World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
60
Citations
14705
World Ranking
1459
National Ranking
697

Computer Science

D-Index
56
Citations
12992
World Ranking
4062
National Ranking
1934

Scott A. Crossley publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott A. Crossley sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 266 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Scott A. Crossley D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott A. Crossley sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Scott A. Crossley is affiliated with Vanderbilt University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily within Computer Science and Psychology, with a focus on specific subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, General Health Professions, and Language and Linguistics.

Their main research topics encompass:

  • Text Readability and Simplification
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Topic Modeling
  • Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Writing and Handwriting Education
  • EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Health Literacy and Information Accessibility

Scott A. Crossley has contributed frequently to several publication venues, including:

  • Journal of Writing Research
  • International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Behavior Research Methods
  • Assessing Writing
  • 2022 International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT)

Among their recent papers are:

  • Linguistic features in writing quality and development: An overview, 2020, Journal of Writing Research
  • A large-scaled corpus for assessing text readability, 2022, Behavior Research Methods

Frequent co-authors with whom Scott A. Crossley has collaborated include:

  • Danielle S. McNamara
  • Langdon Holmes
  • Mihai Dascălu
  • Minkyung Kim
  • Wesley Morris

Best Publications

  • Linguistic Features of Writing Quality

    Danielle S. McNamara;Scott A. Crossley;Philip M. McCarthy

  • Automatically Assessing Lexical Sophistication: Indices, Tools, Findings, and Application

    Kristopher Kyle;Scott A. Crossley

  • A Linguistic Analysis of Simplified and Authentic Texts

    Scotta A. Crossley;Maxm M. Louwerse;Phillip M. McCarthy;Danielle McNamara

  • Assessing Text Readability Using Cognitively Based Indices

    Scott A. Crossley;Jerry Greenfield;Danielle S. McNAMARA

  • Predicting Second Language Writing Proficiency: The Roles of Cohesion and Linguistic Sophistication

    Scott A. Crossley;Danielle S. McNamara

  • Measuring Syntactic Complexity in L2 Writing Using Fine-Grained Clausal and Phrasal Indices.

    Kristopher Kyle;Scott A. Crossley

  • The tool for the automatic analysis of lexical sophistication (TAALES): version 2.0

    Kristopher Kyle;Scott Crossley;Cynthia Berger

  • The tool for the automatic analysis of text cohesion (TAACO): Automatic assessment of local, global, and text cohesion

    Scott A. Crossley;Kristopher Kyle;Danielle S. McNamara

  • Does writing development equal writing quality? A computational investigation of syntactic complexity in L2 learners

    Scott A. Crossley;Danielle S. McNamara

  • Predicting human judgments of essay quality in both integrated and independent second language writing samples: A comparison study

    Liang Guo;Scott A. Crossley;Danielle S. McNamara

  • Computational assessment of lexical differences in L1 and L2 writing

    Scott A. Crossley;Danielle S. McNamara

  • Text readability and intuitive simplification: A comparison of readability formulas

    Scott A. Crossley;David B. Allen;Danielle S. McNamara

  • Predicting lexical proficiency in language learner texts using computational indices

    Scott A. Crossley;Tom Salsbury;Danielle S. McNamara;Scott Jarvis

  • The development and use of cohesive devices in L2 writing and their relations to judgments of essay quality

    Scott A. Crossley;Kristopher Kyle;Danielle S. McNamara

  • The Development of Writing Proficiency as a Function of Grade Level: A Linguistic Analysis:

    Scott A. Crossley;Jennifer L. Weston;Susan T. McLain Sullivan;Danielle S. McNamara

  • Sentiment Analysis and Social Cognition Engine (SEANCE): An automatic tool for sentiment, social cognition, and social-order analysis

    Scott A. Crossley;Kristopher Kyle;Danielle S. McNamara

  • A Hierarchical Classification Approach to Automated Essay Scoring.

    Danielle S. McNamara;Scott A. Crossley;Rod D. Roscoe;Laura K. Allen

  • Linguistic features in writing quality and development: An overview

    Scott Crossley

  • Natural language processing in an intelligent writing strategy tutoring system

    Danielle S. McNamara;Scott A. Crossley;Rod Roscoe

  • The relationship between lexical sophistication and independent and source-based writing

    Kristopher Kyle;Scott Crossley

  • The Development of Polysemy and Frequency Use in English Second Language Speakers

    Scott Crossley;Tom Salsbury;Danielle McNamara

Frequent Co-Authors

Danielle S. McNamara
Danielle S. McNamara Arizona State University
Andrew J. Karter
Andrew J. Karter Kaiser Permanente
Dean Schillinger
Dean Schillinger University of California, San Francisco
Ryan S. Baker
Ryan S. Baker University of Pennsylvania
YouJin Kim
YouJin Kim Georgia State University
Tiffany Barnes
Tiffany Barnes North Carolina State University
Zhiqiang Cai
Zhiqiang Cai Purdue University West Lafayette
Kevyn Collins-Thompson
Kevyn Collins-Thompson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Arthur C. Graesser
Arthur C. Graesser University of Memphis
Sidney K. D'Mello
Sidney K. D'Mello University of Colorado Boulder

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in social sciences and humanities opens a world of flexible academic and career opportunities. Programs now offer various study formats—like part-time options—catering to busy professionals. For instance, part time psyd programs let students balance work, life, and doctoral-level psychology studies.

Counseling and therapy remain in high demand, and you can now complete mft programs (Marriage and Family Therapy) entirely online in less time than ever before. If you're looking for flexibility and cost savings, numerous online psychology masters programs provide budget-friendly pathways to careers in counseling, human resources, and more.

For education professionals aiming to advance their credentials at record pace, 1 year edd programs online offer the fastest route to leadership roles in educational settings. With these varied options, pursuing your passion in the social sciences and humanities has never been more accessible or career-focused.

Best Scientists Citing Scott A. Crossley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles