World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
8619
World Ranking
9060
National Ranking
4806

John E. Hummel publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John E. Hummel sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 124 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

John E. Hummel D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John E. Hummel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

John E. Hummel is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their research predominantly lies within the field of Neuroscience, with a particular focus on Cognitive Neuroscience. The scientist's work encompasses several subfields, including Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Geometry and Topology, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The main topics explored in their research include:

  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neural Networks and Applications
  • Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Morphological variations and asymmetry
  • Face Recognition and Perception

John E. Hummel has contributed to various publication venues. Their frequent publication outlets are:

  • Journal of Vision
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • Cognition

Among recent papers authored or coauthored by John E. Hummel are:

  • "Human shape representations are not an emergent property of learning to classify objects." (2023) - Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • "Human shape representations are not an emergent property of learning to classify objects." (2021) - bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "Clarifying status of DNNs as models of human vision" (2023) - Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • "How does multidimensional complexity impact processing efficiency in visual search?" (2021) - Journal of Vision
  • "Asynchronous visual flicker alters perceived curvature" (2021) - Journal of Vision

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Alejandro Lleras
  • Simona Buetti
  • Rachel Flood Heaton
  • Gaurav Malhotra
  • Marin Dujmović

Best Publications

  • Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping.

    John E. Hummel;Keith J. Holyoak

  • Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition.

    John E. Hummel;Irving Biederman

  • A symbolic-connectionist theory of relational inference and generalization.

    John E. Hummel;Keith J. Holyoak

  • A Theory of the Discovery and Predication of Relational Concepts.

    Leonidas A. A. Doumas;John E. Hummel;Catherine M. Sandhofer

  • Countering antivaccination attitudes

    Zachary Horne;Derek Powell;John E. Hummel;Keith J. Holyoak

  • A Neurocomputational Model of Analogical Reasoning and its Breakdown in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration

    Robert G. Morrison;Daniel C. Krawczyk;Keith J. Holyoak;John E. Hummel

  • Relational integration, inhibition, and analogical reasoning in older adults.

    Indre V. Viskontas;Robert G. Morrison;Keith J. Holyoak;John E. Hummel

  • A neurocomputational system for relational reasoning

    Barbara J. Knowlton;Robert G. Morrison;John E. Hummel;Keith J. Holyoak

  • Where View-based Theories Break Down: The Role of Structure in Shape Perception and Object Recognition

    John E. Hummel

  • Complementary solutions to the binding problem in vision: Implications for shape perception and object recognition

    John E. Hummel

  • Metric invariance in object recognition: a review and further evidence.

    Eric E. Cooper;Irving Biederman;John E. Hummel

  • Relational Reasoning in a Neurally Plausible Cognitive Architecture An Overview of the LISA Project

    John E. Hummel;Keith J. Holyoak

  • Familiar interacting object pairs are perceptually grouped.

    Collin Green;John E. Hummel

  • Approaches to Modeling Human Mental Representations: What Works, What Doesn't, and Why.

    Leonidas A. A. Doumas;John E. Hummel

  • An architecture for rapid, hierarchical structural description

    John E Hummel;Brian J. Stankiewicz

  • The role of attention in priming for left-right reflections of object images: evidence for a dual representation of object shape.

    Brian J. Stankiewicz;Brian J. Stankiewicz;John E. Hummel;Eric E. Cooper

  • The use of diagrams in analogical problem solving.

    Roberto Pedone;John E. Hummel;Keith J. Holyoak

  • Causality and the allocation of attention during comprehension.

    Charles R. Fletcher;John E. Hummel;Chad J. Marsolek

  • Comparison-induced decoy effects.

    Jessica M. Choplin;John E. Hummel

  • Two Roles for Attention in Shape Perception: A Structural Description Model of Visual Scrutiny

    John E. Hummel;Brian J. Stankiewicz

  • The Proper Treatment of Symbols in a Connectionist Architecture

    Keith J. Holyoak;John E. Hummel

Frequent Co-Authors

Keith J. Holyoak
Keith J. Holyoak University of California, Los Angeles
Jules Davidoff
Jules Davidoff Goldsmiths University of London
Irving Biederman
Irving Biederman University of Southern California
Barbara J. Knowlton
Barbara J. Knowlton University of California, Los Angeles
Aniket Kittur
Aniket Kittur Carnegie Mellon University
Daniel C. Krawczyk
Daniel C. Krawczyk The University of Texas at Dallas
Brian H. Ross
Brian H. Ross University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Philip J. Kellman
Philip J. Kellman University of California, Los Angeles
Michael J. Tarr
Michael J. Tarr Carnegie Mellon University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens up diverse career pathways, with social work being a popular and impactful choice. Many students opt for online degrees to accommodate busy schedules and gain flexibility while preparing for licensure.

To become a social worker in the U.S., each state has specific education and licensing requirements. For example, you can learn more about Mississippi social work license requirements and how they might influence your study plans. Similarly, understanding the Missouri social work education requirements will help you select the right academic path if you plan to practice in Missouri.

If you're considering opportunities further north, make sure to research the requirements to be a social worker in Montana. Aspiring social workers in the Midwest should also review key information about becoming a social worker in Nebraska, as licensing criteria can differ widely.

Exploring these state-specific guidelines will empower you to choose the best online psychology or social work program to fast-track your career and meet regional professional standards.

Best Scientists Citing John E. Hummel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles