily R. Fyfe;Nicole M. McNeil;Ji Y. Son;Robert L. Goldstone

  • The Import of Knowledge Export: Connecting Findings and Theories of Transfer of Learning

    Samuel B. Day;Robert L. Goldstone

  • Transformational Play as a Curricular Scaffold: Using Videogames to Support Science Education

    Sasha A. Barab;Brianna Scott;Sinem Siyahhan;Robert Goldstone

  • Recognizing group cognition

    Georg Theiner;Colin Allen;Robert L. Goldstone

  • Similarity Involving Attributes and Relations: Judgments of Similarity and Difference Are Not Inverses

    Douglas L. Medin;Robert L. Goldstone;Dedre Gentner

  • Effects of Categorization on Color Perception

    Robert L. Goldstone

  • The sensitization and differentiation of dimensions during category learning.

    Robert L. Goldstone;Mark Steyvers

  • Promoting Transfer by Grounding Complex Systems Principles.

    Robert L. Goldstone;Uri Wilensky

  • Categorical perception

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter M. Todd
Peter M. Todd Indiana University
Douglas L. Medin
Douglas L. Medin Northwestern University
Thomas L. Griffiths
Thomas L. Griffiths Princeton University
Mark Steyvers
Mark Steyvers University of California, Irvine
Loet Leydesdorff
Loet Leydesdorff University of Amsterdam
Gary Lupyan
Gary Lupyan University of Wisconsin–Madison
Linda B. Smith
Linda B. Smith Indiana University
Philippe G. Schyns
Philippe G. Schyns University of Glasgow
Arthur B. Markman
Arthur B. Markman The University of Texas at Austin
Dedre Gentner
Dedre Gentner Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open doors to a variety of related fields and online degrees, giving you the flexibility to customize your career path. Many students with a background in neuroscience pursue advanced degrees in mental health or applied behavior analysis to expand their expertise and job opportunities.

For example, online msw programs are a popular pathway for those interested in clinical social work or mental health practice. If you’re looking to study at a faster pace, there are also accelerated online msw programs that help you earn your degree more quickly.

Those drawn to behavioral science may consider becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). Enrolling in a bcba school online allows you to specialize in applied behavior analysis and reach leadership roles in therapy or education.

Additionally, an accelerated online bachelor's degree in psychology offers foundational knowledge that complements neuroscience and supports careers in research, counseling, or human services.

Best Scientists Citing Robert L. Goldstone

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles