World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 75 1772 1593 87 83 239 25117

Lisa J. Phillips publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lisa J. Phillips between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lisa J. Phillips published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 9.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2004. 22 of the 277 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2004. 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 4 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 16 publications 2004: 23 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 20 publications 2007: 21 publications 2008: 19 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 12 publications
1996 2025

277 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lisa J. Phillips: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 2
1997 1
1998 4
1999 3
2000 5
2001 5
2002 7
2003 16
2004 23
2005 16
2006 20
2007 21
2008 19
2009 14
2010 7
2011 6
2012 7
2013 7
2014 7
2015 7
2016 6
2017 3
2018 6
2019 7
2020 8
2021 10
2022 8
2023 10
2024 10
2025 12
Total 277
Download as CSV

Lisa J. Phillips publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa J. Phillips sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 231–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 239 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226 239
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Lisa J. Phillips D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa J. Phillips sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74–75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169 75
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Lisa J. Phillips is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Medicine, with a strong focus on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Clinical Psychology. The scientist has contributed significantly to areas including Cognitive Neuroscience and Communication.

Their work extensively addresses topics such as Schizophrenia research and treatment, Mental Health Research Topics, and intersections of Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, and Cognitive Processes. Other notable subjects in their research include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments, Mental Health and Psychiatry, and studies related to Perfectionism, Procrastination, and Anxiety.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Lisa J. Phillips include:

  • Stephen J. Wood
  • Kelly Allott
  • Patrick D. McGorry
  • Alison R. Yung
  • Mario Álvarez-Jiménez

Lisa J. Phillips has published multiple papers in several recurrent academic venues. The most frequent publication outlets include:

  • Schizophrenia Research
  • Early Intervention in Psychiatry
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Behavioral Sleep Medicine

Representative recent publications from their scholarly work include:

  • "Cognitive strengths-based assessment and intervention in first-episode psychosis: A complementary approach to addressing functional recovery?", 2020, Clinical Psychology Review
  • "The role of fear of positive evaluation in social anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis.", 2022, Clinical Psychology Science and Practice
  • "Interrelationships between depressive symptoms and positive and negative symptoms of recent onset schizophrenia spectrum disorders: A network analytical approach", 2021, Journal of Psychiatric Research
  • "Barriers to young people seeking help for trauma: A qualitative analysis of Internet forums.", 2022, Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy
  • "Podcasts, Mental Health, and Stigma: Exploring Motivations, Behaviors, and Attitudes Among Listeners", 2023, Communication Studies

Best Publications

  • Mapping the onset of psychosis: the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States

    Alison R. Yung;Hok Pan Yuen;Patrick D. Mcgorry;Lisa J. Phillips

  • Neuroanatomical abnormalities before and after onset of psychosis: a cross-sectional and longitudinal MRI comparison.

    Christos Pantelis;Christos Pantelis;Dennis Velakoulis;Dennis Velakoulis;Patrick D McGorry;Stephen J Wood;Stephen J Wood

  • Psychosis prediction: 12-month follow up of a high-risk ("prodromal") group.

    Alison R Yung;Lisa J Phillips;Hok Pan Yuen;Shona M Francey

  • Randomized controlled trial of interventions designed to reduce the risk of progression to first-episode psychosis in a clinical sample with subthreshold symptoms.

    Patrick D. McGorry;Alison R. Yung;Lisa J. Phillips;Hok Pan Yuen

  • Prediction of psychosis. A step towards indicated prevention of schizophrenia

    Alison R. Yung;Lisa J. Phillips;Patrick D. McGorry;Colleen A. McFarlane

  • Risk factors for psychosis in an ultra high-risk group: psychopathology and clinical features.

    Alison R Yung;Lisa J Phillips;Hok Pan Yuen;Patrick D McGorry

  • Hippocampal and amygdala volumes according to psychosis stage and diagnosis: a magnetic resonance imaging study of chronic schizophrenia, first-episode psychosis, and ultra-high-risk individuals.

    Dennis Velakoulis;Stephen J Wood;Michael T H Wong;Patrick D McGorry

  • Structural Brain Imaging Evidence for Multiple Pathological Processes at Different Stages of Brain Development in Schizophrenia

    Christos Pantelis;Murat Yücel;Stephen J Wood;Dennis Velakoulis

  • Evidence-Based Treatments for Children and Adolescents: An Updated Review of Indicators of Efficacy and Effectiveness

    Bruce F. Chorpita;Eric L. Daleiden;Chad Ebesutani;John Young

  • Declining Transition Rate in Ultra High Risk (Prodromal) Services: Dilution or Reduction of Risk?

    Alison R Yung;Hok Pan Yuen;Gregor Berger;Shona Francey

  • VALIDATION OF "PRODROMAL" CRITERIA TO DETECT INDIVIDUALS AT ULTRA HIGH RISK OF PSYCHOSIS: 2 YEAR FOLLOW UP

    Alison Yung;B Nelson;C Stanford;M Simmons

  • Memory impairments identified in people at ultra-high risk for psychosis who later develop first-episode psychosis.

    Warrick J. Brewer;Shona M. Francey;Stephen J. Wood;Henry J. Jackson

  • Progressive Gray Matter Reduction of the Superior Temporal Gyrus During Transition to Psychosis

    Tsutomu Takahashi;Stephen J. Wood;Alison R. Yung;Bridget Soulsby

  • The “Close-in” or Ultra High-Risk Model: A Safe and Effective Strategy for Research and Clinical Intervention in Prepsychotic Mental Disorder

    Patrick D McGorry;Alison R Yung;Lisa J Phillips

  • Evidence of a dimensional relationship between schizotypy and schizophrenia: A systematic review

    M.T. Nelson;M.L. Seal;M.L. Seal;C. Pantelis;L.J. Phillips

  • Testing the Ultra High Risk (prodromal) criteria for the prediction of psychosis in a clinical sample of young people.

    Alison R. Yung;Carrie Stanford;Elizabeth Cosgrave;Eoin Killackey

  • Progressive brain structural changes mapped as psychosis develops in ?at risk? individuals

    Daqiang Sun;Lisa Phillips;Dennis Velakoulis;Alison Yung

  • The influence of motivation and adaptation on students’ subjective well-being, meaning in life and academic performance

    Thomas Hamilton Bailey;Lisa J. Phillips

  • Generalized and Specific Cognitive Performance in Clinical High-Risk Cohorts: A Review Highlighting Potential Vulnerability Markers for Psychosis

    Warrick J Brewer;Stephen J Wood;Lisa J Phillips;Shona M Francey

  • Identification of young people at risk of psychosis: validation of Personal Assessment and Crisis Evaluation Clinic intake criteria

    Lisa J Phillips;Allison R Yung;Patrick D McGorry

  • Mapping the onset of psychosis: the Comprehensive Assessment of At‐Risk Mental States

    Unknown

  • PROGRESSIVE GRAY MATTER REDUCTION OF THE SUPERIOR TEMPORAL GYRUS DURING TRANSITION TO PSYCHOSIS

    Christos Pantelis;T Takahashi;SJ Wood;Ar Yung

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick D. McGorry
Patrick D. McGorry University of Melbourne
Alison R. Yung
Alison R. Yung Deakin University
Christos Pantelis
Christos Pantelis University of Melbourne
Stephen J. Wood
Stephen J. Wood University of Melbourne
Dennis Velakoulis
Dennis Velakoulis University of Melbourne
Barnaby Nelson
Barnaby Nelson University of Melbourne
Henry J. Jackson
Henry J. Jackson University of Melbourne
Murat Yücel
Murat Yücel QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Kelly Allott
Kelly Allott University of Melbourne
Mark Walterfang
Mark Walterfang University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees in the USA opens up a variety of flexible and affordable pathways for students. Many programs offer specializations in areas such as counseling, child psychology, or organizational behavior, giving students the chance to tailor their education to specific interests.

Cost is a major consideration for many students. To find the cheapest psychology degrees in Kentucky, it's important to review tuition rates, available scholarships, and financial aid options. If you're considering programs on the West Coast, there are excellent opportunities among the affordable psychology degrees in Los Angeles.

Local options can make all the difference in reducing overall costs and commuting times. For instance, students seeking the most affordable psychology degree programs in Louisville have several options that balance quality with affordability. Similarly, those in the Midwest can explore affordable psychology degrees in Minneapolis.

Graduates with a psychology degree can pursue roles in mental health services, research, education, or human resources. Choosing an affordable and reputable program can help students launch a successful and meaningful psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Lisa J. Phillips

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles