World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 60 1459 1302 697 612 266 14705
Computer Science 56 4062 3948 1934 1867 239 12992

Scott A. Crossley publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Scott A. Crossley between 2006 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Scott A. Crossley published across 21 years, from 2006 to 2026, averaging 14.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2016. 9 of the 302 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2016. 2006: 2 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 30 publications 2017: 24 publications 2018: 22 publications 2019: 24 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 8 publications 2026: 1 publication
2006 2026

302 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Scott A. Crossley: publications per year, 2006 to 2026
Year Publications
2006 2
2007 7
2008 8
2009 5
2010 11
2011 21
2012 13
2013 17
2014 19
2015 10
2016 30
2017 24
2018 22
2019 24
2020 22
2021 17
2022 20
2023 12
2024 9
2025 8
2026 1
Total 302
Download as CSV

Scott A. Crossley publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott A. Crossley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 264–273 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 266 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138 266
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Scott A. Crossley D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott A. Crossley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106 60
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Scott A. Crossley is affiliated with Vanderbilt University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily within Computer Science and Psychology, with a focus on specific subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, General Health Professions, and Language and Linguistics.

Their main research topics encompass:

  • Text Readability and Simplification
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Topic Modeling
  • Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Writing and Handwriting Education
  • EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Health Literacy and Information Accessibility

Scott A. Crossley has contributed frequently to several publication venues, including:

  • Journal of Writing Research
  • International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Behavior Research Methods
  • Assessing Writing
  • 2022 International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT)

Among their recent papers are:

  • Linguistic features in writing quality and development: An overview, 2020, Journal of Writing Research
  • A large-scaled corpus for assessing text readability, 2022, Behavior Research Methods

Frequent co-authors with whom Scott A. Crossley has collaborated include:

  • Danielle S. McNamara
  • Langdon Holmes
  • Mihai Dascălu
  • Minkyung Kim
  • Wesley Morris

Best Publications

  • Linguistic Features of Writing Quality

    Danielle S. McNamara;Scott A. Crossley;Philip M. McCarthy

  • Automatically Assessing Lexical Sophistication: Indices, Tools, Findings, and Application

    Kristopher Kyle;Scott A. Crossley

  • A Linguistic Analysis of Simplified and Authentic Texts

    Scotta A. Crossley;Maxm M. Louwerse;Phillip M. McCarthy;Danielle McNamara

  • Assessing Text Readability Using Cognitively Based Indices

    Scott A. Crossley;Jerry Greenfield;Danielle S. McNAMARA

  • Predicting Second Language Writing Proficiency: The Roles of Cohesion and Linguistic Sophistication

    Scott A. Crossley;Danielle S. McNamara

  • Measuring Syntactic Complexity in L2 Writing Using Fine-Grained Clausal and Phrasal Indices.

    Kristopher Kyle;Scott A. Crossley

  • The tool for the automatic analysis of lexical sophistication (TAALES): version 2.0

    Kristopher Kyle;Scott Crossley;Cynthia Berger

  • The tool for the automatic analysis of text cohesion (TAACO): Automatic assessment of local, global, and text cohesion

    Scott A. Crossley;Kristopher Kyle;Danielle S. McNamara

  • Does writing development equal writing quality? A computational investigation of syntactic complexity in L2 learners

    Scott A. Crossley;Danielle S. McNamara

  • Predicting human judgments of essay quality in both integrated and independent second language writing samples: A comparison study

    Liang Guo;Scott A. Crossley;Danielle S. McNamara

  • Computational assessment of lexical differences in L1 and L2 writing

    Scott A. Crossley;Danielle S. McNamara

  • Text readability and intuitive simplification: A comparison of readability formulas

    Scott A. Crossley;David B. Allen;Danielle S. McNamara

  • Predicting lexical proficiency in language learner texts using computational indices

    Scott A. Crossley;Tom Salsbury;Danielle S. McNamara;Scott Jarvis

  • The development and use of cohesive devices in L2 writing and their relations to judgments of essay quality

    Scott A. Crossley;Kristopher Kyle;Danielle S. McNamara

  • The Development of Writing Proficiency as a Function of Grade Level: A Linguistic Analysis:

    Scott A. Crossley;Jennifer L. Weston;Susan T. McLain Sullivan;Danielle S. McNamara

  • Sentiment Analysis and Social Cognition Engine (SEANCE): An automatic tool for sentiment, social cognition, and social-order analysis

    Scott A. Crossley;Kristopher Kyle;Danielle S. McNamara

  • A Hierarchical Classification Approach to Automated Essay Scoring.

    Danielle S. McNamara;Scott A. Crossley;Rod D. Roscoe;Laura K. Allen

  • Natural language processing in an intelligent writing strategy tutoring system

    Danielle S. McNamara;Scott A. Crossley;Rod Roscoe

  • The relationship between lexical sophistication and independent and source-based writing

    Kristopher Kyle;Scott Crossley

  • The Development of Polysemy and Frequency Use in English Second Language Speakers

    Scott Crossley;Tom Salsbury;Danielle McNamara

Frequent Co-Authors

Danielle S. McNamara
Danielle S. McNamara Arizona State University
Andrew J. Karter
Andrew J. Karter Kaiser Permanente
Dean Schillinger
Dean Schillinger University of California, San Francisco
Ryan S. Baker
Ryan S. Baker University of Pennsylvania
YouJin Kim
YouJin Kim Georgia State University
Tiffany Barnes
Tiffany Barnes North Carolina State University
Zhiqiang Cai
Zhiqiang Cai Purdue University West Lafayette
Kevyn Collins-Thompson
Kevyn Collins-Thompson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Arthur C. Graesser
Arthur C. Graesser University of Memphis
Sidney K. D'Mello
Sidney K. D'Mello University of Colorado Boulder

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in social sciences and humanities opens a world of flexible academic and career opportunities. Programs now offer various study formats—like part-time options—catering to busy professionals. For instance, part time psyd programs let students balance work, life, and doctoral-level psychology studies.

Counseling and therapy remain in high demand, and you can now complete mft programs (Marriage and Family Therapy) entirely online in less time than ever before. If you're looking for flexibility and cost savings, numerous online psychology masters programs provide budget-friendly pathways to careers in counseling, human resources, and more.

For education professionals aiming to advance their credentials at record pace, 1 year edd programs online offer the fastest route to leadership roles in educational settings. With these varied options, pursuing your passion in the social sciences and humanities has never been more accessible or career-focused.

Best Scientists Citing Scott A. Crossley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles