World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
5204
World Ranking
10484
National Ranking
5509

Daniel C. Krawczyk publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel C. Krawczyk sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 91 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Daniel C. Krawczyk D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel C. Krawczyk sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel C. Krawczyk is affiliated with The University of Texas at Dallas in the United States. Their research spans multiple interconnected fields including Neuroscience, Psychology, and Medicine, with a considerable focus on Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Mechanical Engineering.

The scientist's work covers various main topics, notably Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes, Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies, High Entropy Alloys Studies, Sport Psychology and Performance, as well as Visual Perception and Processing Mechanisms.

Frequent publication venues include:

  • Military Medicine (2 publications)
  • Procedia CIRP (1 publication)
  • Memory & Cognition (1 publication)
  • Brain Research (1 publication)
  • European Eating Disorders Review (1 publication)

Frequent co-authors associated with Daniel C. Krawczyk are:

  • Michael Lundie (2 co-authorships)
  • Colin Reiff (1 co-authorship)
  • Wolfgang Bubeck (1 co-authorship)
  • Maximilian Steeb (1 co-authorship)
  • Armin Lechler (1 co-authorship)

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Daniel C. Krawczyk are:

  • Learning Feedforward Control for Laser Powder Bed Fusion, 2021, published in Procedia CIRP
  • Are the advantages of chess expertise on visuo-spatial working-memory capacity domain specific or domain general?, 2021, published in Memory & Cognition
  • Estimates of brain age for gray matter and white matter in younger and older adults: Insights into human intelligence, 2021, published in Brain Research
  • Neural processes related to negative self-concept in adult and adolescent anorexia nervosa, 2021, published in European Eating Disorders Review
  • Efficacy of Cognitive Training When Translated From the Laboratory to the Real World, 2021, published in Military Medicine

Best Publications

  • Virtual Reality Social Cognition Training for Young Adults with High-Functioning Autism

    Michelle R. Kandalaft;Nyaz Didehbani;Daniel C. Krawczyk;Daniel C. Krawczyk;Tandra T. Allen

  • Contributions of the prefrontal cortex to the neural basis of human decision making.

    Daniel C Krawczyk

  • Virtual Reality Social Cognition Training for children with high functioning autism

    Nyaz Didehbani;Tandra Allen;Michelle Kandalaft;Daniel Krawczyk

  • Construction of Preferences by Constraint Satisfaction

    Dan Simon;Daniel C. Krawczyk;Keith J. Holyoak

  • A Neurocomputational Model of Analogical Reasoning and its Breakdown in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration

    Robert G. Morrison;Daniel C. Krawczyk;Keith J. Holyoak;John E. Hummel

  • The cognition and neuroscience of relational reasoning.

    Daniel C. Krawczyk

  • Reward modulation of prefrontal and visual association cortex during an incentive working memory task

    Daniel C. Krawczyk;Adam Gazzaley;Mark D'Esposito

  • Distraction during relational reasoning: The role of prefrontal cortex in interference control

    Daniel C. Krawczyk;Robert G. Morrison;Indre Viskontas;Keith J. Holyoak

  • Differences in task demands influence the hemispheric lateralization and neural correlates of metaphor

    Fanpei Gloria Yang;Jennifer Edens;Claire Simpson;Daniel C. Krawczyk

  • The transience of constructed preferences

    Dan Simon;Daniel C. Krawczyk;Airom Bleicher;Keith J. Holyoak

  • A hierarchy for relational reasoning in the prefrontal cortex.

    Daniel C. Krawczyk;M. Michelle McClelland;Colin M. Donovan

  • Disrupted intrinsic connectivity among default, dorsal attention, and frontoparietal control networks in individuals with chronic traumatic brain injury

    Kihwan Han;Sandra B. Chapman;Daniel C. Krawczyk

  • Figurative language processing after traumatic brain injury in adults: a preliminary study.

    Fanpei Gloria Yang;Fanpei Gloria Yang;Jerome Fuller;Navid Khodaparast;Daniel C. Krawczyk

  • Impaired neural processing of social attribution in anorexia nervosa.

    Carrie J. McAdams;Daniel C. Krawczyk;Daniel C. Krawczyk

  • Modulation of working memory function by motivation through loss-aversion.

    Daniel C. Krawczyk;Mark D'Esposito

  • Who am I? How do I look? Neural differences in self-identity in anorexia nervosa.

    Carrie J. McAdams;Daniel C. Krawczyk

  • Chess masters show a hallmark of face processing with chess.

    Amy L. Boggan;James C. Bartlett;Daniel C. Krawczyk

  • An fMRI investigation of cognitive stages in reasoning by analogy

    Daniel C. Krawczyk;M. Michelle McClelland;Colin M. Donovan;Gail D. Tillman

  • The neural organization of perception in chess experts

    Daniel C. Krawczyk;Amy L. Boggan;M. Michelle McClelland;James C. Bartlett

  • The One-to-One Constraint in Analogical Mapping and Inference.

    Daniel C. Krawczyk;Keith J. Holyoak;John E. Hummel

Frequent Co-Authors

Sandra B. Chapman
Sandra B. Chapman The University of Texas at Dallas
Keith J. Holyoak
Keith J. Holyoak University of California, Los Angeles
James C. Bartlett
James C. Bartlett The University of Texas at Dallas
Bart Rypma
Bart Rypma The University of Texas at Dallas
Elisabeth A. Wilde
Elisabeth A. Wilde Baylor College of Medicine
Carol A. Tamminga
Carol A. Tamminga The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
John Hart
John Hart University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Barbara J. Knowlton
Barbara J. Knowlton University of California, Los Angeles
John E. Hummel
John E. Hummel University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Gerri Hanten
Gerri Hanten Baylor College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens diverse career opportunities, especially in the booming field of mental health. Many students opt for online degrees to allow for flexible study schedules and access to various specializations. These pathways can lead to roles such as clinical psychologists, mental health counselors, or behavioral therapists.

If you are interested in counseling careers, it's important to research local licensing requirements, as these can vary widely. For example, the mental health counselor requirements in Houston differ from those in other cities. Similarly, you can learn about how to become a mental health counselor in Huntsville, which outlines unique steps and certification processes.

For those located elsewhere, reviewing city-specific guidance like how to become a mental health counselor in Indianapolis or how to become a mental health counselor in Irvine is crucial. Understanding these localized requirements helps you plan your education and career path effectively, setting you up for success in the mental health field.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel C. Krawczyk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles