World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 117 288 249 181 154 598 60182
Computer Science 105 284 275 155 150 580 48764

Arthur C. Graesser publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Arthur C. Graesser between 1973 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Arthur C. Graesser published across 53 years, from 1973 to 2025, averaging 13.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 63 publications in 2014. 14 of the 714 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 63. Peak 63 publications in 2014. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 4 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 5 publications 1981: 11 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 7 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 11 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 13 publications 1994: 13 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 13 publications 1999: 20 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 18 publications 2002: 16 publications 2003: 15 publications 2004: 19 publications 2005: 20 publications 2006: 20 publications 2007: 29 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 32 publications 2010: 21 publications 2011: 30 publications 2012: 37 publications 2013: 29 publications 2014: 63 publications 2015: 24 publications 2016: 22 publications 2017: 32 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 11 publications
1973 2025

714 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Arthur C. Graesser: publications per year, 1973 to 2025
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 1
1975 1
1976 1
1977 0
1978 4
1979 1
1980 5
1981 11
1982 3
1983 2
1984 1
1985 7
1986 3
1987 3
1988 3
1989 7
1990 11
1991 7
1992 5
1993 13
1994 13
1995 8
1996 6
1997 7
1998 13
1999 20
2000 14
2001 18
2002 16
2003 15
2004 19
2005 20
2006 20
2007 29
2008 20
2009 32
2010 21
2011 30
2012 37
2013 29
2014 63
2015 24
2016 22
2017 32
2018 25
2019 18
2020 14
2021 9
2022 6
2023 10
2024 3
2025 11
Total 714
Download as CSV

Arthur C. Graesser publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arthur C. Graesser sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 572–581 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 580 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43 580
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Arthur C. Graesser D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arthur C. Graesser sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 104–105 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 105 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37 105
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2008 - Fellow of the American Educational Research Association
  • 1993 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Arthur C. Graesser is affiliated with the University of Memphis in the United States. Their research spans several fields, primarily computer science and psychology, with a notable focus on artificial intelligence and developmental and educational psychology. Their contributions address various topics including intelligent tutoring systems and adaptive learning, online learning and analytics, innovative teaching and learning methods, text readability and simplification, teaching and learning programming, topic modeling, and reading and literacy development.

Graesser has published extensively, with key recent papers including the following:

  • "Computational Thinking Is More about Thinking than Computing," 2020, Journal for STEM Education Research
  • "On Computational Thinking and STEM Education," 2020, Journal for STEM Education Research
  • "Educational Psychology Is Evolving to Accommodate Technology, Multiple Disciplines, and Twenty-First-Century Skills," 2021, Annual Review of Psychology
  • "Role of questions in inquiry-based instruction: towards a design taxonomy for question-asking and implications for design," 2020, Educational Technology Research and Development
  • "Introduction to the special issue: the role of metacognition in complex skills - spotlights on problem solving, collaboration, and self-regulated learning," 2022, Metacognition and Learning

Their frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal for STEM Education Research
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Discourse Processes
  • Annual Review of Psychology

Graesser collaborates regularly with several coauthors, the most frequent being:

  • Xiangen Hu
  • John Sabatini
  • Liang Zhang
  • Daphne Greenberg
  • Jionghao Lin

Their work makes significant contributions to understanding and enhancing learning processes, especially through the lens of intelligent tutoring systems and educational technology. The integration of psychological principles within computer science applications is a notable aspect of their research approach.

Recognition of Graesser's professional contributions includes being named a Fellow of the American Educational Research Association in 2008 and a Fellow of the American Psychological Association in 1993.

Best Publications

  • Is it an Agent, or Just a Program?: A Taxonomy for Autonomous Agents

    Stan Franklin;Art Graesser

  • Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension.

    Arthur C. Graesser;Murray Singer;Tom Trabasso

  • Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language

    Arthur C. Graesser;Danielle S. McNamara;Max M. Louwerse;Zhiqiang Cai

  • Question Asking During Tutoring

    Arthur C. Graesser;Natalie K. Person

  • The Construction of Situation Models in Narrative Comprehension: An Event-Indexing Model

    Rolf A. Zwaan;Mark C. Langston;Arthur C. Graesser

  • Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice

    Douglas J. Hacker;John Dunlosky;Arthur C. Graesser

  • Prose Comprehension Beyond the Word

    Arthur C. Graesser

  • Automated Evaluation of Text and Discourse with Coh-Metrix

    Danielle S. McNamara;Arthur C. Graesser;Philip M. McCarthy;Zhiqiang Cai

  • Better to be frustrated than bored: The incidence, persistence, and impact of learners' cognitive-affective states during interactions with three different computer-based learning environments

    Ryan S. J. d. Baker;Sidney K. D'Mello;Ma.Mercedes T. Rodrigo;Arthur C. Graesser

  • Dynamics of affective states during complex learning

    Sidney D’Mello;Art Graesser

  • Handbook of Metacognition in Education

    Douglas J. Hacker;John Dunlosky;Arthur C. Graesser

  • Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension.

    Rolf A. Zwaan;Joseph P. Magliano;Arthur C. Graesser

  • Confusion can be beneficial for learning

    Sidney D’Mello;Blair Lehman;Reinhard Pekrun;Art Graesser

  • AutoTutor: an intelligent tutoring system with mixed-initiative dialogue

    A.C. Graesser;P. Chipman;B.C. Haynes;A. Olney

  • Affect and Learning: An Exploratory Look into the Role of Affect in Learning with AutoTutor

    Scotty D. Craig;Arthur C. Graesser;Jeremiah Sullins;Barry Gholson

  • Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one-to-one tutoring

    Arthur C. Graesser;Natalie K. Person;Joseph P. Magliano

  • Coh-Metrix: Providing Multilevel Analyses of Text Characteristics

    Arthur C. Graesser;Danielle S. McNamara;Jonna M. Kulikowich

  • AutoTutor: a tutor with dialogue in natural language.

    Arthur C. Graesser;Shulan Lu;George Tanner Jackson;Heather Hite Mitchell

  • Structures and Procedures of Implicit Knowledge

    Arthur C. Graesser;Leslie F. Clark

  • Organizing Instruction and Study to Improve Student Learning. IES Practice Guide. NCER 2007-2004.

    Harold Pashler;Patrice M. Bain;Brian A. Bottge;Arthur Graesser

Frequent Co-Authors

Zhiqiang Cai
Zhiqiang Cai Purdue University West Lafayette
Sidney K. D'Mello
Sidney K. D'Mello University of Colorado Boulder
Danielle S. McNamara
Danielle S. McNamara Arizona State University
Susan R. Goldman
Susan R. Goldman University of Illinois at Chicago
David Williamson Shaffer
David Williamson Shaffer University of Wisconsin–Madison
Diane F. Halpern
Diane F. Halpern Claremont McKenna College
Joseph P. Magliano
Joseph P. Magliano Georgia State University
Kurt VanLehn
Kurt VanLehn Arizona State University
James W. Pennebaker
James W. Pennebaker The University of Texas at Austin
Caitlin Mills
Caitlin Mills University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you consider studying Psychology in the USA, it's essential to understand the wide range of online degrees and career pathways available. Many students pursue advanced specializations, such as becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), which opens doors to careers in clinical, educational, and community settings.

Each region may have specific guidelines for training and certification. For example, if you are interested in practicing in Southern California, be sure to review the San Diego bcba education requirements and bcba certification requirements in Santa Ana. Those interested in working in the Bay Area should explore the steps to becoming a bcba in San Francisco as well as how to become a bcba in San Jose.

Accredited online psychology programs often offer flexible study options and can help you meet regional licensing and certification demands. As you plan your educational journey, consider the requirements that align with your career goals and location to ensure the path you choose leads to professional success.

Best Scientists Citing Arthur C. Graesser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles