World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ivar Bråten

Ivar Bråten

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
64
Citations
13351
World Ranking
3014
National Ranking
20

Ivar Bråten publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ivar Bråten sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 191 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Ivar Bråten D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ivar Bråten sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ivar Bråten is affiliated with the University of Oslo in Norway. Their research spans the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences, with a particular focus on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Information Systems.

The main areas of study for Bråten include Educational Strategies and Epistemologies, Reading and Literacy Development, Education and Critical Thinking Development, Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods, Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes, Online and Blended Learning, and Advanced Text Analysis Techniques.

Bråten has contributed extensively to academic literature, with publications primarily appearing in the following venues:

  • Reading and Writing
  • Contemporary Educational Psychology
  • Computers & Education
  • Instructional Science
  • Reading Research Quarterly

Among recent papers, the following are notable:

  • "Does reading medium affect processing and integration of textual and pictorial information? A multimedia eye-tracking study" (2020), Contemporary Educational Psychology
  • "The Role of Individual Differences in Sourcing: a Systematic Review" (2021), Educational Psychology Review
  • "The Role of Internet-Specific Justification Beliefs in Source Evaluation and Corroboration During Web Search on an Unsettled Socio-Scientific Issue" (2020), Journal of Educational Computing Research
  • "Effects of reading medium on the processing, comprehension, and calibration of adolescent readers" (2022), Computers & Education
  • "Predictors and outcomes of behavioral engagement in the context of text comprehension: when quantity means quality" (2021), Reading and Writing

Bråten frequently collaborates with several researchers. The most common co-authors include:

  • Ymkje E. Haverkamp
  • Helge I. Strømsø
  • Natalia Latini
  • Ladislao Salmerón
  • Øistein Anmarkrud

Best Publications

  • The Role of Epistemic Beliefs in the Comprehension of Multiple Expository Texts: Toward an Integrated Model

    Ivar Bråten;M. Anne Britt;Helge I. Strømsø;Jean-François Rouet

  • Handbook of Epistemic Cognition

    Jeffrey A. Greene;William A. Sandoval;Ivar Bråten

  • Trust Matters: Examining the Role of Source Evaluation in Students' Construction of Meaning Within and Across Multiple Texts

    Ivar Bråten;Helge I. Strømsø;M. Anne Britt

  • The relationship between epistemological beliefs, implicit theories of intelligence, and self-regulated learning among Norwegian postsecondary students.

    Ivar Bråten;Helge I. Strømsø

  • Epistemological Beliefs and Implicit Theories of Intelligence as Predictors of Achievement Goals.

    Ivar Bråten;Helge I. Strømsø

  • The cognitive and linguistic foundations of early reading development: a Norwegian latent variable longitudinal study.

    Arne Lervag;Ivar Braten;Charles Hulme

  • Trust and mistrust when students read multiple information sources about climate change

    Ivar Bråten;Helge I. Strømsø;Ladislao Salmerón

  • Multiple-documents literacy: Strategic processing, source awareness, and argumentation when reading multiple conflicting documents

    Øistein Anmarkrud;Ivar Bråten;Helge I. Strømsø

  • Motivation for Reading Comprehension.

    Øistein Anmarkrud;Ivar Bråten

  • Epistemological beliefs, interest, and gender as predictors of Internet-based learning activities

    Ivar Bråten;Helge I. Strømsø

  • Reading multiple texts about climate change: The relationship between memory for sources and text comprehension

    Helge I. Strømsø;Ivar Bråten;M. Anne Britt

  • Are sophisticated students always better? The role of topic-specific personal epistemology in the understanding of multiple expository texts

    Ivar Bråten;Helge I. Strømsø;Marit S. Samuelstuen

  • Effects of Task Instruction and Personal Epistemology on the Understanding of Multiple Texts About Climate Change

    Ivar Bråten;Helge I. Strømsø

  • Developing and testing a model of direct and indirect relationships between individual differences, processing, and multiple-text comprehension

    Ivar Bråten;Øistein Anmarkrud;Christian Brandmo;Helge I. Strømsø

  • Summary versus Argument Tasks when Working with Multiple Documents: Which Is Better for Whom?.

    Laura Gil;Ivar Bråten;Eduardo Vidal-Abarca;Helge I. Strømsø

  • Epistemic Cognition when Students Read Multiple Documents Containing Conflicting Scientific Evidence: A Think-Aloud Study.

    Leila E. Ferguson;Ivar Bråten;Helge I. Strømsø

  • Profiling Individual Differences in Student Motivation: A Longitudinal Cluster-Analytic Study in Different Academic Contexts.

    Ivar Bråten;Bodil S. Olaussen

  • Implementation and effects of explicit reading comprehension instruction in fifth-grade classrooms

    Rune Andreassen;Ivar Bråten

  • Examining the prediction of reading comprehension on different multiple‐choice tests

    Rune Andreassen;Ivar Bråten

  • The Discrepancy-Induced Source Comprehension (D-ISC) Model: Basic Assumptions and Preliminary Evidence

    Jason L. G. Braasch;Ivar Bråten

  • Decoding, knowledge, and strategies in comprehension of expository text.

    Marit S. Samuelstuen;Ivar Bråten

Frequent Co-Authors

Helge I. Strømsø
Helge I. Strømsø University of Oslo
M. Anne Britt
M. Anne Britt Northern Illinois University
Jeffrey A. Greene
Jeffrey A. Greene University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Panayiota Kendeou
Panayiota Kendeou University of Minnesota
Arne Lervåg
Arne Lervåg University of Oslo
Charles Hulme
Charles Hulme University of Oxford
Joseph P. Magliano
Joseph P. Magliano Georgia State University
Peter Gerjets
Peter Gerjets University of Tübingen
Krista R. Muis
Krista R. Muis McGill University
Paavo H.T. Leppänen
Paavo H.T. Leppänen University of Jyväskylä

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens doors to many rewarding online degrees and career pathways in social work and mental health services. Whether you plan to work directly with individuals, families, or communities, understanding the educational requirements in different states is crucial.

For instance, aspiring professionals should be aware of social worker degree requirements in Tennessee, which outline specific credentials and coursework needed to practice. Similarly, if you’re planning a career in Texas, it’s essential to meet the Texas minimum degree requirement for social workers before applying for positions.

Other states, like Utah and Vermont, have their own standards and evaluation processes. Learn more about Utah education requirements for social workers to better understand what an online psychology or social work degree could mean for your future. If you’re interested in practicing in the New England region, review the degree needed to be a social worker in Vermont.

No matter where you choose to launch your career, researching state-specific education and certification pathways will help you make informed decisions and plan your studies for long-term success.

Best Scientists Citing Ivar Bråten

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles