World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
75
Citations
25117
World Ranking
1772
National Ranking
87

Lisa J. Phillips publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa J. Phillips sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 239 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Lisa J. Phillips D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa J. Phillips sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lisa J. Phillips is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Medicine, with a strong focus on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Clinical Psychology. The scientist has contributed significantly to areas including Cognitive Neuroscience and Communication.

Their work extensively addresses topics such as Schizophrenia research and treatment, Mental Health Research Topics, and intersections of Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, and Cognitive Processes. Other notable subjects in their research include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments, Mental Health and Psychiatry, and studies related to Perfectionism, Procrastination, and Anxiety.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Lisa J. Phillips include:

  • Stephen J. Wood
  • Kelly Allott
  • Patrick D. McGorry
  • Alison R. Yung
  • Mario Álvarez-Jiménez

Lisa J. Phillips has published multiple papers in several recurrent academic venues. The most frequent publication outlets include:

  • Schizophrenia Research
  • Early Intervention in Psychiatry
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Behavioral Sleep Medicine

Representative recent publications from their scholarly work include:

  • "Cognitive strengths-based assessment and intervention in first-episode psychosis: A complementary approach to addressing functional recovery?", 2020, Clinical Psychology Review
  • "The role of fear of positive evaluation in social anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis.", 2022, Clinical Psychology Science and Practice
  • "Interrelationships between depressive symptoms and positive and negative symptoms of recent onset schizophrenia spectrum disorders: A network analytical approach", 2021, Journal of Psychiatric Research
  • "Barriers to young people seeking help for trauma: A qualitative analysis of Internet forums.", 2022, Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy
  • "Podcasts, Mental Health, and Stigma: Exploring Motivations, Behaviors, and Attitudes Among Listeners", 2023, Communication Studies

Best Publications

  • Mapping the onset of psychosis: the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States

    Alison R. Yung;Hok Pan Yuen;Patrick D. Mcgorry;Lisa J. Phillips

  • Neuroanatomical abnormalities before and after onset of psychosis: a cross-sectional and longitudinal MRI comparison.

    Christos Pantelis;Christos Pantelis;Dennis Velakoulis;Dennis Velakoulis;Patrick D McGorry;Stephen J Wood;Stephen J Wood

  • Psychosis prediction: 12-month follow up of a high-risk ("prodromal") group.

    Alison R Yung;Lisa J Phillips;Hok Pan Yuen;Shona M Francey

  • Randomized controlled trial of interventions designed to reduce the risk of progression to first-episode psychosis in a clinical sample with subthreshold symptoms.

    Patrick D. McGorry;Alison R. Yung;Lisa J. Phillips;Hok Pan Yuen

  • Prediction of psychosis. A step towards indicated prevention of schizophrenia

    Alison R. Yung;Lisa J. Phillips;Patrick D. McGorry;Colleen A. McFarlane

  • Risk factors for psychosis in an ultra high-risk group: psychopathology and clinical features.

    Alison R Yung;Lisa J Phillips;Hok Pan Yuen;Patrick D McGorry

  • Hippocampal and amygdala volumes according to psychosis stage and diagnosis: a magnetic resonance imaging study of chronic schizophrenia, first-episode psychosis, and ultra-high-risk individuals.

    Dennis Velakoulis;Stephen J Wood;Michael T H Wong;Patrick D McGorry

  • Structural Brain Imaging Evidence for Multiple Pathological Processes at Different Stages of Brain Development in Schizophrenia

    Christos Pantelis;Murat Yücel;Stephen J Wood;Dennis Velakoulis

  • Evidence-Based Treatments for Children and Adolescents: An Updated Review of Indicators of Efficacy and Effectiveness

    Bruce F. Chorpita;Eric L. Daleiden;Chad Ebesutani;John Young

  • Declining Transition Rate in Ultra High Risk (Prodromal) Services: Dilution or Reduction of Risk?

    Alison R Yung;Hok Pan Yuen;Gregor Berger;Shona Francey

  • VALIDATION OF "PRODROMAL" CRITERIA TO DETECT INDIVIDUALS AT ULTRA HIGH RISK OF PSYCHOSIS: 2 YEAR FOLLOW UP

    Alison Yung;B Nelson;C Stanford;M Simmons

  • Memory impairments identified in people at ultra-high risk for psychosis who later develop first-episode psychosis.

    Warrick J. Brewer;Shona M. Francey;Stephen J. Wood;Henry J. Jackson

  • Progressive Gray Matter Reduction of the Superior Temporal Gyrus During Transition to Psychosis

    Tsutomu Takahashi;Stephen J. Wood;Alison R. Yung;Bridget Soulsby

  • The “Close-in” or Ultra High-Risk Model: A Safe and Effective Strategy for Research and Clinical Intervention in Prepsychotic Mental Disorder

    Patrick D McGorry;Alison R Yung;Lisa J Phillips

  • Evidence of a dimensional relationship between schizotypy and schizophrenia: A systematic review

    M.T. Nelson;M.L. Seal;M.L. Seal;C. Pantelis;L.J. Phillips

  • Testing the Ultra High Risk (prodromal) criteria for the prediction of psychosis in a clinical sample of young people.

    Alison R. Yung;Carrie Stanford;Elizabeth Cosgrave;Eoin Killackey

  • Progressive brain structural changes mapped as psychosis develops in ?at risk? individuals

    Daqiang Sun;Lisa Phillips;Dennis Velakoulis;Alison Yung

  • The influence of motivation and adaptation on students’ subjective well-being, meaning in life and academic performance

    Thomas Hamilton Bailey;Lisa J. Phillips

  • Generalized and Specific Cognitive Performance in Clinical High-Risk Cohorts: A Review Highlighting Potential Vulnerability Markers for Psychosis

    Warrick J Brewer;Stephen J Wood;Lisa J Phillips;Shona M Francey

  • Identification of young people at risk of psychosis: validation of Personal Assessment and Crisis Evaluation Clinic intake criteria

    Lisa J Phillips;Allison R Yung;Patrick D McGorry

  • Mapping the onset of psychosis: the Comprehensive Assessment of At‐Risk Mental States

    Unknown

  • PROGRESSIVE GRAY MATTER REDUCTION OF THE SUPERIOR TEMPORAL GYRUS DURING TRANSITION TO PSYCHOSIS

    Christos Pantelis;T Takahashi;SJ Wood;Ar Yung

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick D. McGorry
Patrick D. McGorry University of Melbourne
Alison R. Yung
Alison R. Yung Deakin University
Christos Pantelis
Christos Pantelis University of Melbourne
Stephen J. Wood
Stephen J. Wood University of Melbourne
Dennis Velakoulis
Dennis Velakoulis University of Melbourne
Barnaby Nelson
Barnaby Nelson University of Melbourne
Henry J. Jackson
Henry J. Jackson University of Melbourne
Murat Yücel
Murat Yücel QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Kelly Allott
Kelly Allott University of Melbourne
Mark Walterfang
Mark Walterfang University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees in the USA opens up a variety of flexible and affordable pathways for students. Many programs offer specializations in areas such as counseling, child psychology, or organizational behavior, giving students the chance to tailor their education to specific interests.

Cost is a major consideration for many students. To find the cheapest psychology degrees in Kentucky, it's important to review tuition rates, available scholarships, and financial aid options. If you're considering programs on the West Coast, there are excellent opportunities among the affordable psychology degrees in Los Angeles.

Local options can make all the difference in reducing overall costs and commuting times. For instance, students seeking the most affordable psychology degree programs in Louisville have several options that balance quality with affordability. Similarly, those in the Midwest can explore affordable psychology degrees in Minneapolis.

Graduates with a psychology degree can pursue roles in mental health services, research, education, or human resources. Choosing an affordable and reputable program can help students launch a successful and meaningful psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Lisa J. Phillips

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles