World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
64
Citations
21187
World Ranking
2921
National Ranking
1679

Arthur B. Markman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arthur B. Markman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 228 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Arthur B. Markman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arthur B. Markman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Arthur B. Markman is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Computer Science, including work in the subfields of Computer Science Applications and Artificial Intelligence.

The scientist's recent publications include studies published in reputable venues such as the Journal of Intercultural Management and Ethics and Frontiers in Education. Their notable papers are:

  • Rethinking Supply Chains as Neighborhoods, 2020, Journal of Intercultural Management and Ethics
  • Building responsible AI chatbot platforms in higher education: an evidence-based framework from design to implementation, 2025, Frontiers in Education

Their research addresses multiple topics connected to the application of AI and technology in education and service interactions, focusing on:

  • Online Learning and Analytics
  • AI in Service Interactions
  • E-Learning and Knowledge Management

Frequent collaborators in their work include researchers such as Matt Kammer-Kerwick, Kara Takasaki, Bruce Kellison, Gregory P. Pogue, and Julie Schell.

Arthur B. Markman's contributions have appeared in venues that reflect interdisciplinary interests, with publications in:

  • Journal of Intercultural Management and Ethics
  • Frontiers in Education

Best Publications

  • Structure mapping in analogy and similarity.

    Dedre Gentner;Arthur B. Markman

  • Structural Alignment during Similarity Comparisons

    Arthur B. Markman;Dedre Gentner

  • Knowledge Representation

    Arthur B. Markman

  • Entrenched Knowledge Structures and Consumer Response to New Products

    C. Page Moreau;Donald R. Lehmann;Arthur B. Markman

  • Category Use and Category Learning

    Arthur B. Markman;Brian H. Ross

  • Structural Alignment in Comparison: No Difference Without Similarity:

    Dedre Gentner;Arthur B. Markman

  • Designing the Solution: The Impact of Constraints on Consumers' Creativity

    C. Page Moreau;Darren W. Dahl

  • Splitting the Differences: A Structural Alignment View of Similarity

    Arthur B. Markman;Dedre Gentner

  • “What Is It?” Categorization Flexibility and Consumers' Responses to Really New Products

    C. Page Moreau;Arthur B. Markman;Donald R. Lehmann

  • Constraining Theories of Embodied Cognition

    Arthur B. Markman;C. Miguel Brendl

  • Overcoming the Early Entrant Advantage: The Role of Alignable and Nonalignable Differences:

    Shi Zhang;Arthur B. Markman

  • How do indirect measures of evaluation work? Evaluating the inference of prejudice in the Implicit Association Test.

    C. Miguel Brendl;Arthur B. Markman;Claude Messner

  • The Curse of Planning Dissecting Multiple Reinforcement-Learning Systems by Taxing the Central Executive

    A. Ross Otto;Samuel J. Gershman;Arthur B. Markman;Nathaniel D. Daw

  • Category Learning by Inference and Classification

    Takashi Yamauchi;Arthur B. Markman

  • An Experimental Study of Group Idea Generation Techniques: Understanding the Roles of Idea Representation and Viewing Methods

    J. S. Linsey;E. F. Clauss;T. Kurtoglu;J. T. Murphy

  • Commonalities and differences in similarity comparisons.

    Arthur B. Markman;Dedre Gentner

  • Inference Using Categories

    Takashi Yamauchi;Arthur B. Markman

  • The Devaluation Effect: Activating a Need Devalues Unrelated Objects

    C. Miguel Brendl;Arthur B. Markman;Claude Messner

  • There Are Many Ways to See the Forest for the Trees: A Tour Guide for Abstraction.

    Erin M. Burgoon;Marlone Deshaun Henderson;Arthur B Markman

  • Retrospective revaluation in sequential decision making: a tale of two systems.

    Samuel J. Gershman;Arthur B. Markman;A. Ross Otto

  • Similar and Different: The Differentiation of Basic-Level Categories

    Arthur B. Markman;Edward J. Wisniewski

  • A framework for the unification of the behavioral sciences. Commentaries. Author's reply

    Herbert Gintis;George Ainslie;Larry Arnhart;R. Alexander Bentley

Frequent Co-Authors

W. Todd Maddox
W. Todd Maddox The University of Texas at Austin
Dedre Gentner
Dedre Gentner Northwestern University
Kristin L. Wood
Kristin L. Wood University of Colorado Denver
Julie S. Linsey
Julie S. Linsey Georgia Institute of Technology
Bradley C. Love
Bradley C. Love University College London
A. Ross Otto
A. Ross Otto McGill University
Douglas L. Medin
Douglas L. Medin Northwestern University
David M. Schnyer
David M. Schnyer The University of Texas at Austin
E. Tory Higgins
E. Tory Higgins Columbia University
Robert L. Goldstone
Robert L. Goldstone Indiana University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens up diverse opportunities, especially with the rise of flexible online degree programs. Many students are choosing online pathways to earn their degree and start working towards licensure as therapists or counselors.

The requirements to become a licensed therapist vary by state and city. Candidates typically need a master’s degree in counseling, psychology, or a related field, followed by supervised clinical experience. For example, you can review the process in California by learning how to become a licensed therapist in Santa Ana. If you’re interested in Arizona, check out licensed therapist requirements in Scottsdale.

Each region often has distinct coursework, exam, and supervised hour requirements. For example, the Seattle licensed therapist education requirements detail Washington State’s expectations, while Spokane licensed therapist requirements cover the specifics for that city.

No matter your location, pursuing an online degree can be the first step toward a rewarding career in mental health, offering flexibility and a wide range of career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Arthur B. Markman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles